Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter vii penalties Court: supreme court of india Page 4 of about 833 results (0.341 seconds)

S.N. Mukherjee Vs. Union of Inida

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC1984; 1990CriLJ2148a; JT1990(3)SC630; (1990)4SCC594; [1990]Supp1SCR44; 1991(1)SLJ1(SC); (1990)3UPLBEC2093

..... if any, in any proceedings in writing and shall give reasons in writing therefor if requested by a party.' (section 17). the said act has now been replaced by the statutory powers and procedure act, 1980, which contains a similar provision.18. the position at common law is no different in australia. the court of appeal of the supreme ..... by a company to register the transfer of shares, has held that there was no proper trial of the appeals before the central government since no reasons had been given in support of the order passed by the deputy secretary who heard the appeals. in that case it has been observed:if the central government acts as a ..... order dated may 11, 1979. the appellant, thereafter, submitted a post-confirmation petition under section 164(2) of the act. the said petition of the appellant was rejected by the central government by order dated may 6, 1980. the appellant thereupon filed the writ petition in the high court of delhi. the said writ petition was dismised, in .....

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512

..... (river) & harbour master (*port). sd/-(d.k. rao)harbour master (port) copy to: dmd/tmn/fa&cao;/secretary/h.m.(r)'75. cochin port trust had also been contemplating to issue such circular.76. it may be true that ..... changing scenario inasmuch as the field of insurance has undergone a sea change from merely hull and machinery, the insurance companies cover various risks including oil spill damage to the port, damage to the cargo etc. in that sense the term ..... and not to undervalue its organic processes - its continuities and relationships' in jagdish saran and ors. v. union of india : [1980]2scr831 , it is stated: 'law, constitutional law, is not an omnipotent abstraction or distant idealization but a principled, yet pragmatic ..... to demonstrate proof of financial responsibility for oil spills occurring in alaskan waters. the effective date of the financial responsibility act is 1, september 2000.proof of financial responsibility must be established for non-tank vessels operating in alaskan waters in .....

Hemaji Waghaji Jat Vs. Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC103; 2008(6)ALD121(SC); 2008(4)AWC4152(SC); (SCSuppl)2009(1)CHN1; [2008(4)JCR71(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT357(SC); 2008(12)SCALE697; 2008AIRSCW6996; 2008(5)LH(SC)3585.

..... moved the local land registry against the applicant on the ground that he had obtained title by adverse possession. the grahams challenged the applicant company's claims under the limitation act, 1980 ('the 1980 act') which provides that a person cannot bring an action to recover any land after the expiration of 12 years of adverse possession by another. ..... of adverse possession.11. we deem it appropriate to deal with some important cases decided by this court regarding the principle of adverse possession.12. in secretary of state for india v. debendra lal khan it was observed that the ordinary classical requirement of adverse possession is that it should be nec vi, nec ..... high court reads as under:the learned first appellate judge has also discussed the relevant entries as well as order passed by deputy collector, collector and special secretary in those proceedings and on the basis of the same, the learned first appellate judge has reached to the finding that the plaintiff has failed to .....

Howrah Municipal Corpn. and ors. Vs. Ganges Rope Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN52; JT2003(10)SC355; 2003(10)SCALE106; (2004)1SCC663

..... , sought by the respondent - company, was delayed by the corporation without any justification, its prayer for grant of sanction for additional three floors cannot be granted as the howrah municipal corporation building rules 1991 framed under the provisions of howrah municipal corporation act 1980 (for short 'the act') have been amended and the ..... building rules, 1991 permissible height of building, floor area ratio & conditions including uses is confirmed.certified to be true copy of the origin.sd/- secretary, howrah municipal corporation'[underlining for pointed attention]11. on the basis of the amended rule 20 which came into force with effect from 15.7.1994 ..... plan, indemnity bond for deep foundation work, proposal plans approved by fire service authority and other documents showing permission for 'change of user'. the company along with the letter dated 10.8.1994 complied with the directions and submitted the required papers and documents.9. when the application for sanction for .....

Smt. K. Aruna Kumari Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC227; 1988CriLJ411; 1987(3)Crimes741(SC); 1988(43)ELT4(SC); JT1987(4)SC378; 1987(2)SCALE1121; (1988)1SCC296; [1988]1SCR973; 1988(1)LC103(SC)

..... sharma j.1. madhava rao, husband of the petitioner, has been detained under section 3 of the prevention of blackmarketing and maintenance of supplies of essential commodities act, 1980. the petitioner filed an application under article 226 of the constitution before the andhra pradesh high court for a writ of habeas corpus which was dismissed on 18 ..... relevant material to the detaining authority which was a vitiating factor. this court had occasion to deal with them in pushpadevi m. jatia v. m.l. wadhawan, additional secretary, government of india and ors. : 1987crilj1888 of its judgment. these decisions proceed on the well settled principle that if 'material and vital facts' which would influence the ..... to a letter by one k. eswara rao that 1000 bags of cement issued to him on 16.12.1986 was puzzolon portland cement, pyramid brand of pariyan company and it was urged that as the 5 empty bags having the marks of 'ajanta brand kesoram, basant nagar (a.p.) portland pozzolana cement' as stated in .....

Consolidated Coffee Ltd. and anr. Vs. Coffee Board, Bangalore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1468; (1980)3SCC358; [1980]3SCR625; [1980]46STC164(SC)

..... transaction and in this behalf strong reliance was placed by counsel for the petitioners on the following observations of justice shah in the case of ben gorm nilgiri plantations company, coonoor and ors. v. sales tax officer, special circle, ernakulam and ors. : [1964]7scr706 .a sale in the course of export predicates a connection ..... goods inasmuch as it is abundantly clear from the affidavit of shri meenaxi sunderam, the chief coffee marketing officer of the coffee board dated 20th february, 1980 that every lot put up for auction invariably contains 5 % of coffee more than the quantity indicated in the catalogues and the coffee sold from only ..... export auctions conducted by the coffee board constitute 'penultimate sales' falling within section 5(3) and qualify for the exemption from the tax liability under the act in as much as both the conditions mentioned above are satisfied.7. the petitioners' case is that notwithstanding the aforesaid position the coffee board by its circular .....

A.K. Roy ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC710; 1982CriLJ340; 1981(4)SCALE1904; (1982)1SCC271; [1982]2SCR272

..... makes it clear that non-implementation of the provisions of section 3 was not due to any practical or administrative difficulty. however, the national security act, 1980 which replaced the ordinance does not retain the provison of clause 9 of the ordinance and prescribes the constitution of the advisory boards in section 9 ..... a legal practitioner before the advisory board, shri jettimalani relies on the decisions of this court in madhav haywadanroo hoskot v. state of maharashtra : 1974crilj1479 . hussainara khatoon v. home secretary, state of bihar : [1975]2scr832 and francis coralie mullin v. the administrator, union territory of delhi : [1974]1scr1 . speaking for the court, krishna iyer, j. ..... law as is referred to in clause (a). we find it quite difficult to understand as to which are the remaining commodities outside the scope of the act of 1980, in respect of which it can be said that the maintenance of their supplies is essential to the community. the particular clause in sub-section (2) .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Kamal Nath and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2000(4)ALT12(SC); JT2000(7)SC19; 2000(5)SCALE69; (2000)6SCC213; [2000]Supp1SCR389; 2000(2)LC1196(SC)

..... notifications.7. in addition to these acts and rules, there are, on the statute book, other acts dealing, in a way, with the environmental laws, for example, the indian forest act, 1927; the forest (conservation) act, 1980; the wildlife (protection) act, 1972 and the rules framed under these acts. various states in india have also ..... during which such contravention continues after conviction for the first such contravention. section 40 speaks of offences by companies while section 41 speaks of offences by government departments.17. all the three acts, referred to above, also contemplate the taking of the cognizance of the offences by the court. thus, ..... the conviction for the first such failure or contravention. section 16 of the act contemplates offences by the companies while section 17 contemplates offences by government departments.16. chapter vi of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 contains the provisions for penalties and procedure. this chapter consists of .....

E.P.F.Commissioner Vs. O.L.of Esskay Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... contribution was declared first charge on the assets of the establishment and became payable in priority to all other debts. however, while inserting section 529a in the companies act by act no.35 of 1985 parliament, in its wisdom, did not declare the workmen's dues (this expression includes various dues including provident fund) as first ..... 31-3-1987, about 1.66 1akh establishments with about 1.38 crore subscribers were covered under the act. 2. the act was last amended in 1976. the government had set up a high level committee in april, 1980 to review the working of the employees' provident funds organisation and to suggest improvements. the committee had ..... made a number of recommendations involving amendment of the act. the central board of trustees, employees' provident fund had also, from time to .....

Ravi Khullar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2334; 2007(3)CTC574; 139(2007)DLT506(SC); JT2007(6)SC25; 2007(5)MhLj545; (2007)4MLJ660(SC); 2007MPLJ205(SC); RLW2007(3)SC2325; 2007(5)SCALE236; (2007)5SCC231; 2007AIRSCW4040; 2007(3)KCCRSN181

..... owners of industrial structures would not be provided any assistance beyond what they may be entitled to as compensation under the act. 33. the second document is the letter of april 16, 1986 written to the chief secretary, delhi administration which refers to a meeting held on april 4, 1986 wherein it was decided that a site may ..... 2scr824 ; indrapuri griha nirman sahakari samiti ltd. v. the state of rajasthan and ors. : [1975]2scr68 ; pt. girharan prasad missir and anr. v. state of bihar and anr. : (1980)2scc83a and h.d. vora v. state of maharashtra and ors. : [1984]2scr693 . following the principles laid down therein the high court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of ..... s case that the notification had been issued mala fide. the procedure laid down in chapter-vii of the act was not attracted since the acquisition was not for any 'company' within the meaning of chapter-vii of the act.9. the high court has also rejected the submission on the ground that it was barred by the principle .....