Skip to content


Commentator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: commentator Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 9,597 results (0.09 seconds)
Apr 03 2003 (HC)

Madan Paswan Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Apr-03-2003

chandra mohan prasad j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment dated 17 10 2001 of the presiding officer...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2003 (HC)

Laxman Singh @ Lachhuman Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Apr-08-2003

chandra mohan prasad j 1 the facts of both these appeals being common they have been heard together and are...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 2003 (HC)

P. Mahendra and Co. Vs. Dena Bank

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-07-2003

Reported in: ILR2004KAR881; [2006]143STC573(Kar)

chandra shekaraiah j 1 this appeal is by the plaintiff challenging the judgment and decree dated 31 3 1998 in...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2003 (HC)

Md. Mustaque Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-04-2003

ravi s dhavan c j and r n prasad j 1 this matter was to be listed upon orders of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2003 (HC)

Khet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-27-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)ALT(Cri)14; RLW2004(1)Raj673; 2003(4)WLC394

h r panwar j 1 this revision petition under section 397 read with section 401 of the code of criminal...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2003 (TRI)

M.A. Sumathi, P. Gopinath and Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Feb-10-2003

Reported in: (2003)42SCL591SAT

..... actual payment of consideration 2 suitable disclosures regarding justification of offer price as mentioned under comments on draft letter of offer 3 procedure for acceptance by unregistered shareholders and persons ..... received from the acsi shareholders and the submissions made by ambit and issued final comments on the draft loo on october 18 2002 approving inter alia the originally announced .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2003 (FN)

Stogner Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-26-2003

..... statutes enacted prior to expiration of preexisting limitations periods consistent with this expectation one commentator noted in 1993 that the question whether to give retroactive effect to the ..... categories is more faithful to the original understanding richard wooddeson the court s preferred commentator discussed these two categories together noting that both principally affect the punishment 2 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 2003 (HC)

Jenson and Nicholson (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Regional Provident Fund ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-18-2003

Reported in: 2004(4)CHN308

..... authority to consider grant of instalment facility passed the aforesaid two orders making observations and comments regarding eligibility of the company to avail itself of the facility of instalments to ..... by regional provident fund commissioner hqrs for central provident fund commissioner 7 the observations and comments made by a c regarding eligibility of the company to avail itself of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2003 (HC)

Sri P.N. Ananthanarayanan Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Secret ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-13-2003

Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ570Mad; (2003)2MLJ633

..... out come of the interview and not by any comments or adverse comments on other issues either by the petitioner or by ..... the government of tamil nadu the petitioner had made inappropriate comments and allegations against the government officials and the said ..... of the reporting officers and the reviewing authority and the comments are uniformly superlative expressions of his integrity efficiency and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 2003 (FN)

Price Vs. Vincent

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-21-2003

..... degree murder reversing in turn the state supreme court determined that the trial judge s comments were not sufficiently final to terminate jeopardy respondent then notified the court of a ..... supreme court then reviewed the context and substance of the trial judge s comments and concluded that the comments were not sufficiently final to constitute a judgment of acquittal terminating jeopardy after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //