Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 18 provident fund Page 37 of about 4,806 results (0.313 seconds)

M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the employees' state insurance corporation established under section 3 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (34 of 1948), or the board of trustees constituted under section 3a of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 (46 of 1948), or the central board of trustees and the state boards of trustees constituted under section 5a and section 5b, respectively ..... national housing bank established under section 3 of the national housing bank act, 1987 (53 of 1987)], or [an air transport service, or a banking or an insurance company,] a mine, an oil field,] [a cantonment board,] or a [major port, any company in which not less than fifty-one per cent. of the paid-up share capital is held by .....

The State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC1300; [1974(29)FLR97]; 1974LabIC841; (1974)4SCC656; [1974]3SCR760

..... . consequently, lacking the capacity to inform itself fully about the peculiarities of a particular local situation, a court should hesitate to dub the legislative classification irrational (see carmichnel v. southern coal and coke co. 301 u.s. 495. tax laws, for example, may respond closely to local needs and court's familiarity with these needs is likely to be limited.74. mr .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... several decisions of this court including the decisions in p. vajravelu mudaliar v. special deputy collector, madras & anr. (1965) 1 scr 614; rustom cavasjee cooper (banks nationalisation) v. union of india (1970) 1 scc 248; deputy commissioner and collector, kamrup & ors. v. durga nath sharma (1968) 1 scr 561 and reliance energy ..... property' in article 300a includes mines, minerals and quarries and deprivation thereof having been made by authority of law was held to be valid and not violative of article 300a. 108. article ..... 596, this court examined whether section 69-a, introduced by the gujarat amendment act 8 of 1982 in the bombay land revenue code which dealt with vesting mines, minerals and quarries in lands held by persons including girasdars and barkhalidars in the state violated article 300a of the constitution. the court held that the ` .....

Commercial Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1993]201ITR348(Bom)

..... government the prize money either in cash or by demand draft or letter of credit encashable on the date of concerned draw on the state bank of india or any nationalised bank having its branch at panjim, in respect of each draw covering prize over and above rs. 5,000 at least 30 days before each draw. it is expressly agreed ..... decision in state of bombay (now maharashtra) v. ratilal vadilal and bros. : [1961]2scr367 , ratilal vadilal were commission agents and coal was supplied to karsandas through them. under the provisions of the colliery control order, no person could acquire or purchase coal from a colliery except under an authorisation from the central government. a question arose as to when the colliery supplied .....

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Higher Secondary School Staff Associa ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD125; 2001(3)ALT164

..... be handed over to the teachers.14. in support of the aforementioned contentions strong reliance has been placed on the decisions of the apex court in subhra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal limited, : air2000sc1203 , workmen, ari limited bhavnager v. ari limited bhavnagar, : (1986)illj142sc , shri anadi mukta sadguru shree juktajeevandasjiswami suvarna jayanti mohatsav smarak trust and others v. vr rudani, : (1989)iillj324sc .....

J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487

..... municipal limits, if they are sold within the limits of municipal council although such goods were meant for use and consumption of the consumers outside the municipal limits. (underline is mine). the recital in the judgment of the division bench in para 3 of its judgment reported in 1980 wln 107 : (air 1981 ncc 25) with regard to the stand taken ..... by the plaintiff alone.38a. in elgin mills co. ltd. v. nagar mahapalika, kanpur. air 1976 all 274 raw materials like steam, coal, dyes and chemical cotton yarn were used for manufacturing cotton textiles. it was held that steam coal was burnt away in the process of producing steam for supplying energy for movement of the machinery and was thus consumed. likewise .....

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

..... and promote scientific outlook. facilities of providing insecticides, pesticides, better seeds, manures are matters of strategy planned by the state to increase the agricultural yield by appropriate economic inputs. the nationalisation of banks and availability of agricultural loans in rural sectors on better scales further is a boost to agrarian economy. thus all these steps appear to have set the stage ..... holding we may state that right to property on the strength of article 31 and article 19(1)(f) was the subject-matter of different pronouncements leading upto the bank nationalisation case, r. c. cooper v. union of india : [1970]3scr530 which had eventually led the parliament to enact the constitution (twenty-fifth amendment) act, 1971.48. in this judgment for .....

Jyothi Home Industries Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3831; [1987]64STC208(Kar)

..... . petitioner in w.p. 19818 of 1984 owns a textile mill and causes entry, amongst others, of industrial machineries; industrial goods and products; industrial packaging materials; iron and steel; coke and coal, for use of consumption. 4. the impost is a tax on entry of goods into the 'local area' for consumption, use or sale therein. the essential character of this impost .....

Sri S. Santhanam, I.A.S. and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT666

..... of list i with reference to regulation & development under the control of the union), whereas the central act was enacted under entry 54 of list i (regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the ..... 1984, which provided for the very same matters as are provided by 1957 act. and that the very question has been decided by the supreme court earlier in hinger rampur coal co. ltd. v. state of orissa, : [1961]2scr537 . in the said earlier case, it was found that the orissa act was void, because the entire range of ..... mineral development was taken under central control by the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1948 which act also contains a declaration in terms of entry 36 of the federal list in the government of india act, 1935. .....

Gupta Trading Co. and Others Vs. Delhi Administration and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1986]62STC7(Delhi)

..... the word 'coal mine'. in the case, state of bombay v. r. m. d. chamarbaugwala : [1957]1scr874 , the word 'or' was similarly read as 'and' in section 2(1)(d) of the bombay lotteries ..... out. at the same time in the case, state of bihar v. s. k. roy : 1966crilj1538 , the supreme court read the word 'or' occurring in section 2(b) of the coal mines provident fund and bonus schemes act, 1948, as 'and', as it found that any other interpretation would lead to anomalous and starling consequence. this had reference to the definition of .....