Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 2013 section 278 effect of winding up order Sorted by: recent Court: jharkhand Page 2 of about 11 results (0.290 seconds)

Dec 18 2017 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Gupta Vs. Union of India Through the Central Bureau of Inv ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8699 of 2017 ---- Sunil Kumar Gupta son of late Ram Babu Gupta, resident of Plot No.7, Poornima (Riverside) Kadru, P.O. and P.S. Argora, District Ranchi. Petitioner -versus- Union of India through the Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI) Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and th...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2017 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Pal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7802 of 2017 ---- Vinod Kumar Pal son of late Ram Narayan Pal, resident of Daltangra, P.O. Kamre Tiril, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi (Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and thereafter transferred the Income Tax Files of several assesses from Kolkata to ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2017 (HC)

Jalsu Rautiya Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 1869 of 2004 (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 29.09.2004, passed by the Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial Case No.60 of 2004.) ------- Jalsu Rautiya .. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, Addl. P.P. -------- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------- CAV on 27.11.2017 Pronounced on :18. 12.2017 Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.- In this appeal, the sole appellant is aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.09.2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial Case No.60 of 2004 corresponding to G.R. Case No.42 of 2004 whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the p...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2017 (HC)

Sujoy Ghosh Dastidar Vs. Dayita Ghosh Dastidar

Court : Jharkhand

1 First Appeal No. 161 of 2011 ------ [An application under Section 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984] Sujoy Ghosh Dastidar .... .... . Appellant Versus Dayita Ghosh Dastidar .... .... .... Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Rajivnandan Sahay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate Mr. S.P. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI By Court Heard learned counsel for the appellant.2. The respondent has not appeared despite service of notice on three occasions. It is pertinent to mention here that the Matrimonial Suit No.406 of 2010 instituted by the husband/appellant herein was decided ex-parte as despite service of notice including through paper publication, the respondent did not appear to contest the suit as per the order dated 18th July, 2011 passed by the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur.3. The app...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2017 (HC)

Vikas Vidyalaya and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4672 of 2010 1. Vikas Vidyalaya, Neori, Ranchi, through its authorized signatory, Arup Kumar Mukhopadhyay 2. Arup Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Principal, Vikas Vidyalaya, Neori, Ranchi .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Additional Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Collector, Ranchi 5. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: M/s Indrajit Sinha, Vipul Poddar, Roopa Mitra For the Respondents: M/s Atanu Banerjee (G.A), S.K.Ghosh (J.C to G.A) ----- C.A.V on 30.11.2017 Pronounced on 15.12.2017 RAJESH SHANKAR,J The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notification contained in Letter No. 10/DLA Ra...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2017 (HC)

Vikas Vidyalaya and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4672 of 2010 1. Vikas Vidyalaya, Neori, Ranchi, through its authorized signatory, Arup Kumar Mukhopadhyay 2. Arup Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Principal, Vikas Vidyalaya, Neori, Ranchi .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Additional Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Collector, Ranchi 5. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: M/s Indrajit Sinha, Vipul Poddar, Roopa Mitra For the Respondents: M/s Atanu Banerjee (G.A), S.K.Ghosh (J.C to G.A) ----- C.A.V on 30.11.2017 Pronounced on 15.12.2017 RAJESH SHANKAR,J The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notification contained in Letter No. 10/DLA Ra...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2017 (HC)

Dr Jamshed J Irani and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.245 of 2016 ---- 1. Dr. Jamshed J.Irani 2. Amar Inder Singh Dhillon Petitioners -versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Inspector of Factories, Jamshedpur Circle-I, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). Opposite Parties ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1011.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1512.2017 In this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings, initiated as against the petitioners in connection with C/2 Case No.2903 of 2001, including the order dated 15.05.2001, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur whereby cognizance was taken for an offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act and summons were directed to be issued against the petitioners.2. The case arises out of Factories Act. An accident had t...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Shiv Dutt Sharma Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2631 of 2016 Shiv Dutt Sharma .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Allahabad Bank, through its Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office, Deoghar .. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. For the Allahabad Bank: Mrs. A.R. Choudhary, Advocate. --------- Reserved On :12. 12/2017 Pronounced On :14. 12/2017 1. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with R.C. No. 01(A) of 2013-EOW-R, registered under Sections 120B / 420 of the I.P.C. and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, lodged on the basis of one written report given by Prakash Chandra Garnayak, Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office, Allahabad Bank, Deoghar addressed to Superintendent of Police, CBI, Economic Offence Wing dated 25.04.2013 alleging that the informant is duly authorized by the bank to file ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2017 (HC)

Aquilur Rahman Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Ministry of Minority ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 35 of 2017 Federal Anjuman Islamia through their president Md. Nesar, S/o Late Abdul Rauf, R/o Dr. Fateullah Lane, Kalal Toli, Ranchi, P.O.- Church Road, P.S. Lower Bazar, Dist. Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the ministry of the Welfare Minority Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O.Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist.- Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Ministry of the Welfare Minority, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist. Ranchi 3.Jharkhand State Sunni Wakf Board, through its Chairman having registered office at Audrey House, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, Dist. Ranchi 4.The Chief Executive Officer, Jharkhand State Sunni Wakf Board, Ranchi, Audrey House, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, Dist. Ranchi 5.The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, Office at Collectariat Building Kutchery Chowk, P.O. Kutchery, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi 6.The S.D.O. Sadar, Ranchi Offic...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2017 (HC)

Federal Anjuman Islamia Through Their President Md Nesar Vs. The State ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 35 of 2017 Federal Anjuman Islamia through their president Md. Nesar, S/o Late Abdul Rauf, R/o Dr. Fateullah Lane, Kalal Toli, Ranchi, P.O.- Church Road, P.S. Lower Bazar, Dist. Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the ministry of the Welfare Minority Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O.Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist.- Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Ministry of the Welfare Minority, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist. Ranchi 3.Jharkhand State Sunni Wakf Board, through its Chairman having registered office at Audrey House, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, Dist. Ranchi 4.The Chief Executive Officer, Jharkhand State Sunni Wakf Board, Ranchi, Audrey House, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, Dist. Ranchi 5.The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, Office at Collectariat Building Kutchery Chowk, P.O. Kutchery, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi 6.The S.D.O. Sadar, Ranchi Offic...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //