Commerce - Judgment Search Results

The Central Board of Industries and Commerce and ors. Vs. Sham Lal Gup ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 14(1978)DLT254

..... was carrying on business under the names and style of the central board of industries commerce at a monthly rent of rs 800 00 per month the tenant did not pay .....

Houchins Vs. Kqed, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

houchins v kqed inc 438 u s 1 1978 u s supreme court houchins v kqed inc 438 u s...

Renuka Pachal Vs. Sm. Chapa Guha Neogi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1978Cal457,83CWN135

sankar prasad mitra c j 1 this matter has been referred to a larger bench by the division bench consisting...

Baru Vs. Dalip Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1391; (1979)1SCC29; 1978(10)LC347(SC)

s murtaza fazal ali j 1 these appeals involve a common question of law and will be disposed of by...

Jalil Ahmad, Etc. Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1979CriLJ514

orderm p saxena j 1 these are four revision applications viz 1091 1092 1093 and 1094 of 1975 against the...

Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Savanji Transport ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1979AP41

to bear his costs in this appeal 13 appeal dismissed commercial claim for damages sections 9 and 10 of carriers act

V.C. Rangadurai Vs. D. Gopalan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC281; (1979)1SCC308; [1979]1SCR1054; 1978(10)LC838(SC)

krishna iyer j 1 we agree wholly with our learned brother sen j that the appellant is guilty of gross...

Department of Revenue Vs. Stevedoring Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of powers principle because it does not restrict the ability of congress to regulate commerce the commerce clause does not state a prohibition it merely grants specific power to congress the ..... above are those activities which involve the actual transportation of goods or commodities in foreign commerce or commerce between the states the transmission of communications from a point within the state to .....

Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. Vs. Rice

Court: US Supreme Court

..... operation of 65 foot doubles burdened and discriminated against interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause at the trial appellants presented extensive uncontradicted evidence that ..... not unconstitutional on either ground because we conclude that they unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce we reverse i appellant raymond motor transportation inc raymond a minnesota corporation .....

City of Philadelphia Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... summary judgment the trial court declared the law unconstitutional because it discriminated against interstate commerce the new jersey supreme court consolidated this case with another reaching the same ..... the appellees argue that not all laws which facially discriminate against out of state commerce are forbidden protectionist regulations in particular they point to quarantine laws which this .....