Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR718; 2001(4)BomCR103; [2001(89)FLR1015]; (2001)IILLJ273Bom
..... an 'employee' as given under the payment of gratuity act, 1972 which reads as under:'employee' means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, to do any skilled, semiskilled or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work, whether the terms of such employment are express or implied .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1978Delhi199
ORDER1. The election petition under S. 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 calls in question the election of Shri Ved Prakash to the Metropolitan Council for Delhi from Constituency No. 33, Rohtas Nagar and is based on two broad facts. The first is the improper rejection of the nomination papers of Shri Devinder Kumar and the second is the illegal inclusion and exclusion of certain areas from constituency No. 33 after the publication of order No. 40 dated April 28, 1975 issued under S. 10(1) read with S. 2 of the Delimitation Act, 1972.2. The total number of seats in the Metropolitan Council for Delhi as provided in S. 3 of the Delhi Administration Act, 1966 to be filled by persons chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies is 56. By virtue of S. 9 of the said Act, the provisions contained in Parts Iii to Xi of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and of any rules and orders made there under, for the time being in f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1996AP238
1. The defendant is the appellant. He suffered the judgment and decree at the hands of the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.S. No. 827 of 1980 dated 31-8-1982. The suit has been decreed for possession of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff along with the relief of maintenanceamount at the rate of Rs. 400/- per mensem with costs.2. The plaintiff is the respondent. The parties would be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant. The suit property is described as a house in the plaint. The respondent has resisted the appeal.3. The plaintiff and the defendant are the legally wedded wife, and husband. They married on 11-5-1966. They lived together a few months and did not pull on well together for certain reasons and the defendant took the plaintiff to her parents' house at Peddavuta-palli in Krishna District for Sankranti festival in the year 1968, visited her once in the year 1968 and thereafter, did not take her back. Since then they are not livi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2008)2GLR1163
..... by notification and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt any employee or class of employees employed in any establishment, factory mine oilfield plantation port railway company or shop to which this act applies from the operation of the provisions of this act, if in the opinion of the ..... appropriate government, the employees in such establishment factory mine oil field, plantation, port, railway company or shop are in receipt of gratuity or pensionary benefits not less favourable then the benefits conferred under this act ..... power to exempt: (1) the appropriate government may, by notification, and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop to which this act applies from the operation of the provisions of this act if, in the opinion of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1983)34CTR(Guj)230; (1983)1GLR623; [1983]142ITR211(Guj)
Ahmadi, J. 1. Where any immovable property is subjected to acquisition under the provisions of Chap. XXA-of the I.T. Act. 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), can the tenants who are in occupation of different parts of the said property be evicted therefrom under s. 269I of the Act with a view to vesting it absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances, is the question which we are required to consider in these three petitions brought by the tenants of the acquired property. The facts giving rise to these petitions, briefly stated, are as under : The property which is the subject-matte of acquisition is a three-storeyed building known as 'Shamalaji Kripa' standing on a parcel of land, bearing Tikka No. 8-3, Survey No. 3-7 of Revenue Survey No. 554/B, situate at Sayajiganj, Station road, Baroda. It consists of the ground floor and three storeys. The ground floor of the said property was let some time in November, 1966, to the Union Bank of India, Sayajiganj Branch, Bar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : [2002(95)FLR1164]; (2002)IIILLJ607Mad; (2002)3MLJ74
A. Kulasekaran, J.1. The Petitioner has filed the Writ Petition No. 18572 of 1994 seeking for a Writ of Certiotari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Gratuity appeal No.3/94 dated 19-08-1994 confirming the order of the first respondent dated 31-12-1993 in P.G. Application No.32/1992-D2 and quash the same.2. Writ Petition No. 18575 of 1994 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking for a Writ of Certiotari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Gratuity appeal No.4/94 dated 19-08-1994 confirming the order of the first respondent dated 31-12-1993 in P.G. Application No.33/1992-D2 and quash the same.3. In both the writ petitions, the petitioners and the respondents are one and the same. Hence, this common order is passed.4. The facts culled out from the affidavit in both the writ petitions are that the petitioners mill was originally a public Limited company and it was closed on 14-05-1968. Thereafter, the mill was taken over by Tamil Nadu Textile Corporation and the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
..... the regulations. at this stage it would be relevant to reproduce the press lease issued by the coke company on behalf of fcgl being its group company. gujarat nre coke acquires 2nd coking coal mine in australia gujarat nre coke limited (gncl) is pleased to announce that their australian joint venture company, gujarat nre fcgl pty ..... ltd., has entered into an agreement to acquire the coal mining leases comprising the whole of old avondale colliery and part ..... that the decision taken by fcgl in the board meeting on july 4, 2005 regarding the disposal of its investment in the coke company to raise funds for acquiring coal mines in australia was not price sensitive information within the meaning of the regulations. we are in agreement with the learned senior counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1971Delhi477; [1972]85ITR261(Delhi)
..... problem. (9) in morgan v. tate(1) the company was engaged in sugar refining and it incurred expenses in a propaganda campaign to oppose the threatened nationalisation of the industry. the commissioners for the general purposes of the income-tax found that 'the sum in question was money wholly and exclusively laid 'out for ..... was said that it was an expense to an association whose object was to keep a watchful eye on the proceedings, no doubt in the interest of mining of coal generally, but without that character of particular service which was prominent in the case of proceedings before a conciliation board. similarly with regard to the amounts ..... purposes they were not admissible. (22) it was urged by the learned counsel for the revenue before us that if subscriptions to the mining association of great britian and for experimenting with coal dust were not admissible much less can the subscriptions for contributions made by the assesses in the present case be to the vanaspati manufacturers .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2042; [2007(3)JCR292(Jhr)]
..... at the rate specified in second schedule in respect of the mineral. this section further provides that holder of the mining lease shall not be liable to pay any royalty in respect of any coal consumed by the workman engaged in colliery subject to the condition that such consumption by the workman does not exceed 1 ..... control of industry by the central government, it is not unconstitutional.25. in the case of hingir-rampur coal co. ltd and ors. v. the state of orissa and ors. : [1961]2scr537 , the validity of orissa mining area development fund act, 1952 act was challenged by the petitioner who was the lessee in respect of the ..... 06 assailed the impugned resolution as being illegal and wholly without jurisdiction so far the coal company is concerned. according to the learned counsel for the purpose of mining activities of the petitioner-central coalfields limited lands were acquired under the provisions of coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act 1957. under section 3 of the said .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1975SC17; (1974)2SCC777; [1975]2SCR138
..... 2. the question was whether by virtue of section 8 of the general clauses act, the definition of the word 'employer' in clause (e) of section 2 of the coal mines provident fund and bonus schemes act should be construed with reference to the definition of the word 'owner' in clause (1) of section 2 of act 35 of 1952, ..... , machinery, tramways and sidings, whether above or below ground, in or adjacent to a coal mine will come within the scope and ambit of the definition only when they belong to the coal-mine. in other words, the word 'or' occurring before the expression 'belonging to a coal mine' in the main definition has to be read to mean 'and'.this case, as well ..... fund and bonus schemes act, 1948, where that expression was defined to mean 'the owner of a coal mine as defined in clause (g) of section 3 of the indian mines act, 1923'. the indian mines act, 1923, had been repealed and substituted by the mines act, 1952 (act 35 of 1952). in the latter act the word 'owner' had been defined in .....
Tag this Judgment!