Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 5 acquisition of rights of owners of coke oven plants Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1 results (0.118 seconds)

Dec 06 1996 (HC)

Manipal Housing Finance Syndicate Ltd. and Others Vs. Manipal Stock an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]98CompCas432(Mad)

..... on the part of the defendants and there could be no passing off particularly when there was no damage of any significance over the whole period since nationalisation. it was also held that there was no evidence of confusion except in one case of press report. the court found that the plaintiffs had failed ..... u.k. in that case, the defendant-bank had been incorporated in switzerland on the instigation of the plaintiff-bank as an independent company. after the nationalisation of the pakistani banks the plaintiff tried to obtain the effective management of the defendants and being unsuccessful the plaintiff sought relief on the grounds that the defendants ..... described in the plaint at para. 8 as one of the notable institutions started by the pai family. that bank was founded in the year 1925. after nationalisation of the said bank, compensation allotted by the government of india of rs. 1.65 crores was utilised to start the industrial credit and development syndicate limited in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1996 (HC)

Ashok Leyland Employees Union and Another Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC660

..... consider that a case is made out warranting interference with the impugned order passed by the central administrative tribunal.' in : [1983]1scr1000 (sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. m/s. bharat coking coal ltd.) in dealing with a challenge made to coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, it was held as hereunder :- '26. shri ashok sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat ..... coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalistion) act. but, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2005 (HC)

G.V. Films Ltd. Vs. S. Priyadarshan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]287ITR561(Mad)

..... arose before the supreme court in the decision 1 reported in subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 . in the said case, directors of a private coal mining company executing sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on march 20, 1972, and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, coming into force on may 1, 1973. pointing out that the purchasers of ..... the case of husband and wife, learned senior counsel for the auction purchasers has relied upon the decisions reported in parvinder singh v. renu gautam : air2004sc2299 , subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 , madras bangalore transport co. (west) v. inder singh : air1986sc1564 , cit v. sri meenakshi mills ltd. : [1967]63itr609(sc) , juggilal kamlapat v. cit : [1969]73itr702(sc) .112. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2012 (HC)

M.Azeez and ors. Vs. Indian Bank, Rep by Chairman and Managing Directo ...

Court : Chennai

..... cases relied on by the petitioners were all relatable to forfeiture or deprivation of gratuity. the case on hand is different.15. the judgment in bharat coking coal ltd.'s case (cited supra) arose out of the scheme framed where the pension scheme was framed including the components of gratuity will exclude the provisions ..... to provide for the regulation and control of the business of the corporation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. its primary purpose was to nationalise private insurance business and to establish the life insurance corporation of india. inevitably, the enactment spelt out the functions of the corporation, provided for the ..... course of his employment.13. protection of gratuity.-no gratuity payable under this act [and no gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop exempted under section 5] shall be liable to attachment in execution of any decree or order of any civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2012 (HC)

Velu at Velusamy Vs. the State Rep.by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

..... cases relied on by the petitioners were all relatable to forfeiture or deprivation of gratuity. the case on hand is different.15. the judgment in bharat coking coal ltd.'s case (cited supra) arose out of the scheme framed where the pension scheme was framed including the components of gratuity will exclude the provisions ..... to provide for the regulation and control of the business of the corporation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. its primary purpose was to nationalise private insurance business and to establish the life insurance corporation of india. inevitably, the enactment spelt out the functions of the corporation, provided for the ..... course of his employment.13. protection of gratuity.-no gratuity payable under this act [and no gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop exempted under section 5] shall be liable to attachment in execution of any decree or order of any civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2015 (HC)

1.P.K.M.Selvam Vs. 1.State Through

Court : Chennai

..... proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by parliament such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and right in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //