Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 4 entry of names in the register Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 1,560 results (0.070 seconds)

Ajit Kumar Doshi Vs. Institute of Company Secretaries of India and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT114(HC)

..... 's application for enrolment as an associate member was rejected.3. the company secretaries act, 1980 came into force on and from january, 1981. by the said act the institute of company secretaries of india which was incorporated under the companies act, 1956 stood dissolved. it is further claimed by the petitioner that none the less the company secretaries (qualification) rules, 1975 dated 7th march, 1975 and a notification dated 15th ..... also claimed by the petitioner that the petitioner's application was pending when the said company secretaries act, 1980 came into force in january, 1981. therefore, under section 32(4) of the said company secretaries act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the said act) which, inter alia, provides that if, on the commencement of this act, any suit, appeal or other legal proceedings of whatever nature by or against the .....

Abdul Hameed Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1047; RLW2003(4)Raj2618; 2002(5)WLC898

..... offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded againstand punished accordingly. explanation : ..... -at-will cannot effectuate the firm's dissolution as from an interior date. in m.o.h. uduman and ors. v. m.o.h. aslum, air 1980 1991 supreme court 1020, it was held that in view of the clear provision in partnership deed that partnership will continue till there are two partners, it is ..... 1. heard learned counsels for the parties and learned public prosecutor. 2. the complainant-respondent no. 2 filed a complaint under section 138, the negotiable instruments act, 1881 (in short the 'act 1881') against the accused petitioner in the court of learned judicial magistrate no. 1, jaipur city, jaipur on 21.4.1992 with the averments that the .....

Prince Kumar and Ors. Vs. The Institute of Company Secretaries of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

..... any of the reliefs sought in the petition for the following reasons: (i) the right to contest the election to the regional councils, being a statutory right created by the companies secretaries act, 1980 and the rules and regulations made thereunder, it is subject to qualifications and disqualifications prescribed therein. the law in this regard is well settled and has been reiterated in n ..... exceed rupees five thousand, and on application made and granted in the prescribed manner, be entered in the register as a fellow.7. as per section 9(1) of the company secretaries act, 1980, there shall be a council of the institute for the management of the affairs of the institute and for discharging the functions assigned to it by or under the .....

U S Vs. Guinet

Court : US Supreme Court

..... on the adjoining wharf. he, therefore, desired the carpenter to desist from working any further on the vessel, and made a report on the subject, to the secretary at war; who directed, that all the recent equipments of a warlike nature should be dismantled, and the vessel restored to the state in which she was when ..... ; that an apprentice to the pilot on board of her, was left behind in order to carry on some guns, cordage, and bedding; that accordingly, he, in company with his master, (who had returned from wilmington, after piloting the vessel thither) two or three frenchmen that belonged to the vessel, and two black boys, carried and ..... the french republic; and the position certainly received some countenance, from the refusal of a grand jury in boston to find bills of indictment against persons who had acted in that manner, and from the acquittal of gideon hempfield by a philadelphia jury. these interpretations and proceedings were, however, disapproved by our executive; who, on the .....

Sims' Lessee Vs. Irvine

Court : US Supreme Court

..... their heirs or assigns, claiming under the late governor dinwiddie's proclamation of a bounty in lands to the first virginia regiment, and having returned to the secretary's office, surveys made by virtue of a special commission from the president and masters of william and mary college, shall be entitled to grants thereupon on ..... the land office, and for other purposes,' the material parts of which law, are expressed in the following terms:" " whereas the time fixed by an act entitled 'an act for adjusting and settling the titles of claimers to unpatented lands under the present and former governments previous to the establishment of the commonwealth's land office, ..... construed or extend to give any person a title to land for service performed in any company or detachment of militia." the jury found in haec verba another law of virginia enacted also in may, 1779, entitled "an act for establishing a land office and ascertaining the terms and manner of granting waste and unappropriated lands .....

Com. of Pennsylvania Vs. Coxe

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and unless the indian war operated as a release of the condition, there is no title acquired. 3d. whether a mandamus does lie to the secretary of the land office, even if the holland company are entitled to patents. the board of property is a court of justice; and should be governed by the principles of law, in relation to ..... proceeding, in this case, by mandamus. 1st. of the facts relative to the hostile state of the country; and the persevering endeavours of the holland company, to accomplish the settlement prescribed by the act. page 4 u.s. 170, 181 whatever may be the effect of the proviso in suspending, or releasing, the obligation to settle and improve the ..... been prevented from making a settlement on a tract of land, containing _____ situate, &c.; _____ conformable to the proviso, contained in the 9th section of the act, entitled 'an act for the sale of vacant lands within this commonwealth,' passed the third day of april, 1792, by force of arms of the enemies of the united states; and .....

Attorney General Vs. Grantees

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and residence, required by the said act, at any time before the date of such warrants respectively, or within two years after? it well be proper here to observe, that on the motion for the mandamus to the late secretary of the land-office, at the instance of the holland company; the members of this court, ..... after great consideration of the subject, were divided in their opinions. the chief justice seemed to be of opinion, that if the warrantee was 'by force of arms of the enemies of the united states, prevented from making an actual settlement, as described in the act ..... on the motion for a mandamus, and as presented to the legislature, evidently involve the following considerations: 1st. whether the company have complied with the condition of the 9th section of the act of april 1792? 2d. whether the reasons assigned for a non-compliance with the condition, bring their case within the proviso .....

BALFOUR'S LESSEE Vs. MEADE

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ; that of course, he never had an inceptive title to be protected by the proviso in the 9th section of the act of the 3d of april 1792. they cited addison, 248. 335. the case of the holland company v. coxe, in the supreme court of this state (ante, p. 170.) and the decisions of the judges of that ..... those lying north and west of the ohio, alleghany, and conewango, by warrant without settlement. the 3d section, referring to all the above lands, authorises applications to the secretary of the land office, by any person having settled and improved, or who was desirous to settle and improve, a plantation to be particularly described; for a warrant for ..... , and to prevent any conclusions from being drawn from what has been said, either to countenance, or impeach, those decisions. the cases i allude to are, the holland company v. coxe, and the feigned issue tried at sunbury. the incipient title, under which the plaintiffs claimed in those causes, were warrants, authorised by the 3d section of .....

Head and Amory Vs. Providence Insurance Company

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the law is supposed to require. it demands the additional circumstance that a policy should be countersigned by the secretary. it appears to the court that an act not performed according to the requisites of the law cannot be considered as the act of the company in a case relating to the formation or dissolution of a policy. if the testimony of mr. jackson ..... . 166 it is also very questionable whether the unsigned note delivered by the secretary is such an acceptance as to form, when taken with the letter of the 3d of september, an absolute agreement obligatory on the company. it is a general rule that a corporation can only act in the manner prescribed by law. when its agents do not clothe their proceedings .....

Church Vs. Hubbart

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , other testimony, inferior in its nature, might be received. a certificate of the proceedings of a foreign court under the seal of a person who styles himself the secretary of foreign affairs of portugal is not evidence. if the decrees of the colonies are transmitted to the seat of government and registered in the department of state, a ..... janeiro, where she remained some days, and under a permit some of the cargo was sold, and afterwards sailed for para on the coast of brazil, and in company with another vessel came to anchor about four or five leagues from the land. the destination of the vessel after she left rio janeiro was by order of the plaintiff ..... . in this as in all other cases, no testimony will be required which is shown to be unattainable. but no civilized nation will be presumed to refuse those acts for authenticating instruments which are usual and which are deemed necessary for the purposes of justice. it cannot be presumed that an application to authenticate an edict by the .....