Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 8 properties vesting in central government to be freed from mortgages etc Page 5 of about 41 results (0.561 seconds)

Sujana Metal Products Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Panjagutta D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)

..... makes it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the ..... not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and orissa public demands .....

K.S.R.T.C. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT65

..... 1983 sc 239:shri ashok sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with the hollowness or the self-condemnatory nature of .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(7)SCALE590; (2007)4SCC397; 2007(2)LC966(SC)

..... -alia held as follows:25. shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with the hollowness or the self-condemnatory .....

Harsha NitIn Kokate Vs. the Saraswat Co­op. Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2014

..... dr. m faruqui (supra) that the term vest is a word of variable import. in that judgment the right, title and interest of the coke oven plant which is vested in the central government under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was considered. in that case the appeal of the company, in which the right, title and interest of the owners of the plants ..... for which the vesting in possession alone would take place; the ownership would not vest.23. considering some of these judgments it has been held in the case of bharat coking coal ltd. v. karam chand thapar & bros. 2002 (8) scale 388 that the term vest in common english acceptation would mean and imply conferment of ownership of properties upon a person .....

Property Owners' Association and Ors. etc. etc. Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC1668; JT2001(4)SC152; 2001(2)SCALE523; (2001)4SCC455; 2001(2)LC858(SC)

..... he has said in his judgment in this regard'.5. the need to interpret article 39(b) again arose in the case of sanjeev coke . and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 . while upholding the validity of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the two other connected enactments the constitution bench adopted the interpretation of article 39(b) as enunciated by krishna iyer, ..... of the opinion that the views expressed in sanjeev coke's case require reconsideration. keeping in view the importance of the point in issue, namely, the interpretation of article 39(b) it will be appropriate if these ..... the interpretation put on article 39(b) by krishna iyer, j. in ranganatha reddy's case was not specifically assented to in the majority decision but in sanjeev coke's case (supra) it is the observations in the judgment of krishna iyer, j. which have been followed.7. having heard the counsel at length, we are .....

Kripa Shankar Dwivedi Son of Shri Ranjit Ram and ors. Vs. U.P. State E ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ687All

..... in the central government and subsequently in the bharat coking coal company ltd. both were made respondents before the tribunal. the award was delivered subsequently reinstating the employee with back wages fixing ..... represented by the bihar colliery kamgar union and bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. reported in air 1978 sc 979 : 1978 (37) flr page 144 wherein similar situation arose. industrial dispute with regard to dismissal of some of the employees of the new dharmaband colliery was pending on the date of enforcement of coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. the new dharmaband colliery which vested .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. North Tetulmari Colliery Comp

Court : Patna

..... two civil revision applications have been referred to division bench for decision as to whether the order passed by the appellate authority under section 23(1) of (the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act) is revisable by the high court under section 115 of the code of civil procedure.2. as the point ..... for the state in which the coking coal mine or coke oven plant, as the case may be, is situated and such appeal shall be heard and disposed of by not lets than two judges of that high court.provided further that any appeal which has not been preferred before the date on which the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) act, 1972, ..... an appeal will lie under section 23(1) of the act to the principal civil court of original jurisdiction within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the coking coal mine or coke oven plant is situated, can it be said that such appellate court is not a court subordinate to the high court in my view, that cannot be .....

State of Tamil Nadu and ors. Vs. L. Abu Kavur Bai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC326; 1983(2)SCALE541; (1984)1SCC515; [1984]1SCR725; 1984(16)LC1(SC)

..... up for consideration in a recent constitution bench decision of this court in sanjeev coke manufacturing co's case (supra) where one of us (reddy, j.) made the following observations :'the next question for consideration is whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a law directing the policy of the state towards securing 'that ..... the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good. coal is, of course, one of the most important ..... operation of article 39(b) & (c). on this aspect of the matter, iyer,j. in the karnataka case further observed thus :the next question is whether nationalisation can have nexus with distribution.... to 'distribute', even in its simple dictionary 'meaning, is to, allot, to divide into classes or into groups' and 'distribution .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... all the private and public sources of meeting material needs, not merely public possessions.'in sanjeev coke manufacturing co.'s case4 (supra) the 'material resources' were explained as:-'the next question for consideration is whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a law directing the policy of the state towards securing 'that the ownership and ..... control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good, coal is, of course, one of the most important ..... stood prior to its amendment by the 42nd amendment, as a result of the decision in eshavananda bharathi's case2, stood revived. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat coking coal ltd. and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 , the judgment proceeded on the basis that article 31-c stood revived as it existed as .....

Assam Sillimanite Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC938; JT1992(2)SC434; 1991(2)SCALE1309; 1992Supp(1)SCC692; [1991]Supp3SCR273; 1992(1)LC288(SC)

..... the common good of the people and would be clearly covered by clause (b) of article 39.34. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company (supra), the constitutional validity of coking coals mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 was under challenge. the court said that when article 39(b) refers ..... capable of producing wealth for the community would be material resources. the conservation of the essential ingredients necessary for the crucial iron and steel industry by nationalisation is only in implementation of the policy declared in clause (b) of article 39.36. in the recent decision of this court in tinsukhia electric ..... interpreted in the earlier decisions of this court32. in state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy (supra), the karnataka contract carriages acquisition act, 1976 for nationalisation of contract carriages in the state was challenged on the ground that there is no real and substantial nexus between the purpose of the acquisition and .....