Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 133 amendment of other enactment Court: kerala Page 11 of about 165 results (0.118 seconds)

V. Hariharan Pillai Vs. State of Kerala Represented by Its Chief Secre ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1968Ker42; (1967)ILLJ766Ker

..... in rules 14 to 17 of the general rules under part ii of the kerala state and subordinate services rules 1958. as amended will be observed 'in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the commission (2nd respondent) it has referred to the correspondence that passed between the government and itself in the matter of making recruitments. in ..... not justiciable in these proceedings. the limited grounds open to judicial review in matters of this type were recently examined by the supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board, civil appeal no. 381 of 1966 d/- 4-5-1966 = (reported in air 1967 sc 295). the supreme court observed:'though an order passed in ..... contended that the governor has no power to pass rules retrospectively under theproviso to article 309 of the constitution. in any case, it is argued, the state government acting under rule 14 of the general rules is really only a delegate and can in no event pass a notification with retrospective effect. it is also contended that .....

Padmanabhan Vs. Kerala State Handloom Development Corporation Limited

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ1226Ker

..... with the inquiry under article 311(2). it will be noted that before the forty second amendment of 1976, a second opportunity against the proposed punishment was necessary, and the position was the same under section 240(3) of the government of india act, 1935 as interpreted by the privy council in high commissioner for india v. i. ..... of article 14 of the constitution of india, as it did not confirm to principles of natural justice. it was observed that the right of government companies and public corporations which are state instrumentalities under article 12, that employees cannot be governed by the i general principle of master and servant as to ..... 4. point no. 1: the appellant is an officer of the kerala state handloom development corporation ltd. it was registered as a company under the indian companies act, 1956. it is a state owned company.5. the regulation relating to the disciplinary inquiry is contained in paragraph 4.17 which deals with penalties. sub-clause (i) enumerates .....

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ218

..... an industrial area. petitioner submits that with effect from 24-07-2001 the second respondent panchayat ceased to have any jurisdiction over the kanjikode unit of the petitioner company by virtue of the express provisions of section 1(2) of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994. petitioner was however served with ext. p4 notice dated 20- ..... sources in the panchayat as one of its mandatory duties to safeguard public interest. it is stated that the panchayat raj act was enacted by the state legislature consequent on the constitution (seventy third amendment) act, 1992 for securing a greater measure of participation of the people in planned development and under article 243g the legislature ..... it can declare that an industrial area as defined in the gujarat industrial development act, 1962 would also be a deemed notified area under the gujarat municipalities act, 1963. with effect from 1-6-1993, the constitution 73rd and 74th amendments came into effect as a result of which parts ix and ix-a were .....

M.R.F. Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2006]148STC212(Ker)

..... issued another notification, s.r.o. no. 271/96 dated march 13, 1996 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 of the kgst act amending s.r.o. no. 1729/93 and exempting tax payable on the products of raw rubber by medium and large scale industrial units manufacturing tyres within ..... of revenue.11. the counsel placing reliance on the decision of the apex court in assistant commissioner of commercial taxes (asst.), dharwar v. dharmendra trading company [1988] 70 stc 59 submitted that the assistant commissioner and the deputy commissioner (sales tax) are bound by the orders or notifications issued by the government ..... years from commencement of commercial production on december 30, 1996 to december 29, 2003. the petitioner submitted that acting on the orders issued by the second respondent and the memorandum of understanding signed between the second respondent-government, petitioner has made huge investment for expansion particularly for the manufacture of compound rubber. the counsel .....

international Computers-Indian Manufacture Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2004]135STC419(Ker)

..... biriyumma reported in [1991] 83 stc 276.'in the above view of the matter, the tribunal held that hire charges received by the appellant-company after april 1, 1984 is rightly assessed under the kgst act for the years 1984-85 and 1985-86. in the appeals for the years 1988-89, 1989-90 and 1990-91 the tribunal observed that ..... clause will not prejudice any right of icim to damages or any other icim's rights or remedies.'on the basis of the above clause we find that the second portion of the agreement, namely, leasing arrangements and actual leasing thereon is of running contract nature and the limitation canvassed by the learned advocate for the appellant is ..... the tribunal.'(i) the agreements for the transfer of right to use computer system were entered before april 1, 1984 and since the amendment of the definition of 'sale' in the kerala general sales tax act came into force only with effect from april 1, 1984 the transactions for transferring right to use the computer system are out of the .....

V.G. Padmanabhan Vs. The Special Officer, Thalassery Primary Co-Operat ...

Court : Kerala

..... democratic spirit. the entire constitutional and statutory endeavour is to keep the governmental interference to a minimum. 57. eloquent are the preamble to the act and the 97th constitutional amendment: the former exhorts that it is essential to organise the co-operative societies in accordance with co-operative principles as the self-governing, democratic institutions ..... it would be made clear that in the face of the continued operation of clause 6, the disqualification visits upon the members. 64. farfetched the second proposition may appear. i am of the firm opinion that the co-operative spirit of the institution demands that it should ensure the participation of maximum ..... challenge against the bye-laws at the earliest point in time if they were aggrieved. 27. drawing my attention to exhibit p9 resolution passed in the second general body meeting of the society, the learned counsel would strenuously contend that once the bye-laws have been approved and registered, the general body is .....

Jaya Balagangadharan Vs. The State of Kerala represented by The Chief ...

Court : Kerala

..... , sub-section (1), as being needed or likely to be needed for a public purpose or for a company may, 1.1. substituted for "within thirty days after the issue of the notification' by the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984. [within thirty days from the date of the publication of the notification], object to the acquisition of ..... is requested that necessary sanctioning orders may be given for the acquisition of 250 acres of land in vailoor village (block-3) (survey nos. as in letter 2nd cited) invoking urgency clause for the science park by kerala state industrial development corporation limited". the relevant board note and decision of the board in its meeting held ..... it arises only in two counts. first, if the impugned action had been taken with the specific object of damaging the interest of the aggrieved party and secondly to help another party which results in damage to the party alleging malafides. unless factual basis is available to infer such malafides, the court cannot proceed to .....

P.N.Kunjumon Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... meeting within the stipulated time. therefore, it is contended that the omission to hold the annual general body meeting itself is a grave omission under the amendment act that justifies the impugned action. apart from the above, there are other irregularities in the manner of functioning of the society as evident from the irregularities ..... with law. it is also clear that had the present proceedings not been initiated, no action to rectify the discrepancies also would have been taken. the 2nd respondent has not accepted the explanation of the petitioner. it cannot be said that the allegations are frivolous or insignificant. in the totality of the circumstances ..... furnished to the petitioner. the petitioner submitted explanation, ext.p3, denying the allegations. however, the explanation was not accepted. as per ext.p10 order, the 2nd respondent superseded the committee and appointed an administrator to be in charge of the administration of the society.3. the petitioner then filed w.p(c) no .....

George Vs. thekkekkara Vareed

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1979Ker1

..... has arisen, till such question is decided by the land tribunal and any such injunction granted or appointment made before the commencement of the kerala land reforms (amendment) act, 1969, or before such question has arisen, shall stand cancelled.(8) in this section, 'civil court' shall include a rent control court as defined in ..... should be held to cover distress and execution proceedings in the ordinary courts. in our view, such proceedings are other legal proceedings against the company, as contrasted with ordinary suits against the company.' the comprehensiveness of the scope of 'legal proceeding' thus expounded had been somewhat qualified in s. v. kondaskar, offl. liquidator v. v ..... has occasioned a failure of justice (vide the principle of sections 21 & 99 of the c. p. c.). we are not prepared to say, in second appeal, that the discretion exercised by the lower appellate court in remanding the proceedings was unsound. new rights had intervened, and a new forum of adjudication had .....

The Catholic Bank of India Ltd., (In Liquidation) Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1968Ker3

..... seen, the benefit of sub-section (2) is not available one of the objects of the amending act, act 2 of 1961, was to curtail the benefits given to the debtor by the original act in so far as debts due to banking companies were concerned and the debtor must pay in the eight instalments specified in the proviso to section ..... (xi) thereof the second is that this exclusion in favour of banking companies is discriminatory and that, therefore, the excluding clause, not mark you the statute itself, must be struck down, notwithstanding that to take away an exclusion is to add, and that the result would be to extend the provisions of the act through the judicial process ..... reference to debts due to a banking company as defined in the banking companies act. 1949 in sub-section (2) of section 4 and sub-section (1) (b) of section 5 must, therefore, be to the debts falling under the first or the second of the three categories mentioned in paragraph 5 above12. counsel for the respondent drew our .....