Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1986Raj40; 1985(1)WLN484
..... company cannot be regarded as a mining company in as much as apart from coking coal mines and the coal mines which were nationalised under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the company has other assets also.10. the expression 'mining company' has been defined in section 3(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to mean a company owning a coking coal mine. the aforesaid definition implies that ..... a company would be a mining company under the aforesaid .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1990]69CompCas248(Raj)
..... minerals and properties ltd., in liquidation, were working on coal mines and marble mines. however, the coal mines were nationalised by the government of india under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, 1971, replaced by the coking coal mines. (emergency provisions) act, 1971, and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, as well as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it was also contended that the company had three mining leas'es at village bar, district pali, narvar, district .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1988(2)WLN305
..... honest.the construction we have made of section 14(1) of the 1974 act is reinforced by this decision.10. the significant difference between section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and section 5 of the 1974 act is the presence of sub-section (2)in section 5 of the. 1974 act and exclusion from ..... to be liable. this conclusion was reached on construction of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 and sub-section (1) of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. there is no dispute that sub-section (1) of section 17 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 of that act ..... plain language of these provisions.9. the supreme court decision in bharat coking coal ltd. (supra) related to a dismissed workman of colliery which was nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the bharat coking coal ltd. by virtue of the provisions contained in the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. this change occurred during the pendency of an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)
..... , vol. viii, the word 'occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , and it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1998CriLJ2439
ORDERM.A.A. Khan, J.1. As common questions of law of considerable significance are involved in both these petitions under Section 482, Cr.P.C. these are disposed of by this common order.2. In S.B. Cr. Misc. Petn. No. 215 of 1997 Mukesh petitioner is alleged to have been found on 26-3-1989 keeping in his possession in a godown at 22, Godowns Factory Area, Jaipur 15 drums containing different kinds of petroleum products like mobile oil, greese liquid and black-hard and solid black oil, soap wash etc. with certain instruments and utensils to be used in preparing adulterated petroleum products. He was possessing no license to deal in petroleum products. He was, therefore, accused of having contravened clauses 3 and 4 of Lubricating Oil and Greese Order 1987 punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 (The Act). A police report under Section 170/173, Cr. P.C. was made against him to the Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) Cases on 1 -3-1993 and on the same day the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj62
..... and conditions of service notwithstanding that such further rationalisation or revision is unrelated to, or unconnected with, the amalgamation of insurance companies or merger consequent on nationalisation of general insurance business.(3) the central government may, by notification, add to, amend or vary any scheme framed under this section.(4) the power ..... and the said amendment scheme of 2005 has been framed by the central government in exercise of powers conferred by section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. it shall, therefore, be worthwhile to notice the relevant provisions of act of 1972 and the said schemes; and the relevant parts ..... has been alleged and so far statutory provisions are concerned, according to the learned counsel for the respondents, only section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 ['the act of 1972'] and the amendment scheme of 2005 issued thereunder are of statutory character and rest all has been left by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj139
..... . i may take up here the first case of g. nageswara rao, (air 1959 sc 308) (supra) around which much argument has been advanced. in that case, a scheme for nationalisation of motor transport was published by the state transport undertaking and the state government invited objections to the scheme. the petitioners filed their objections, the secretary to the transport department .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500
..... as between the workmen and the corporation the id act is a special legislation and the lic act is a general legislation. likewise, when compensation on nationalisation is the question, the lic act is the special statute. an application of the generalia maxim as expounded by english text books and decisions leaves us ..... the high court. the supreme court examined the scheme of the life insurance corporation act and the industrial disputes act and observed that, so far as the nationalisation of insurance business is concerned, the lic act is a special legislation, but equally indubitably is the inference, from a bare perusal of the subject, ..... act does not speak at all with specific, reference to workmen. on the other hand, its powers relate to the general aspects of nationalisation of management when private businesses are nationalised and a plurality of problems which, incidentally, involve transfer of service of existing employees of insurers. the workmen qua workmen and industrial disuputes .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj
..... one of the important factors to be considered in determining whether or not the reinstatement should be with full back wages and with continuity of employment. the above observations of mine would not prejudice the case of the petitioners in claiming back wages under section 31-c of the i.d. act by proper application. similarly they would not prejudice the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2001(4)WLC345; 2001(1)WLN191
Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, an educational trust claiming for the following reliefs:I. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 1.8.2000 (Annex. * 16) and 3.8.2000 (Annex. 17) be declared illegal and be quashed with all consequential benefits to the petitioner.II. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, it may be declared that the Jain community falls in the religious minority in the State of Rajasthan and is entitled to exercise its right conferred by Article 30 of the Constitution of India.III. by an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents may be directed to permit the petitioner to grant admission to BDS Course from Academic Session 2000-1 against 50% management quota in exercise of its rights as an institution run by religious minority and the respondents may be restrained from interfering with the exercise of rights of the petitioner in the matter of admission so far as ...
Tag this Judgment!