Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1986Raj40; 1985(1)WLN484
..... company cannot be regarded as a mining company in as much as apart from coking coal mines and the coal mines which were nationalised under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the company has other assets also.10. the expression 'mining company' has been defined in section 3(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to mean a company owning a coking coal mine. the aforesaid definition implies that ..... a company would be a mining company under the aforesaid .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)
..... , vol. viii, the word 'occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , and it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1990]69CompCas248(Raj)
..... minerals and properties ltd., in liquidation, were working on coal mines and marble mines. however, the coal mines were nationalised by the government of india under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, 1971, replaced by the coking coal mines. (emergency provisions) act, 1971, and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, as well as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it was also contended that the company had three mining leas'es at village bar, district pali, narvar, district .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1988(2)WLN305
..... honest.the construction we have made of section 14(1) of the 1974 act is reinforced by this decision.10. the significant difference between section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and section 5 of the 1974 act is the presence of sub-section (2)in section 5 of the. 1974 act and exclusion from ..... to be liable. this conclusion was reached on construction of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 and sub-section (1) of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. there is no dispute that sub-section (1) of section 17 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 of that act ..... plain language of these provisions.9. the supreme court decision in bharat coking coal ltd. (supra) related to a dismissed workman of colliery which was nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the bharat coking coal ltd. by virtue of the provisions contained in the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. this change occurred during the pendency of an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1961Raj98
..... and the regional transport authority was directed to reconsider their applications after giving them an opportunity of hearing in connection with the scheme relating to the nationalisation of the traas-port services by the state.thereafter the non-petitioners presented fresh applications for temporary permits. before considering these applications, the non-petitioners were ..... rejected which will introduce uncertainty, friction or confusion into the working, of the system.'then at page 19, he has summarized certain criterions suggested by lord coke for finding out the intention of the legislature. he writes that'to arrive at the real meaning, it is always necessary to get an exact conception ..... for the grant of a new permit under section 46 or section 54 during the pendency of the application.'(the underlining (here into ' '--ed.) is mine).with very great respect, i find it impossible for me to accept this substitution as a sound proposition. in the first place, speaking broadly, i can .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1972CriLJ1387; 1972()WLN231
1. A dispute between Meos on the one hand, and Faquirs and Meenas on the other of Village Bhatpura regarding allotment of land by the Government to the Meos in the town of Chhamra had its sequel in the death by gun shot of one Jumma on 21-6-1969 at about 7 p. m. in front of the house of P. W. 8 Umed. situated in the village Bhatpura. The immediate cause of the trouble was that on that day the accused Fazar ' and the Meos, deceased Jumma and P. W. 2 Bhulla. and P. W. 6 Nasru had gone to the village well for taking bath and there Bhulla's foot is said to have fallen on the soap owned by Fazar. This led to exchange of abuses between Fazar and the Meos. However, nothing untoward happened there at the well, but when the Meos while returning from the well came in front of the house of Umed, Fazar is alleged to have given a call to his friends, the accused Kishan Meena and Bhundal to come armed with guns and finish one of the Meos. The prosecution case is that in response to the call given by...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj139
..... . i may take up here the first case of g. nageswara rao, (air 1959 sc 308) (supra) around which much argument has been advanced. in that case, a scheme for nationalisation of motor transport was published by the state transport undertaking and the state government invited objections to the scheme. the petitioners filed their objections, the secretary to the transport department .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1982WLN321
..... points.34. viewed from this angle, i am convinced that i would be on firm foundation keeping in view the scheme of the act, history of nationalisation and legislative history referred to above, in taking the above view that the impugned notifications cannot be issued under section 11(2) and 49 of the act ..... read as under:the corporation, to begin with, had to take over the staff of the private insurers lest they should be thrown out of employment, on nationalisation. these private companies had no homogenous policy regarding conditions of service for their personnel, but when these heterogenous crowds under the same management (the corporation) divergent emoluments ..... was established under the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (here in after referred to as 'the act') with effect from 1st september, 1956; due to historical nationalisation wave.9. the life insurance corporation (here in after l i c ) introduced a self-contained code of work-norms in 1976 with in-built incentives and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj297; 1982()WLN294
..... this enlightened age of equality, if godcharles case is followed, the logical termination would have been that if an employer can sell his iron or coal at any price on account of equality clause and purchase labourers by exploiting poverty then not only bonded labour would be permissible, but the flesh trade would also be constitutional ..... us 304 (sic) on the ground that a citizen of u.s. may sell his labour for what he thinks best, just as an employer can sell his iron or coal. the u.s. supreme court itself has become wiser after that and never followed it. i refuse to even look into it in this enlightened age of 1982.96. in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj
..... one of the important factors to be considered in determining whether or not the reinstatement should be with full back wages and with continuity of employment. the above observations of mine would not prejudice the case of the petitioners in claiming back wages under section 31-c of the i.d. act by proper application. similarly they would not prejudice the .....
Tag this Judgment!