Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 12 payment of further amount Page 12 of about 3,036 results (0.359 seconds)

Shio Nath Singh Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR481(Jhr)]

..... of the petitioner is only sham and a paper transaction. the land in question had already been vested with bccl with effect from 1.5.1972 after enactment of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. since there is a claim by the petitioner-appellant, in order to verify his right, title, ownership and possession of the land in question, he was asked ..... pointed out by the learned single judge, even according to the petitioner-appellant, the land in question, which belongs to him, has been acquired by the respondent-bccl for its mining purpose, whereas, according to the respondents, the petitioner is not the real owner, as he has not been able to establish his right, title, ownership and possession of the land .....

Mer Ramda Vejunandbhai and Etc. Vs. Hardasbhai Parbatbhai and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1992ACJ399; AIR1992Guj122; (1992)2GLR976

..... aforesaid decision of the supreme court thus fully supports my conclusion.24. it will not be out of place to mention that in section 20 of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973, section 23 of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972, in section 16(3) of plantation labour act, 198 1, section 10f of companies act, 1956, section 7(7) of payment of gratuity .....

Mer Ramdas Bejanand Bhai Vs. Harshad Bhai Mala Bhai

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1(1992)ACC717

..... aforesaid decision of the supreme court thus fully supports my conclusion.24. it will not be out of place to mention that in section 20 of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973, section 23 of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972, in section 16(3) of plantation labour act, 1981, section 10f of companies act, 1956, section 7(7) of payment of gratuity act .....

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and ors. Vs. N.A. Qureshi and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR315

..... who in actual use and physical possession and enjoyment of colliery is occupier within the said expression as used is section 3(a) of the cooking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 read with section 2(1) of the mines act, 1952. however, it is pertinent to note that it was so held by the supreme court because the petitioner therein were in possession of .....

Project Officer (Agent) Maheshpur Colliery of B.C.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR133(Jhr)]

..... in cwjc no. 3095 of 1999. the learned single judge referred to the decision of the supreme court in bharat coking coal limited v. madan lal agarwal, (1997)] scc 177 and the definition of mines under section 2(h) of the coal mines nationalisation act. he did not properly advert to the effect of the finding rendered by the appellate authority in paragraph 15 ..... question is a part of a mine or is a mine in terms of nationalisation act. on the basis of that ..... it is conceded that it is the surface of a mine, going by the decision of the supreme court in kali prasad v. bharat coking coal ltd. air 1989 sc 1530, the land in question comes within the definition of mine in sections 2(h)(iv) and 2(h)(vi)of the coal mines nationalisation act. thus, it is clear that the land in .....

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Shyam Sunder Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC560; JT1998(5)SC615; (1998)5SCC512

..... over of management) act, 1973 was followed by the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 and the extended definition of mine as indicated in the coal mines (taking over of management) act was retained in section 2(h) of the nationalisation act with modification. the definition of 'mine' has been noticed by this court in the decision of bharat coking coal ltd. v. madanlal agrawal, : air1997sc1599 and it has been held ..... on consideration of the definition of 'owner' and 'mine' in the said coal (nationalisation) act that even assets in respect of which the mine or the mining company may not be the proprietor but which were leased to the mine or which were in the possession of a .....

Coal Mines Authority Ltd., Calcutta and ors. Vs. Associated Cement Com ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986MP241; 1986MPLJ612

..... whenever a question arises as to whether a particular asset vested in the central government as a consequence of the application of the coal mines (nationalisation) act to that particular mine, what is to be seen is whether it answers the description given in any of the clauses. what is, therefore, to ..... .e., the plaintiff. the dispute, however, is as to what actually so vested. 'mine' and 'coal mine' have been assigned special significance under the coal mines (nationalisation) act. 'mine' is defined under section 2(h) which reads as follows :'(h) 'mine' means any excavation where any operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has ..... nationalisation act. likewise, clause (x) is also not attracted. in terms of that clause, only such lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owners of the mine which are in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on 'are mines .....

Shethia Mining and Manufacturing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax O ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]39STC246(Cal)

..... were very much different from the facts of the instant case before me. further, in the view i have taken of the effect of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, it is not necessary for me to rest my decision on the ratio of the aforesaid decision referred to hereinbefore. in an appropriate case, if ..... the same management;(x) all lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owners of the mine and in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of, the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture therefrom, of coke is carried on ;(xi) all lands and buildings [other than those referred to in sub-clause (x)] wherever ..... the same management;(x) all lands, buildings and equipments, belonging to the owner of the mine and in, adjacent to, or situated on, the surface of the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on ;(xi) all lands and buildings [other than those referred to in sub-clause (x)] .....

Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. and anr. Vs. J.G. Kumar ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(2)CHN226

..... kumar banerjee, j.1. appellant company being the successor-in-interest of thapar intrafor company of india ltd., filed the above writ petition inter alia challenging the vires of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1973') as well as for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents directing to hand over the plant and machinery mentioned ..... the same management;x) all lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owner of the mine, and in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of, the mine-where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on;xi) all lands and buildings [other than those referred to in sub-clause (x)] wherever situated, if solely used for .....

Eastern Coalfield Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... in relation to the management of barakar engineering and foundry works, dhanbad, to make the following contentions:a) there was a genuine industrial dispute.b) the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 did not prevent vesting of this dispute on the appellant.c) the tripartite settlement had been rightly interpreted by the industrial tribunal.d) the ..... has found that the tripartite settlement enjoined the previous owners to reinstate 600 odd workmen as stated above. further the tribunal held that section 7 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 did not prevent an industrial dispute which had arisen prior to the take over by the government, to be pursued against the new management ..... ors. : (2007) 5 scc 755.14. on the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent workmen has cited the decision of the workman v. the bharat coking coal limited and ors. : (1978) 2 scc 175 and the unreported decision of the division bench of our court presided over by the hon'ble justice satyabrata sinha, .....