Skip to content


Commandant - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: commandant Year: 1951 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.104 seconds)
Jan 04 1951 (HC)

R. Chatterjee Vs. Sub Area Commander H.Q. Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-04-1951

Reported in: AIR1951Mad777; (1951)1MLJ258

..... direction from the army headquarters to the headquarters of the southern command the petnr s term of service was extended for a further ..... detention the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the sub area commander of madras sets forth six charges against the petnr of which ..... approval of the g o c in chief of the army command concerned be compulsorily deferred on the grounds that maintenance of discipline .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1951 (HC)

Krishna Khandelwal and anr. Vs. Director of Land Hiring and Disposal E ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-17-1951

Reported in: AIR1952Cal16,56CWN306

..... calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why a writ in the nature of mandamus should not be issued and possession of the premises mentioned in the petition should not ..... the rule are 1 director of land hirings and disposal eastern command 2 assistant director of land hirings and disposal eastern command 3 state manager government of india states calcutta area 4 land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 1951 (HC)

Nani Lal Roy Vs. Satyendra Nath Roy

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-18-1951

Reported in: AIR1952Cal1,55CWN636

harries c j 1 this is an appeal from a judgment and order of banerjee j dated 3rd march 1949...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1951 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Elbridge Watson

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-23-1951

Reported in: AIR1952Cal601,56CWN232,[1951]20ITR400(Cal)

act which the person holding a public office is being commanded to do 13 i would like to make the same

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 1951 (HC)

Asiatic Engineering Co. Vs. Achhru Ram and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-10-1951

Reported in: AIR1951All746

..... by the custodian of the property we are refusing mandamus because in our opinion we ought not to exercise our discretion in favour of a ..... when dealing with the issue of a writ of mandamus we said the powers under this article that is article 226 should be sparingly ..... s bench to judges or officers of inferior courts commanding them to return the records of a cause pending before them initially it was a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 1951 (HC)

Baghat Transport Service Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Himachal Prade ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-22-1951

Reported in: AIR1951HP36

orderchowdhry j 1 these are seven apolns for writs of mandamus and prohibition under article 226 const ind the appcts...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 1951 (SC)

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-23-1951

Reported in: [1951]2SCR747

..... other than parliament itself if such power to issue binding commands may lawfully be granted by parliament to the executive or ..... other than parliament itself if such power to issued binding commands may lawfully be granted by parliament to the executive or ..... subordinate authority is due to no other authority than the command of the legislature itself therefore short of self effacement the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1951 (HC)

Lal Chand Vs. the Collector of Sirmur and anr.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-29-1951

Reported in: AIR1952HP16

chowdhry j c 1 this is an application by one lal chand under article 226 of the constitution of india...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1951 (HC)

Chotey Lal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-16-1951

Reported in: AIR1951All228

of the king s bench division of the h c commanding a body or person to do that which is its

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 1951 (HC)

D. Parraju Vs. General Manager, B.N. Railway and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-16-1951

Reported in: AIR1952Cal610,56CWN264

orderdas j 1 this rule was issued on 18 5 1951 calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //