Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1986Raj40; 1985(1)WLN484
..... company cannot be regarded as a mining company in as much as apart from coking coal mines and the coal mines which were nationalised under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the company has other assets also.10. the expression 'mining company' has been defined in section 3(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to mean a company owning a coking coal mine. the aforesaid definition implies that ..... a company would be a mining company under the aforesaid .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1990]69CompCas248(Raj)
..... minerals and properties ltd., in liquidation, were working on coal mines and marble mines. however, the coal mines were nationalised by the government of india under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, 1971, replaced by the coking coal mines. (emergency provisions) act, 1971, and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, as well as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it was also contended that the company had three mining leas'es at village bar, district pali, narvar, district .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1988(2)WLN305
..... honest.the construction we have made of section 14(1) of the 1974 act is reinforced by this decision.10. the significant difference between section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and section 5 of the 1974 act is the presence of sub-section (2)in section 5 of the. 1974 act and exclusion from ..... to be liable. this conclusion was reached on construction of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 and sub-section (1) of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. there is no dispute that sub-section (1) of section 17 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 of that act ..... plain language of these provisions.9. the supreme court decision in bharat coking coal ltd. (supra) related to a dismissed workman of colliery which was nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the bharat coking coal ltd. by virtue of the provisions contained in the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. this change occurred during the pendency of an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)
..... , vol. viii, the word 'occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , and it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1979WLN640
N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. In the above appeal a caveat had been filed on behalf of the respondent under Rule 159 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules. The counsel for both the parties had agreed to argue the appeal itself. The record of the case was, therefore, called and both the learned Counsel for the parties were heard at length.2. The plaintiff landlord filed a suit against the defendant-tenant for eviction of certain premises situate at Ladpura Kota The only ground on which the plaintiff landlord has sought eviction is of material alteration in the Premises as contained in Section 13(1)(c) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, (hereinafter called 'the Act'). It was alleged the plaint that in January, 1973, the defendant tenant made the following material alterations in the suit premises:(i) the back wall and the two side walls of one Kelu Posh' room were raised;(ii) the 'Kelu Posh' roof of the room was removed and it has been replaced with cement sheets;(iii) F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1978Raj72
..... constitutional provisions and more particularly the oath which he undertakes, do not connote that the governor is the subordinate to the president. i am fortified in this conclusion of mine by a decision of supreme court of canada in the king v. dame juliette carroll, et. a1. reported in 1948 scr canada 126. in that case the provisions ..... dr. g.c. pande was a purely voluntary act. it shows the taking of deliberate step of cool and calculated reflection of the circumstances prevailing. this conclusion of mine is further reinforced by the fact that the outgoing vice-chancellor dr. g.c. pande called a meeting of the syndicate held on july 14, 1977, who presided ..... the governor-general himself, is, for all purposes of dominion government; liquidators of the maritime bank of canada v. receiver-general of new brunswick, (1892) ac 437; bonanza creek gold mining v. r., (1916) 1 ac 566; in re : initiative and referendum act case (1919) ac 935.52. in the king v. dame juliette carrol, (1948) scr 126, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj2366; 2004(5)WLC181
..... history of times and may assume every state of facts which can be conceived existing at the lime of legislation.'43. the principle was restated by madholkar, j. in burrakur coal company v. union of india, air 1961 sc 954. speaking for the constitution bench, he said:-'where the validity of a law made by a competent legislature is challenged in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj62
..... and conditions of service notwithstanding that such further rationalisation or revision is unrelated to, or unconnected with, the amalgamation of insurance companies or merger consequent on nationalisation of general insurance business.(3) the central government may, by notification, add to, amend or vary any scheme framed under this section.(4) the power ..... and the said amendment scheme of 2005 has been framed by the central government in exercise of powers conferred by section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. it shall, therefore, be worthwhile to notice the relevant provisions of act of 1972 and the said schemes; and the relevant parts ..... has been alleged and so far statutory provisions are concerned, according to the learned counsel for the respondents, only section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 ['the act of 1972'] and the amendment scheme of 2005 issued thereunder are of statutory character and rest all has been left by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [2003]131STC176(Raj); 2003(1)WLN281
..... clearly defined limits. the court was concerned with the determination of compensation payable to the appellant under the bihar land reforms act, 1950. by act of 1974, compensation payable for mines and minerals was restricted to three times of net income. the appellant contended that the date on which he became entitled to compensation was prior to the amending act, 1974 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1975Raj88; 1974(7)WLN808
B.P. Beri, C.J. 1. Captain Chand Narain Gautam, the appellant before us, obtained a decree for restitution of conjugal rights from the court of the learned District Judge, Jaipur. Smt. Saroj Gautam, the wife of the appellant, appealed to this Court against that decree and the learned single Judge reversed the same, aggrieved by which the husband comes up in an appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance. 2. It is not disputed that Captain Chand Narain Gautam and Smt. Saroj Gautam, hailing from Brahmin families, were married at Bundi on February 11, 1963. They have no issue from this union. At the time of marriage the husband held a Master's Degree in English Literature while the wife was studying in the final year of the Bachelor of Arts. She also obtained later a Master's degree in Political Science. The husband after marriage obtained a Commission in the Army and the couple came to live at Panjim (Gpa) and Panchmarhi (M. P.) and last resided together at Chaksu near ...
Tag this Judgment!