Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: commission of anticipation Court: monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission mrtpc Page 1 of about 8 results (0.112 seconds)

In Re: Anil Starch Products Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1975)45CompCas600NULL

..... to be gathered from government departments with regard to requirements of the defence of india and home and overseas markets, statistics with regard to the anticipated national demands for the article proposed to be produced under the application, about the total licensed capacity in india and the total production.the commission also gathers information from government and private bodies with regard to the possibility of production of such articles in india without foreign technology or machinery ..... notification in this particular case was issued on 24th september, 1973, and the two opponents have entered appearance and sent their information/comments to the commission pursuant to such notification and have also stated that they would like to participate in the public hearing regarding these proposals. ..... regulation 9 provides that the material gathered by the director may be brought on record at such stage of the proceedings as the commission may think fit in which case the commission shall communicate the gist of the said material to the parties concerned and give them an opportunity to rebut the material gathered by the director ..... they are members of the public who are entitled to furnish information and assistance to the commission to the extent permitted by the commission under sections 17 and 18 and other provisions of the act and regulations to enable the commission to discharge its duty of controlling monopolies and preventing concentration of economic power to the common .....

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Usha Sales Private Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... the application filed by the registrar was not in accordance with the mandatory requirements either of regulation 6 of the restrictive trade practices enquiry regulations, 1970, or of regulation 55 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations, 1974 ; that it did not disclose any cause of action and that it was not properly verified as required under regulation 6 read with regulation 4 of the restrictive trade practices regulations, 1970, and ..... /or regulation 55 read with regulation 57 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations, 1974 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as " regulations ").it was also contended that the clauses of the agreement referred to by the registrar in his application did not relate to any restrictive ..... to as the " registrar "), made an application dated the 19th june, 1974, under section 10(a)(iii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as " the act"), to the commission for an enquiry into the alleged restrictive trade practices emanating from certain clauses of an agreement entered into by messrs. ..... but the impact can also be reasonably anticipated on grounds of probability and this anticipation on the grounds of probability can only be on the basis of facts and circumstances against which the trade .....

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1976)46CompCas470NULL

..... in which there was a registered agreement and the question, whether by reason of the registration of the agreement the trade practice to which the agreement related, could be classified as restrictive trade practices, was pertinent and the commission did take the view that an agreement relating to a trade practice which fell under any of the categories under section 33(1) was an agreement relating to a restrictive trade practice as defined under section 2(o). in the case ..... in the case of the respondent itself if there is no area allocation, persons in backward areas will not be able to gets bus and truck chassis manufactured by the respondent and, secondly, the rates of commission allowed to the dealers are so low that there was no scope for competition from dealers in other areas in the country. ..... necessarily involve the minute economic analysis of the circumstances against which the trade practice is set but it does enjoin on the commission the necessity of having broad features of the situation relating to the particular trade in mind.19. ..... the qualifications set out in the earlier paragraphs i agree broadly with the conclusions of my learned colleagues.order of the commission : in the result there will be the following order under section 37(1) of the act ..... but the impact can also be reasonably anticipated on grounds of probability and this anticipation on the grounds of probability can only be on the basis of facts and circumstances against which the trade practice is sought to .....

Director-general Vs. Usha International Ltd. and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... 88 of 1986, dated december 2, 1991, in which it was ruled that even if a trade practice falls under section 36a(3)(b) of the act, the commission has to satisfy itself that the impugned practice is prejudicial to public interest before passing a cease or desist order.25. ..... very correctly, it is pointed out by shri ravinder narain that the commission has to independently examine prejudice to public interest before a cease and desist order is passed. ..... based on the application of the director-general, a notice of enquiry was issued by the commission on june 23, 1986, summarising the charge of unfair trade practices. ..... shri dua anticipated a possible argument of the respondents that in as much as every purchaser received a prize, there was no element of chance.11. ..... the first is a decision of this commission in arora contractors and builders pvt. ..... shri dua requested the commission to draw an adverse inference against the respondents for not having satisfactorily answered the interrogatories served on them by the director-general. ..... the other case cited is also a decision of this commission in disco electronics ltd., in re (u.t.p.e. no. .....

NasiruddIn Vs. Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... when the allotment of the plot was not made to the applicant, he approached this commission and claimed compensation as will be evident by reading paragraph 13 of the aforesaid application.paragraph 13 of the application reads as follows : "13. ..... the scheme in question was advertised in anticipation of availability of land. ..... this order will dispose of the application filed under section 12-b of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 read with regulation 77 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations, 1991. .....

Triveni Borewells Vs. Ingersoll Rand (i) Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... indeed at the relevant time there was no period of limitation under the consumer protection act to prefer a claim before the commission but that does not mean that the claim could be made even after an unreasonably long delay. ..... that this amount was spent by the applicant on the basis of the financial calculations done and in anticipation of profits which would be generated through the borewell drilling business. ..... the petition before the commission was filed on 25.9.1992 that is clearly a decade after a claim had been made before the corporation. ..... the commission has rejected this contention by a wholly wrong approach in taking into consideration that the foreign exchange payable to reserve bank of india was still due and, therefore, the claim is alive. ..... for this reason also we find that the claim made by the respondent ought to have been rejected by the commission. .....

In Re: Excel Industries Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1988)64CompCas531NULL

..... of chemicals and fertilisers and fci about determination of a fair price proved abortive, (ii) that the idea of having a common price originated from the fci, (iii) they increased their capacities in response to anticipated requirements of fci which did not materialize, and (iv) the price ultimately accepted by them in regard to the tender floated in 1980 was reasonable in the context of rising prices. ..... that fci's actual requirement turned out to be very much less than what was anticipated and to meet which, the manufacturers had to invest substantial sums in machinery and ..... held on july 18, 1976--rw 4/1-a) and the second instance, it complains to the commission that the respondents "usually quote their rates together when tenders are invited". ..... of the act are set out below : " for the purposes of any proceedings before the commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say .. ..... in the first stage, the respondents have to satisfy the commission that one or more of the circumstances set out under various ..... the following witnesses appeared before the commission for examination-in-chief, cross-examination and production ..... in the second stage, the commission must be further satisfied that the restriction is not unreasonable having regard to the balance between the aforesaid circumstance(s) and any detriment to the public .....

B.N. Mehrotra Through Director Vs. U.P. Housing Development Board

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... when the allotment of the house was not made to the applicant, he approached this commission and prayed for action as per paragraphs 10 and 11 of the application which read as follows : "10. ..... the said period of three years has been mentioned only in anticipation. .....