Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 18 provident fund Page 6 of about 4,806 results (0.543 seconds)

Jun 05 2002 (HC)

The National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited, Bombay Vs. Gopal B. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR470; (2002)4BOMLR473; [2002(95)FLR751]; (2002)IIILLJ787Bom; 2002(2)MhLj850

..... act, 1972 is pari materiasimilar to section 13 of the nationalisation act. theapex ..... coking coal ltd. and ors., 1978 (2) llj 17.in the case before the apex court, the correctinterpretation of section 9 of the coking coal minesnationalisation act, 1972 read along with section 17was laid down. section 9 of the coking coal minesnationalisation act, 1972 is similar to section 5 ofthe nationalisation act. section 17 of the cokingcoal mines nationalisation ..... day for the contravention of any provisionof law would be enforceable against the governmentcompany.6. section 13(1) of the nationalisation actrelates to continuance of the services of theemployees with the government company afternationalisation. section 13 reads as follows :-'continuance of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1976 (HC)

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. Kalachand Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ27Cal

..... that the writ of mandamus issued by the learned judge in the trial court declaring the respondent-petitioner kalachand mitra to be entitled to the benefits of section 17 of coking coal mines (nationalisation act) 1972 must be upheld. it is not in dispute that the said respondent would be entitled to such benefits if it be found that immediately before the appointed day ..... , 1971 and the 'appointed day' as mentioned hereinbefore remained the same. thereafter, on or about january 12, 1972, bharat coking coal ltd., the appellants herein, a government company, were appointed as the custodian of the said colliery. then came the parliamentary legislation of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 on august 17, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 1972 act), making provisions for the acquisition and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1984 (SC)

Ajoy Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC127; [1984(48)FLR448]; 1984LabIC691; (1984)ILLJ368SC; 1984(1)SCALE539; (1984)3SCC127; [1984]3SCR252; 1984(16)LC500(SC)

..... between employees similarly situated, particularly in the matter of dearness allowance and retirement age.20. the petitioners contend that under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974, the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 etc., sepearate companies had been formed on nationalisation. the employees of those companies were entitled to have their service conditions regulated under industrial disputes act, 1947. in the present case, the employees ..... it been necessary for us to do so but in the view that has been taken, it is not necessary.51. another item mentioned before us was the employees of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. it has to be borne in mind that the object covered by the scheme of the act was entirely different from the general insurance business .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2001 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. and ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC724; JT2001(1)SC536; 2001(1)SCALE157; (2001)4SCC139; [2001]1SCR221; 2001(1)LC496(SC)

..... presumed not to have intended an excess of jurisdiction. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs . m/s. bharat coking coal limited : [1983]1scr1000, the constitution bench speaking through chinnappa reddy, j., had observed, in the context of interpretation of the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 that the court is not concerned with the statements ..... itself said. in the facts of that case the court had held that 'we do not entertain the slightest doubt that the nationalisation of the coking coal mines and the specified coke oven plants for the above purpose was towards securing that 'the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so ..... an act to establish in the economic interest of india greater public control over the coal mining industry and its development by providing for the acquisition by the state of unworked land containing or likely to contain coal deposits or of right in or over such land, for the extinguishment or modification of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1980 (SC)

Tara Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1682; (1980)4SCC179; [1980]3SCR1042

..... they are two distinct minerals.in support of these submissions shri seervai relies very strongly on the definition of 'coal mine' in section 2(b) of the coal mines (nationalisation act, 26 of 1973, and the definition, by contrast, of 'coking coal mine' in section 3(c) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 36 of 1972.54. these submissions are met by the learned attorney general with the answer that if ..... point the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1973 cover the whole field of 'coal' which was intended to be nationalised. the titles of the two acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines : mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively; mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal; and mines containing seams of other coal. though .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1992 (HC)

Bharat Coking Coal Limited. Vs. Jharia Talkies and Cold Storage Privat ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT357(HC),97CWN122

..... the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, later replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, later replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provision) act, 1971, the central government took over the management of all coking coal mines/coke oven plants. the appellant herein, which was constituted on 1st january, 1972, was appointed by the central government, as custodian of coking coal mines/coke oven plants. subsequently, by virtue of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, all coking coal mines/coke oven .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... ownership of the resources must vest in the community i.e. the state. a legislation such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act may be a legislation for the acquisition by the state of coking coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to private parties but it is not a legislation towards securing that the ownership and ..... it means and includes all resources, natural and man-made, public and private-owned.22. in view of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 is a legislation for giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principle specified in article 39(b) of the ..... shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1988 (HC)

Sree Jagadamba Coke Mfg. Enterprises and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1989Cal337

..... be set out hereunder :(a) damagoria colliery was not even regarded by the authorities as containing coking coal and it was in fact not nationalised under the coking coal mines (nationalisation act, 1972). it was nationalised under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 which provided for nationalisation of non-coking coal mines.(b) premium fuels is the first coke oven plant in west bengal being established in 1974 at a distance of about 2 k.m ..... supplies from about 50 collieries situated in the state of bihar. most of these coke oven plants in bihar were established immediately after the nationalisation of the coal mines and during the period of 1973-74.(e) the coke oven plants in the state of bihar were never dependent upon the supply of coal from collieries in other states, particularly in west bengal and drawing of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1990 (HC)

The National Textile Corporation (South Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Shramik ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR160; (1990)92BOMLR492; (1993)IIILLJ277Bom

..... act before us is very different from the scheme of the act before the supreme court. and observations of the supreme court regarding section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act cannot be blindly applied to section 3(7) of the present act. 12. now, is there anything in the scheme of the act before ..... company. 10. we do not see how this decision helps in the interpretation of section 3(7) of the present act. section 9(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 provides generally for the enforcement of liabilities incurred prior to the appointed day against the owner and not against the central government or the government ..... have relied upon a decision of the supreme court in the case of the workmen v. the bharat coking coal ltd. reported in : (1978)iillj17sc . the case before the supreme court involved the interpretation of section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. under section 9 of that act it was provided as under: 9. central government not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //