Comparable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comparable Sorted by: recent Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.024 seconds)Pulusu Perireddy Vs. Govt. of A.P., Panchayat Raj Dept. Hyd. and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)ALD453
..... that it was received by him on 27 10 1998 at 11 a m i compared the same with the prescribed form and i find that it is exactly in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpecial Deputy Collector, (L.A.O), Anakapalli Vs. Padala Venkata Raman ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1998
Reported in: 1999(2)ALD115; 1999(2)ALT54
..... ex a6 dated 7 5 1979 was sought to be projected as another instance of comparable sale the sale consideration under ex a6 is rs 10 000 it works out to ..... sites though exaggerated in some respects cannot be ignored it is no doubt that no comparable sale transaction worthy of credence has been filed by the claimants but the fact remains .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDujodwala Paper Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-29-1998
Reported in: (1999)(110)ELT901Tri(Mum.)bai
..... to 3260 us the department it is contended had wrongly sought to compare the instant import with that of import made by m s raptiko ..... in the b e as edible acid casein the department sought to compare this with the import made by m s raptiko brett amp co ..... given above would go to show that the goods which have been compared are not at all neither identical nor similar in quantity and country .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Gold Star Engineering Enterprises
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-29-1998
Reported in: [2000]119STC343(AP)
..... is a primary school and it is not a school recognised by any such board comparable to the divisional board or the state board the school tribunal constituted under section 8 ..... is a primary school and it is not a school recognised by any such board comparable to the divisional board or the state board that being the position it is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohn Sunny Varghese Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-i
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-29-1998
..... no 3515 1998 is dismissed complaint dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d comparative citations 2000 1 cpc 212 1999 3 cpr 373 1999 2 cpj 443
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNataraj Bore-well Services Vs. Water Development Society and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-29-1998
..... 1996 10 scc 590 followed para 3 4 1996 11 scc 23 followed para 4 comparative citations 2000 1 clt 338 1999 3 cpr 423 2000 1 cpc 223 1999 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Parameswaran Vs. State
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)ALD727; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)307; 1999CriLJ2059
..... satisfied in this case 10 further there appears to be a substantial change in the comparable provisions under the prevention of corruption act 1988 namely section 13 1 d of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Haryana and anr. Vs. Jagir Kaur and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-24-1998
Reported in: (1999)122PLR259
..... the court must look at the very outset for a legal evidence which would give comparable instances18 as already noticed the lands acquired at villages patti mehar jandli and sounda ..... average basis valuation of the following exhibits proved in accordance with law and relevant and comparable instances afore stated would be proper exhibit date of notification amount of compensation remarksunder section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.R. Radhakrishnan and Vs. Appropriate Authority
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-24-1998
Reported in: [2001]249ITR690(Mad)
..... the sale consideration of this property as agreed between the parties compared with the sale realisation from sale of property at no ..... proceed to pre emptively purchase the property by seeking to compare a property with a 70 year old building with one ..... authority to proceed to pre emptively purchased property by seeking to compare such recently constructed building with 70 year old building building .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.P.S.E.B. Rep. by Its Superintending Engineer and Another Vs. K. Nara ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-24-1998
..... indian electricity act 1910 section 24 case referred 1995 2 scc 648 followed para 4 comparative citations 1999 2 cpc 476 1999 3 cpr 185 1999 2 cpj 293
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial