Court : Karnataka
..... (for short 'company'), a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and registered in the state of karnataka, when accused of commission of offence of failure to pay contribution under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short) which he was liable to pay under section 85(a) of the act, in c.c.no. 176/2013 before the special ..... annexure-j. 5. the director of esic, is said to have by order dated 20.08.2013 accorded sanction under section 86a(1) of the act to prosecute the company and its directors for commission of offence under section 85(a) of the act, alleging that the petitioner and others being 'principal employer' were responsible and liable to pay ..... sought to be prosecuted, is arraigned as the 1st accused in c.c.no. 176/2013, as the principal employer. however, in view of section 86-a of the act, providing for prosecution of others in the case of a company, as vicariously liable, at the threshold, the complaint petition must disclose an allegation that they .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... (for short 'company'), a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and registered in the state of karnataka, when accused of commission of offence of failure to pay contribution under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short) which he was liable to pay under section 85(a) of the act, in c.c.no. 176/2013 before the special ..... annexure-j. 5. the director of esic, is said to have by order dated 20.08.2013 accorded sanction under section 86a(1) of the act to prosecute the company and its directors for commission of offence under section 85(a) of the act, alleging that the petitioner and others being 'principal employer' were responsible and liable to pay ..... sought to be prosecuted, is arraigned as the 1st accused in c.c.no. 176/2013, as the principal employer. however, in view of section 86-a of the act, providing for prosecution of others in the case of a company, as vicariously liable, at the threshold, the complaint petition must disclose an allegation that they .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... respondents prayer in o.s.a.nos.463 and 464/2012: original side appeals are filed under order xxxvi rule 9 of os rules and under section 483 of companies act, 1956 r/w clause 15 of the letters patent against the orders dated 06.01.2011 and 03.03.2005 made in c.a.nos.1701 of ..... , high court, madras, as official liquidator for anubhav plantations limited (in liquidation) 2.m.ravindran, senior advocate, administrator, anubhav group of companies, (in liquidation) : appellants vs. r.vijayakumar : respondent o.s.a.no.61/2013: ---------------- state represented by the superintendent of police, cbcid, sterling complex, guindy, chennai-600 032. : appellant vs. 1.r.vijayakumar 2. ..... passed earlier or to quash the criminal prosecution.12. the learned additional government pleader appearing on behalf of the appellant in o.s.a.no.61 of 2013 would contend: (i) the police registered a case and conducted detailed investigation, pursuant to the order passed by the learned single judge. the police collected .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... subject lands having been duly converted ana registered as bbmp katha nos.197/375 for an extent of 47916 sq.ft. and submitted notifications u/sec: 3(1), 1(3) and 28(1) of the kiad act. the company has deposited 40% of the tentative cost of rs.83,77,600=00 vide receipt no.31998 dated 19/10/2012, and entered into ..... two weeks from the date of that order before the special land acquisition officer ('slao') without waiting for any notice under sub-section (2) of section 28 of the kiad act and to appear before the slao on 18/07/2013 at 3.00p.m. pursuant to the liberty granted by the learned single judge, the appellant filed its objections before the slao ..... to the member secretary, state pollution control board, seeking his opinion on lhe proposed project. according to learned counse1 for the appellant, that letter was dispatched only on 28/08/2013. it was stated that it was only on 13/08/2012 that the requisite fee was deposited by the respondent - educational trust. that 15/08/2012 was a public .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... .k.udayakumar 2.icici lombard general insurance co. ltd., no.84/85, walltax road, chennai 600 003. ... respondents appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicles act 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2013 made in m.a.c.t.o.p.no.2677 of 2010, on the file of motor accidents claims tribunal (chief judge, small ..... 80 years. accordingly, entries have been made. charge sheet has also been filed on 09.06.2010, against the driver of the van, insured with the respondent-insurance company. quite contrary to the declaration made in ex.p1 fir and ex.r2 accident register, the appellant, in order to enrich himself, has unjustly reduced the age of the ..... been marked as exs.r1 and r2.4. on evaluation of pleadings and evidence, the claims tribunal found that the driver of the van, insured with the appellant-insurance company, was negligent in causing the accident. on the aspect of quantum of compensation, upon perusal of ex.p1 fir and ex.r2 accident register, the claims tribunal, fixed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... documentary as well as circumstantial, has been gathered against the petitioner to prove the charge for commission of offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of pmla. statement of ashok chotalal gandhi, an employee of sbl group of companies clearly shows the cash payments made by sbl group to the petitioner. further, petitioner is the only bank official whose ..... utilized the illicit money to the tune of 1,15,00,000/- for purchasing a residential flat at indore for a sum of 36.85 lakh on 28th march, 2013, a residential house at chandralok colony for 1 crore which was further sold for a sum of 1,10,27,000/- to some other person on 29th september, ..... rotating it through various shell companies received the money in rag buildtech owned by his son, shares whereof were then inflated and from the money infused in rag buildtech various properties, movable and immovable, were purchased.8. charge-sheet for offence punishable under sections 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the pc act is yet to be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... . the crux of the department's case is that the works contracts of the petitioner executed between october 2007 and may 2008 are taxable under section 65 (105)(zzzza) of the finance act, as amended with effect from 01.06.2007. those works contract involve composite supply of goods as well as services in the course of erection ..... for the petitioner and mr.m.santhanakrishnan, learned senior central government standing counsel appearing for the respondents.2. the petitioner-company calls in question an order passed by the 4th respondent in order no.400432013, dated 25.02.2013 in the petitioner's condone delay application not st/cod/191/11 in appeal not st/230/2011, seeking to ..... the high court of judicature at madras date:02. 04.2013 coram: the honourable mr.justice v.dhanapalan w.p.no.6366 of 2013 and m.p.nos.1 and 2 of 2013 m/s.kone elevator india pvt. ltd., no.50, vanagaram road, ayanambakkam, chennai-600 095. represented by its company secretary .. petitioner vs.1. the secretary ministry of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... effect that the order is sufficient proof of the claim of the corporation in the proceedings by the insurance court under section 75 of the act arises. 22 m.f.a.no.7749/2013 30. section 75(1)(g) of the act provides for the esi court to decide the dispute between the employer and the corporation in respect of contribution payable etc ..... , if the reliever of the security guard failed to report, such security guards would continue to work even after his shift hours. but he says that the applicant company was not paying extra money for the same. the evidence of aw.4 falsifies the appellants contention that their employees never used to work overtime and they were not ..... the conveyance charges and subscribe his signature in the conveyance register. but no document was produced to show that he was working as security guard in the appellant company either in 1992 or during the relevant period namely april 1997 to july 2000. in the cross-examination he admits that he has no document to show that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... rs. 3000 crore. 4. the remand application dated 9th august 2018 inter alia notes that since according to the sfio, the... petitioner appeared to have committed offences punishable under section 447 of companies act 2013 , the... petitioner was arrested on 8th august 2017 at 1930 hours, in accordance with law. it is further averred: he was explained the grounds of arrest. however he refused ..... to an order dated 3rd may 2016 issued by the ministry of corporate affairs ( mca ), government of india under section 212 (1) (c) of the companies act, 2013 ( companies act ) which directed investigation into not only the affairs of bsl and bspl but thirteen other group companies, twelve of bspl and one of bsl. the transactions which were asked to be investigated were for the period between .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of ..... regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in ..... dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of .....
Tag this Judgment!