Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 31 offences by companies Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 1,364 results (0.163 seconds)

Tara Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1682; (1980)4SCC179; [1980]3SCR1042

..... they are two distinct minerals.in support of these submissions shri seervai relies very strongly on the definition of 'coal mine' in section 2(b) of the coal mines (nationalisation act, 26 of 1973, and the definition, by contrast, of 'coking coal mine' in section 3(c) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 36 of 1972.54. these submissions are met by the learned attorney general with the answer that if ..... point the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1973 cover the whole field of 'coal' which was intended to be nationalised. the titles of the two acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines : mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively; mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal; and mines containing seams of other coal. though .....

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , which came to be continued under the essential commodities act. the coal controller controlled the quality and quantity as noticed in ashoka smokeless coal india (p) 31 ltd. and others22. considering its vital importance, it became the only mineral which was nationalized in terms of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 and the coal mines nationalisation act 1973. the colliery control order 1945 was repealed and replaced ..... by the colliery collar control order 2000 w.e.f. 01.01.2000.32. the preamble to the nationalisation act reads as follows: an act to provide for the acquisition and transfer .....

M/s Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Pal Bhatia .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... respondents.3. the parliament enacted the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act ) providing for the acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule. the schedule to the nationalisation act contained a list of about 711 coal mines located in different parts of the country ..... reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.5377 of2015m/s bharat coking coal ltd. ...appellant(s) versus mahendra pal bhatia and ors. ...respondent(s) judgment v. ramasubramanian 1. what was contemplated to be a summary proceeding ..... of this court (also of a 3 member bench) in bharat coking coal ltd. vs. madanlal agrawal2, steers clear any air of suspicion. in this case, this court clarified that the extended meaning given to the word mine was to ensure that the activity of mining coal could be carried on in an uninterrupted fashion. this court also .....

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the argument that there is no specific provision in the act as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 does not carry the matter any further because the idea embedded in those provisions are implicit in the provisions of this enactment, as ..... itself. the question, therefore, is whether absence of specific provision as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 that the shareholding shall always be held by the government, will give a different complexion to these provisions. when the provisions of the act ..... the petition in the present case - that the residual disinvestment can occur only after the amendment of the nationalisation act 1976- is substantially similar to the first and second reliefs sought by maton mines mazdoor sangh, when they challenged the disinvestment of 2002 and 2014, on the basis of the decision in .....

Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good; xxx xxx xxx an interesting discussion is contained in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs bharat coking coal ltd. & anr (1983) 1 scr1000at pages 1023 to 1025, on the scope of the expression material resources of the community and the expression ..... of the compulsory acquisition of the undertaking, the licensee was given a solatium of 10% of such book value. importantly, this court, after holding that nationalisation would come within the expression distribution for the purposes of article 39(b), engrafted another test when legislation claims the protection of article 31-c. the court ..... 735. also, in maharashtra state electricity board vs thana electric supply co. (1989) 3 scc616 at para 43, this court said: 43. the idea of nationalisation of a material resource of the community cannot be divorced from the idea of distribution of that resource in the community in a manner which advances common good. .....

Medical Council of India Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the amendment act, sub-section (2) was introduced in section 10 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. the said provision declared that the amounts specified in the fifth column of the first schedule against any coking coal mines or group of coking coal mine specified in the second column of the said schedule are required to be given ..... the custodian being appointed by the central government took over the management of coking coal mines and the said mines remained under the management of the central government through the custodian during the period from 17.10.1971 to 30.04.1972. the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 came into force w.e.f. 1.5.1972, ..... and the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to coking coal mines stood transferred to and vested absolutely in the central government free from all encumbrances .....

Balaraj Jadhav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... that effect in the act itself. the question, therefore, is whether absence of specific provision as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 that the shareholding shall always be held by the government, will give a different complexion to these provisions. when the provisions of the act provide for vesting of ..... to subserve the common good. the argument that there is no specific provision in the act as contained the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 does not carry the matter any further because the idea embedded in those provisions are this enactment, as explained earlier. if disinvestment takes place and the company ceases .....

Kamla Shankar Dubey Vs. M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Court : Jharkhand

..... place in the history of litigation between m/s sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company and m/s bccl. while several other coking coal mines and coke oven plants were taken over by virtue of the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalization) act 1972, m/s sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company strongly resisted the process of taking over and vesting ..... decided by the constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme court vide judgement dated 10.12.1982 reported in 1983 (1) scc147[sanjeev coke manufacturing company versus m/s bharat coking coal limited and another] 5. as a matter of fact, even after the judgment rendered by the apex court on 10.12.1982 ..... l.p.a. no. 76 of 2009 --- kamla shankar dubey --- ---- appellant versus 1. m/s bharat coking coal limited through the general manager, dhanbad 2. the general manager, m/s bharat coking coal limited, dhanbad 3. sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company, dhanbad --- respondents --- coram:the hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh the hon'ble mr. .....

Sadhvendra Singh Alias Sadho Singh Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the custodian did not take possession of schedule 'a' & 'b' lands as they are not belonging to any coal mine. their possession was never questioned, disputed or obstructed. thereafter on enactment of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972, dobari colliery was listed at serial no. 152 and compensation has been awarded to the ..... owners by the central government. under the said act, management of all other coal mines were taken over by the central government. it ..... . p. (c) no. 4727 of 2010 sadhvendra singh @ sadho singh ..... petitioner vs. 1. bharat coking coal ltd. district dhanbad 2. the project officer, rocp/south jharia kustore area no. iii, kustore area, bharat coking coal ltd., district dhanbad 3. estate officer, koyala bhawan, koyala nagar, district dhanbad ...principal defendants/respondents 4. .....

Dr. M Basappa Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament, such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 ..... and 7 of the act providing for acquisition of the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable." the hon'ble apex ..... movement of iron ore and manganese ore; further, the petitioner has deliberately committed omissions and commissions while working as a director, in contravention of the mines and mineral development regulation act, 1957 (for short, 'mmdr act'); he issued 41 permits through his subordinate territorial officers during the year 2004 .....