Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 18 provident fund Page 23 of about 4,806 results (1.348 seconds)

M/s Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Pal Bhatia .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... respondents.3. the parliament enacted the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act ) providing for the acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule. the schedule to the nationalisation act contained a list of about 711 coal mines located in different parts of the country ..... reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.5377 of2015m/s bharat coking coal ltd. ...appellant(s) versus mahendra pal bhatia and ors. ...respondent(s) judgment v. ramasubramanian 1. what was contemplated to be a summary proceeding ..... of this court (also of a 3 member bench) in bharat coking coal ltd. vs. madanlal agrawal2, steers clear any air of suspicion. in this case, this court clarified that the extended meaning given to the word mine was to ensure that the activity of mining coal could be carried on in an uninterrupted fashion. this court also .....

New Chhatabar Coal Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. J.G. Kumarmangalam and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1974Cal242

..... powers under article 123(1) of the constitution of india promulgated an ordinance known as the coal mines (taking over of management) ordinance, 1973 (referred to as 'the said ordinance' hereinafter) for the purpose of taking over the management of coal mines containing coal pending the nationalisation of the said mines. the said ordinance came into effect on january 31, 1973. in the schedule to the said ..... (2) of section 3' shall be substituted. (3) for the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that the schedule includes those coal mines in relation to which the declaration made by the coal board to the effect that they contain coking coal is in dispute.''5. (1) the central government may, as soon as it is convenient administratively so to do, appoint any person .....

Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner, (Central) a ...

Court : Kolkata

..... act, 1972.2. it appears that the respondent no. 2 sunil kumar bose was an employee of the bengal coal company limited and messrs. andrew yule and company limited was at one time the managing agent of bengal coal company limited. before the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, the conditions of service of the said sunil kumar bose used to be governed by certain rules ..... called andrew yule and co. ltd. clerical staff terms and conditions of service and standard office procedure. after the said nationalisation act, the said sunil kumar bose became an .....

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the argument that there is no specific provision in the act as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 does not carry the matter any further because the idea embedded in those provisions are implicit in the provisions of this enactment, as ..... itself. the question, therefore, is whether absence of specific provision as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 that the shareholding shall always be held by the government, will give a different complexion to these provisions. when the provisions of the act ..... the petition in the present case - that the residual disinvestment can occur only after the amendment of the nationalisation act 1976- is substantially similar to the first and second reliefs sought by maton mines mazdoor sangh, when they challenged the disinvestment of 2002 and 2014, on the basis of the decision in .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]110ITR46(Cal)

Deb, J.1. Common questions of law and facts are involved in these two references under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The question referred to this court in Income-tax Reference No. 156 of 1969 is as follows :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sums of Rs. 95,421, Rs. 1,00,564 and Rs. 1,17,969 disallowed by the Income-tax Officer out of the total contributions made by the assessee towards the provident fund were allowable under Section 36(l)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64 and 1964-65, respectively ?'2. The question called for by the court in Income-tax References Nos. 398, 399 and 400 of 1969 runs thus :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the provident fund maintained by the assessee satisfied the condition laid down in Rule 4(c) of the Fourth Schedule, Part 'A', of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?'3. The assessee is a private limited company. The company is a m...

Kashmir Motor Drivers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1983J& K100

..... the t. a. c. in revising the rates of premia is legislative or administrative, has still to be determined.10. general insurance business in india was nationalised by virtue of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. numerous insurance companies were merged and reduced to only four in number to be called the acquiring companies, which are respondents 4 to 7 herein .....

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. the Principle Secretary and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... captive end uses to be notified from time to time and to allow the private sector to set up coal washeries, it is considered necessary to amend the coal and coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. the coal mines (nationalization) amendment bill, 1992 seeks to achieve the aforesaid objectives. 37. section 3 of the cmn ..... , vide circular dated 12.12.2001, the central government, reviewing its earlier policy, allowed the state government companies or undertakings to do mining of coking and non-coking coal or lignite reserves either by opencast or underground method, anywhere in the country, subject to the conditions set out therein. under the revised ..... policy, the state government company/undertaking was permitted to mine non-coking coal and coking coal reserves or lignite by opencast/underground method without the restriction of isolated small pockets . having carefully examined the circular dated 12.12.2001 .....

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... was challenged. the provision was argued to be invalid because it allowed the municipalities to tax lands covered by coal mines, which were the subject of legislation by parliament under the mmdr act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act 1973355. chief justice y v chandrachud, speaking for the majority, rejected the contention on the ground that ..... minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957, has naturally to be the paramount consideration in all matters concerning the regulation of mines and the development of minerals.156. in bharat coking coal ltd. v. state of bihar,218 the issue before a two judge bench was whether the state government had legal authority ..... which any process ancillary to the getting dressing or preparation for the sale of minerals or of coke is being carried on. 190 offshore areas mineral (development and regulation) act 2002. section 4(k) defines mine to mean any place in the offshore area wherein any exploration or production operation is carried on, together .....

In Re: Ram Badan Choubey and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1960

..... calcutta in title suit no. 436 of 1979; that as receiver the petitioner moved an application under article 226 of the constitution challenging the validity of the coal: mines (nationalisation) amendment act 1976 on 29-2-1980 and obtained an interim order restraining the respondents from interfering with the work of the said colliery in any manner ..... commission of a crime. we make it perfectly plain that there will be no more authorisation for any receiver or other officer of court to extract coal or coking coal from any mine in india. section 3(3) of the 1976 act being all inclusive and having been constitutionally upheld by this court, it is no longer ..... paragraph 9).' these observations have been made in disposing of a batch of writ petitions claiming right to extract coking coal on the ground that the prohibition contained in the act of 1976 does not affect or operate on coking coal mines. reference has also been made to similar observations of the same learned judge in deja pada das v. .....

Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Others Vs. Union of India and Anot ...

Court : Delhi

..... of the constitution of india as also contrary to section 3(1)(a) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. dr singhvi further submitted that the supreme court was not concerned with how and in what manner the coal resources would be disposed of after the cancellation order. according to dr singhvi, there ..... being used by dri and cement industries and that this needed to be kept in view while earmarking the coal blocks. it was also noted that de-allocated coal mines / coal blocks having coking coal reserves could be considered for steel. another criteria used was that blocks having reserves of more than 100 million ..... regulated sector non regulated sector non regulated sector non regulated sector non regulated sector power power power power power power power power power steel (coking coal) steel (coking coal) non regulated sector non 40 iii9dongri tal-ii madhya pradesh singrauli 41 iii10kosar dongergaon maharastrawardha valley 42 iii11nerad malegaon maharastrawardha valley 43 iii12marki .....