Skip to content


Collusive - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: collusive Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.012 seconds)
Feb 05 2002 (HC)

Mehta Suraya and I.P.M. Industries Limited and ors. Vs. United Investm ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-05-2002

Reported in: AIR2002Cal108,(2002)2CALLT272(HC)

..... the ejectment suit filedby mehta suraya against uic according to ipm ors the ejectment suitwas collusively filed and the ejectment decree was obtained fraudulentlysuppressing the existence of more than 17 ..... to conclude about the existence of the prima facie case with regard to fraud and collusion in jagadguru guru siddhaswami guru gangadhar swami guru sauirmath v the dakshina maharashtra digambar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2002 (HC)

Sri Bibhuti Bhusan Dutta Vs. Dr. Samarendra Nath Misra

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-18-2002

Reported in: (2003)1CALLT209(HC)

..... aggravates further when a third party dispossessed in execution raises a question of fraud and collusion in obtaining police help for his dispossession 6 2 the question pertaining to the validity ..... landlord and tenant between the appellant and dr samarendra nath misra and the question of collusion and fraud between dr samarendra nath misra and smt archana misra in obtaining the dispossession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2002 (HC)

Dr. Chandra Mohan Singhal and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-25-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)AWC2686

..... was claimed by the revisionists that the entries were obtained in collusion with the revenue officials for illegal gains that the decrees of ..... the said kothi narain rao as before the said fraud and collusion apparent on its face could not divest the governmentof its ..... the defendants in the year 1980 when the aforesaid fraud and collusion of the revenue officials and officers of hamirpur with so called .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 2002 (HC)

Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit Vs. Pushpadevi G. Makharia and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-16-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR249

..... sought to be impleaded as a party that there was any collusion between the appellant and the municipal corporation the court held that ..... sub tenant has the opportunity to ensure that there is no collusion between the landlord and the tenant through whom he claims this ..... the supreme court has adverted to the possible case of a collusion between the plaintiff and the existing defendants to a suit in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2002 (SC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chandigarh Vs. Nicolletta Rohtagi and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-17-2002

Reported in: 2002ACJ1950; AIR2002SC3350; 2002(6)ALD1(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)874; 2002(6)ALT43(SC); 2003(1)AWC23(SC); 2002(3)BLJR2143; (2003)95CALLT157(SC); 95(2003)CLT157(SC); [2002]112Co

..... any inquiry the claims tribunal is satisfied that a there is collusion between the personmaking the claim and the person againstwhom the claim ..... the grounds available to the insured when either there is a collusion between the claimants and the insured or when the insured has ..... award on merits however in a situation where there is a collusion between the claimants and the insured or the insured does not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2002 (HC)

Ramanivas Gupta and ors. Vs. Maliram

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-16-2002

Reported in: 2002(5)ALD362; 2003(3)ALT787

..... to be added as parties to that suit to prevent the collusive decree being was passed dismissed by the trial court and was ..... 1st defendant in many a case the vendor by himself or in collusion with the vendee would describe the property sold by him as ..... fide motive approached and promised help to him and the plaintiffs in collusion with the said om prakash gupta fraudulently obtained his and his .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2002 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sakala Veera Bhadraiah and Co ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-18-2002

Reported in: I(2003)ACC118; 2004ACJ1987; 2002(5)ALT258

..... this court therefore if the issue relating to the alleged collusion between kotha hanumantha rao and the plaintiffs and the issue ..... 3 had specifically noted the defendants alleged that there is collusion between the plaintiff no 1 and the insurance inspector because ..... no specific evidence oral or documentary adduced regarding fraud and collusion as alleged by defendant no 1 company against the plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2002 (HC)

Shyamsundar Mishra Vs. Sribatcha Mishra and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: May-17-2002

Reported in: AIR2002Ori178; 94(2002)CLT188; 2002(II)OLR235

..... suit was dismissed for default the original plaintiff has clandestinely in collusion with the settlement authorities might have recorded some lands in his ..... 1 to prove that the suit filed by ambika was a collusive one defendant no 1 has neither filed any documentary evidence nor ..... trial court in this background rightly held that there was no collusion in the suit filed by ambika against ramlal it does .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Mandira Sen (Mandal) Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-17-2002

Reported in: (2003)3CALLT175(HC)

..... petition by filing affidavits in opposition the said respondents apart from denying the allegation of collusion contended that the selection committee had lawfully awarded the appellant marks for the training ..... interview on 2nd july 2000 without raising any objection whatsoever she raised the allegation of collusion only after finding that her chance of being appointed was bleak therefore we are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 2002 (HC)

Envision Engineering Vs. SachIn Infa Enviro Ltd. and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-09-2002

Reported in: AIR2003Guj164; (2002)3GLR379

..... threatened to remove the plaintiff from the project and the defendants in collusion with each other are not giving the details of work to ..... dated january 16 1999 it is denied that defendants are in collusion with each other ultimately it is claimed that plaintiff has no ..... for the plaintiff submitted that defendant nos 1 and 3 are in collusion and therefore even at the instance of one of the joint .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //