Commodity Contract - Judgment Search Results

Armour Packing Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rendered wholly ineffective by deciding that a carrier may avoid those prohibitions by making a contract for the sale of a commodity stipulating for the payment of a fixed price in the future and thereby acquiring the ..... public defined in the statute if the rates are subject to secret alteration by special agreement then the statute will fail of its purpose to establish a rate duly published known .....

Pierce Vs. Creecy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... employee of any corporation or corporations the purpose and effect of which combination contract or agreement would be a conspiracy to defraud as defined in section 1 of this act or ..... party to any pool trust agreement contract combination or confederation to fix or limit the amount of supply or quantity of any article of manufacture mechanism merchandise commodity convenience repair or any product .....

Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

not be changed during the progress of the work the contractor shall be required to supply the lumber for the necessary

P.R. and Co. Vs. Bhagwandas Chaturbhuj

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR1113

for which plaintiffs are responsible and it cannot affect the contract in such a case the circumstances would seeni to bear

Monosseh Jacob Monosseh Vs. Shapurji Hormusji Harver

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR1004

entering into a contract than he is under the indian contract act but the rule which now prevails both at law

Jagar Nath Singh and ors. Vs. Lalta Prasad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.562

law on the subject is thus stated in pollock on contracts 6th ed p 73 when an infant has induced persons

Rama Odayan and ors. Vs. Subramania Aiyar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ178

to block up and which the plaintiff had by his contract with the government that is the assumption a right to

Lalta Prasad and anr. Vs. Jagar Nath Singh,

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1909)ILR31All21

was wholly incapable of making contracts section 64 of the contract act therefore does not apply in the case cited the

Bailey Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

and the refusal of any person who enters into such contract to perform such act or service or to cultivate such

Harrison Vs. Sterry

Court: US Supreme Court

contract i e it is the law by which the contract is expounded but the right of priority forms no part