Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 5,907 results (0.147 seconds)

B.S. Yeddyurappa Vs. the Lokayukta of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... legal status of the special leave petition filed by m/s. v s lad and sons. with reference to the letters of the central government, the above-said companies themselves replied to the ministry of mines, government of india, clarifying that the special leave petition was pending before the supreme court and that there was no stay ..... government to grant mining lease over that area. therefore, the grant of approval of the mining plan was a matter, which was between the central government and the companies and there was no question of making favourable or unfavourable reply from the state government in this regard;(xvii) that the government of india had sent three letters to ..... under sections 7, 8, 9, 13(1)(d) r/w section 13(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1988, and investigation taken is up and there is no merit in the writ petition.11. respondent no.4/the principal secretary to governor of karnataka, has filed statement of objections contending that the petition is not maintainable as it is .....

Fertilizer Corporation Of India Ltd. Vs. M/s. Coromandal Sacks Private ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... v. pharmaceutical products of india ltd. [(2008) 7 scc619 wherein it, in no uncertain terms, held that sica is a special statute and, thus, overrides other acts like the companies act, 1956, stating: (scc p. 635, paras 31-33) 31. sica furthermore was enacted to secure the principles specified in article 39 of the constitution of india ..... v. pharmaceutical products of india ltd. [(2008) 7 scc619 wherein it, in no uncertain terms, held that sica is a special statute and, thus, overrides other acts like the companies act, 1956, stating: (scc p. 635, paras 31-33) 31. sica furthermore was enacted to secure the principles specified in article 39 of the constitution of india ..... for proper implementation thereof; v) constitution of an appellate authority consisting of persons who are or have been supreme court judges, senior high court judges and secretaries to the government of india, etc. for hearing appeals against the order of the board.4. the notes on clauses appended to the bill explain the .....

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

..... in the plaint to be barred by any law'. 3. adverting to the plaintiff's case in the plaint, both plaintiff and defendant are the companies registered under the companies act. the said suit against defendant is filed for the following reliefs (vide paragraph 20 in the plaint):'wherefore, the plaintiff prays that this hon'ble ..... members, who shall hold the office for the prescribed term and subject to prescribed conditions. sub-section (4) states that the registrar of copyrights shall be the secretary of the copyright board, who shall perform such functions as may be prescribed. section 12, though titled as 'powers and procedure of copyright board', it only ..... where the bar is an express one, an examination of the scheme of the act becomes necessary. the question as to the adequacy and sufficiency of the remedies provided is relevant though not conclusive. lord thankerton said in secretary of state v mask and company, 'it is settled law that the exclusion of the jurisdiction of the civil .....

J.M. Malhotra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]89CompCas600(Mad)

..... subject to supervision of court'. the report of the board would become the basis for a proceeding to be continued against the sick industrial company for winding up in accordance with the provisions of the companies act. sub-section (2) of section 20, which is already reproduced, specifically states that the high court shall, on the basis of ..... so submitted by the board and decide as to whether it should proceed and cause to proceed with the winding up of the sick industrial company, in accordance with the provisions of the companies act. this is clear by the use of the words, 'and may proceed and cause to proceed' in sub-section (2) of section ..... or have been supreme court judges, senior high court judges and secretaries to the government of india, etc., for hearing appeals against the orders of the board.' 6. chapter i of the act deals with the preliminaries such as title, extent, commencement and application of the act and the definition clauses. 7. chapter ii deals with the board .....

K.P. Satheesan Vs. the Advocate General, High Court of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1993Ker22

..... india rules, quoted above, prohibits an advocate from being a managing director or secretary of a company. 'company' contemplated therein can only be a company registered under the companes act. as per the provisions of the companies act, the managing director and the secretary of a company are primarily responsible for the affairs of the company. an advocate can be director or chairman of the board of directors of the ..... company. the taboo is only in holding the post of director or secretary of the company. third .....

J Venkatesh Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... shri chandrashekar p., advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, commerce and industries department, room no.106, 1st floor vikasa soudha, bengaluru - 560 001, represented by its principal secretary to government. 6 2. 3.4. karnataka industrial areas development board, (a government of karnataka undertaking) nrupathunga road, bangalore - 560 001. represented by its chairman. the special ..... & others vs. special land acquisition officer (claims), upper krishna project & another, ilr2009kar 4417 para 6. the acquisition of land for a private company is not permitted under the kiad act. reliance is placed on shri 155 ramtanu co-operative housing society limited and another vs. state of maharashtra and others, 1970(3) scc323para 21. ..... far as the law laid down by the 11 judges bench in r.c.cooper case, followed by the constitution bench in ishwari khetan sugar mills, 1980(4) scc163 is not overruled by any other larger bench of the supreme court. thus the law laid down by the 11 judges in r.c. .....

J. Venkatesh Reddy and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

..... and others vs. special land acquisition officer (claims), upper krishna project and another, ilr 2009 kar 4417 para 6. the acquisition of land for a private company is not permitted under the kiad act. reliance is placed on shri ramtanu co-operative housing society limited and another vs. state of maharashtra and others, 1970(3) scc 323 para 21. acquisition ..... collector in form -1. rule 3(3) provides where the requiring body is the government, the request shall be filed by the secretary of the concerned department and in case of public sector undertaking, by the secretary of the department dealing with such undertaking. rule 4 provides for action by the collector on receiving such request. the request has to ..... that in so far as the law laid down by the 11 judges bench in r.c.cooper case, followed by the constitution bench in ishwari khetan sugar mills, 1980(4) scc 163, is not overruled by any other larger bench of the supreme court. thus the law laid down by the 11 judges in r.c.cooper's .....

Firm Shah Kaushik Kumar Ratilal Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1973)1GLR960

..... out the historical background against which the central legislature enacted the forward contracts (regulation) act. in paragraph 12 of the affidavit-in-reply of p. sitaraman. deputy secretary, ministry of industrial development, internal trade and company affairs (department of internal trade) government of india, new delhi, being his affidavit ..... senior research assistant, forward markets commission, government of india, bombay, and (2) the affidavit-in-reply of p. sitaraman, deputy secretary, ministry of industrial development, internal trade ,and company affairs (department of internal trade), government of india, new delhi, mention the circumstances under which the notification dated december 24, 1964 ..... the other letter dated december 14, 1964 also from a. s. naik, chairman of the commission, addressed to d. n. banerjee, joint secretary to the government of india, ministry of commerce, new delhi, set out the circumstances under which the commission came to recommend to the government that .....

Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1669; [1961]31CompCas387(SC); [1962]2SCR339

..... powers conferred by sub-ss. (5) and (6) of s. 111 of the companies act, 1956, and directed that the company do register the transfers. in so directing, the deputy secretary gave no reasons. against the orders passed by the deputy secretary, with special leave under art. 136 of the constitution, these two appeals are preferred by ..... again declined, and appeals were filed before the central government under s. 111(3) of the companies act, 1956, which had come into force from april 1, 1956. these appeals were heard by mr. k. r. p. aiyengar, joint secretary, ministry of finance, who dismissed them, holding that only a suit was the appropriate remedy. 29 ..... in the names of the transferees. against this action of the company, appeals were preferred to the central government under s. 111, clause (3), of the companies act, 1956, which had since been brought into operation on april 1, 1956. k. r. p. ayyangar, joint secretary, ministry of finance, who heard the appeals declined to order registration .....

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. V.K. Goel and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi260

..... /s. swadeshi polytex limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), defendant no. 2 in the suit/appellant before us, is a public limited company duly incorporated under the companies act. shri v. k. goel, plaintiff in the suit, is a registered shareholder of 50 equity shares of rs. 10 each in the company. the secretary of the company issued on january 23, 1986, a notice for holding ..... the 16th annual general meeting of the company on march 15, 1986, at its registered .....