Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7286 of 2017 --- M/s Hindalco Industries Limited .... ...... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... ...... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Adv. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ashish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Mukta Dutta, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Adv. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.G. Mr. H.K. Mehta, A.A.G. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A. Mr. Chanchal Jain, JC to A.G. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, J.C to A.G. --- 05/12.01.2018 I.A. No. 231 of 2018 A strange application has been filed. Seeking exemption from filing compliance report in terms of order dated 04.01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No. 7286 of 2017, the respondents have filed this application.2. The learned Advocate-General submits that under the High Court Rules period of limitation for filing appeal against an order passed by the Single Judge of this Court is 30 days and an appeal vide L.P.A. No. 10...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 In W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015) & (In W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Ramgarh.6. District Mining Officer, Ramgarh. Respondents In W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Dhanbad.6. Distri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1341 of 2015 .. Trilok Singh ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Bhupinder Singh ...Opp. Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : - M/s Indrajeet Sinha & Arpan Mishra, Advs. For the Opp. Parties :- Mr. Vikash Kishore, Adv. . 02/10.01.2018 The instant petition seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.02.2015 rendered by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case No. 96/2007 whereunder the sole accused/opposite party no. 2 has been acquitted of the charges under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is suffering from a delay of 69 days. However, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length on the grounds of challenge and gone through the materials on record and also perused the impugned judgment. Briefly stated the prosecution case lodged by the complainant being Sakchi P. S. Case...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6870 of 2007 Godnath Mahto, Son of Late Madho Mahto, Resident of Village-Balsagra, P.O. Balsagra, P.S. Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. ....... Petitioner Versus 1. The Central Coalfields Limited through its Managing Director, Darbhanga House, Ranchi. 2.The Director Personnel, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi. 3.The Project Officer, Topa Colliery, Topa Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. 4.The General Manager, Topa Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr.Gautam Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mrs. Ranjana Mukherjee, Adv. . CAV on 01/11/2017 Pronounced on 10/01 /2018 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 02.08.2007 vide Annexure-3 and letter dated 19.09.2007 vide Annexure-4, whereby the da...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 206 of 2017 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dhanbad. through the Manager. ..... Appellant Versus 1. Sundhia Devi 2. Vijay Rajak 3. Ajay Rajak 4. Preeti Kumari 5. Tusiya Devi 6. Manju Devi 7. Bulu Devi 8. Aarti Devi . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Appellant : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate ----- 6/5.01.2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company, learned counsel for the claimants respondents Nos. 1 to 7, and learned counsel for the respondent No.8, the owner of the offending truck.2. This appeal is directed against the impugned Award dated 3.10.2016, passed by the MACT, Dhanbad, in Title (M.V.) Claim case No.46 of 2014, arising out of a case of death due to accident by the offending truck, wherein the claimants respondents have been awarded the compensati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arbitration Application No. 24 of 2017 .... MPD Industries Pvt. Ltd., Indore (Madhya Pradesh) Through its Authorised Signatory Debasis Bhattacharjee, Baghbazar, Kolkata. --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through its Chairman 2. Executive Director, SAIL Refractory Unit (SRU) Indira Gandhi Marg, District Bokaro. --- --- Respondents --- CORAM : The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Adv. --- 11/05.01.2018 Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 15 th September 2017 and 8th December 2017, the proposed Arbitrator namely Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Jaya Roy (Retd.), Former Judge of this Court has submitted a declaration which is at Flag-Z being letter dated 3 rd January 2018. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the appointment of proposed Arbitrator can formally be made for adjudication of the dispute between the parties...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No.7286 of 2017 --- M/s Hindalco Industries Limited .... ...... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. .... ..... Respondents --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --- For the Petitioner : Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashish Prasad, Advocate Mr. Amit Bhandari, Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate Ms. Mukta Dutta, Advocate Mr. V.K. Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate-General Mr. Himanshu Kr. Mehta, A.A.G. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A-IV Mr. Sharad Kaushal, JC to A.A.G. Mr. Sameer Sahay, JC to A.G. --- Oral Order 04/04.01.2018 Notice.2. Mr. Sharad Kaushal, the learned State counsel appears and waives service of notice.3. Mr. H.K. Mehta, the learned Additional Advocate-General tenders a copy of a chart which would disclose payment made by some of the lessees, in purported compliance of demand letters issued by the competent authority of the Governmen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7351 of 2017 Santosh Shah @ Santosh Chowdhury............... Petitioner Versus Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Opp. Party Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. K.P.Deo, Advocate ORDER C.A.V. On 12/12/2017 Delivered On 18/12/2017 07/18.12.2017 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI.2. The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing offence punishable under Section 120B & 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Section , 7, 12, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act in connection with R.C. AC1 2017 A0003(RC3A)/2017 D), pending in the Court of Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi.3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7390 of 2017 ---- Tarun Roy son of late Ram Swaroop Roy, resident of Sukhdeo Nagar, Near Akhil Memorial School, Ratu Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi-834005(Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Ranchi Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with oth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7287 of 2017 ---- Ranjit Kumar Lal @ Ranjeet Kumar Lal son of late Bindeshwari Prasad, resident of Mohalla New Sehdev Nagar, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi-834005 (Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Ranchi Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and t...
Tag this Judgment!