Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 12 payment of further amount Court: rajasthan Page 3 of about 61 results (0.076 seconds)

Nov 05 1960 (HC)

Janta Transport Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Regional Tr ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1961Raj98

..... and the regional transport authority was directed to reconsider their applications after giving them an opportunity of hearing in connection with the scheme relating to the nationalisation of the traas-port services by the state.thereafter the non-petitioners presented fresh applications for temporary permits. before considering these applications, the non-petitioners were ..... rejected which will introduce uncertainty, friction or confusion into the working, of the system.'then at page 19, he has summarized certain criterions suggested by lord coke for finding out the intention of the legislature. he writes that'to arrive at the real meaning, it is always necessary to get an exact conception ..... for the grant of a new permit under section 46 or section 54 during the pendency of the application.'(the underlining (here into ' '--ed.) is mine).with very great respect, i find it impossible for me to accept this substitution as a sound proposition. in the first place, speaking broadly, i can .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1981 (HC)

Sanwal Ram and Etc. Vs. Additional District Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj139

..... . i may take up here the first case of g. nageswara rao, (air 1959 sc 308) (supra) around which much argument has been advanced. in that case, a scheme for nationalisation of motor transport was published by the state transport undertaking and the state government invited objections to the scheme. the petitioners filed their objections, the secretary to the transport department .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2004 (HC)

Ashwani Chobisa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj389

..... quality was initiated by the central pollution control board and the work was entrusted by it to the central mine planning and design institute limited (cmpdil), a subsidiary of coal india limited, with the following objectives:-1. to prepare status report of the problems of pollution in aravali ..... pollutionnoise pollutionproblems related to solid waste management.environmental problems - the cmpdi & cpcb made several visits to the district and held extensive discussions with mine/crusher unit operators, state and central government officials. based on the study and discussions, the environmental problems in the aravali range in the ..... industrial areas/industrial estates or (b) areas earmarked for industries under the jurisdiction of industrial development authorities; (ii) widening and strengthening of highways; (iii) mining projects (major minerals) with lease area upto 25 hectares, (iv) units located in export processing zones, special economic zones and (v) modernization of existing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 1991 (HC)

Jarnail Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992CriLJ810; 1991(1)WLN476; 1991(2)WLN577

R.S. Verma, J.1. The question referred to this bench is:Whether Under Section 397(2), Cr. P.C. the expression 'interlocutory order' covers the framing of the charge during the trial or not.2. The petitioner before us is accused of sheltering Pakistani nationals in contravention of Sections 13 and 14 of the Foreigners Act. Suffice for the purposes of this discussion that the learned trial Magistrate, after having taken due cognizance of the aforesaid offences, framed charge against the, petitioner for the aforesaid offences on 22-4-89. The petitioner pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. However, he filed a revision petition before this Court Under Section 397, Cr. P.C. against the order framing the charge. The office raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the revision petition. The matter was placed before a learned single Judge of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged before the learned single Judge that the objection had been raised by the offi...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2003 (HC)

Aditya Cement Staff Club and Birla White Staff Club Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Raj)554; [2004]266ITR70(Raj)

..... employer, whether directly or through a fund, other than a recognised provident fund or an approved superannuation fund or a deposit-linked insurance fund established under section 3g of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 (46 of 1948), or as the case may be, section 6c of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1992 (HC)

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Under the R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500

..... as between the workmen and the corporation the id act is a special legislation and the lic act is a general legislation. likewise, when compensation on nationalisation is the question, the lic act is the special statute. an application of the generalia maxim as expounded by english text books and decisions leaves us ..... the high court. the supreme court examined the scheme of the life insurance corporation act and the industrial disputes act and observed that, so far as the nationalisation of insurance business is concerned, the lic act is a special legislation, but equally indubitably is the inference, from a bare perusal of the subject, ..... act does not speak at all with specific, reference to workmen. on the other hand, its powers relate to the general aspects of nationalisation of management when private businesses are nationalised and a plurality of problems which, incidentally, involve transfer of service of existing employees of insurers. the workmen qua workmen and industrial disuputes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1984 (HC)

Bhanwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj

..... one of the important factors to be considered in determining whether or not the reinstatement should be with full back wages and with continuity of employment. the above observations of mine would not prejudice the case of the petitioners in claiming back wages under section 31-c of the i.d. act by proper application. similarly they would not prejudice the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1972 (HC)

Mahender Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Raj.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1972WLN790

L.S. Mehta, J.1. This appeal emerges from the judgment, dated April 17, 1972, of Mr. Devi Singh, Sessions Judge, 'Ganganagar, convicting accused Mahender Singh and Vichiter Singh of the offence under Section 304/34 I.P.C. and sentencing each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years. 2. Succinct facts of this case are that Shiv Karan and deceased Udram were brothers. They had a command and, situate at the outskirts of village Bhuranpura, in Chak No. 13, RWD Shiv Karan had sold his land to Santa Singh, father of accused Mahender Singh and Vichiter Singh. Udram had filed a pre-emption suit in respect of this land in the court of Civil Judge, Hanumangarh. An application under Section 145, Cr. P.C. was also made by, Udram, to the court of sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hanumangarh On account of the litigation between the parties, the two accused bare enmity against, Udram deceased. It is alleged that a few days prior to the occurrence Mahendersingh had told Udram that he would so...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2007 (HC)

Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2008)16VST387(Raj)

Rajesh Balia, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of 'sada pan masala', mixed with tobacco in the brand name of Geetanjali, Zafri 2100 Gutkha, etc. The petitioner as a manufacturer is subject to excise duty and is also liable to sales tax under the State sales tax or Central sales tax, as the case may be, in respect of the transactions of sale entered by it.2. Vide impugned notification dated January 3, 2001 'zarda mixed pan masala including gutkha and churi' was added to the list of commodities on which the levy of tax under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 was extended. The petitioner is aggrieved with the levy of tax under the Act of 1999 on its product when its brand is carried into local area of State of Rajasthan for use, consumption or sale within such local area. He has challenged the constitutional validity of the Act of 1999 and the aforesaid notification issued thereunder.3. Amongst other grounds, the petitioner has challenged the levy being u...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1982 (HC)

H.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN321

..... points.34. viewed from this angle, i am convinced that i would be on firm foundation keeping in view the scheme of the act, history of nationalisation and legislative history referred to above, in taking the above view that the impugned notifications cannot be issued under section 11(2) and 49 of the act ..... read as under:the corporation, to begin with, had to take over the staff of the private insurers lest they should be thrown out of employment, on nationalisation. these private companies had no homogenous policy regarding conditions of service for their personnel, but when these heterogenous crowds under the same management (the corporation) divergent emoluments ..... was established under the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (here in after referred to as 'the act') with effect from 1st september, 1956; due to historical nationalisation wave.9. the life insurance corporation (here in after l i c ) introduced a self-contained code of work-norms in 1976 with in-built incentives and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //