Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 1 short title and commencement Court: supreme court of india Page 14 of about 365 results (0.280 seconds)

Waman Rao and ors Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1981)2SCC362; [1981]2SCR1

..... restrictions which the laws of the state may impose 'in the interests of the general public.' while the words cited are comprehensive enough to cover any scheme of nationalisation which the state may undertake, it is desirable to place the matter beyond doubt by a clarificatory addition to article 19(6). another article in regard to ..... correct law. as the gulf of time widened, says dias, judges became increasingly reluctant to challenge old decisions. the learned author cites the example of bracton and coke who always preferred older authorities. in fact, bracton had compiled a notebook of some two thousand cases as material for his treatise and employed some five hundred of ..... the full form of the principle, 'stare decisis et non quieta movere' which means 'to stand by decisions and not to distrub what is settled', was put by coke in its classic english version as : 'those things which have been so often adjudged ought to rest in peace'. such being the justification of the rule, it was .....

Ghulam Qadir Vs. Special Tribunal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2001(9)SC231; 2001(6)SCALE667; (2002)1SCC33

Sethi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Partition of India in 1947 resulted in the outbreak of communal riots which engulfed some parts of the country, particularly the then united Province of Punjab in Northern India. Human blood flowed in the rivers of Punjab which were the nerve center of Province's economy and known for being responsible for the progress, prosperity and welfare of the people. The fire which erupted in Punjab could not be contained by the chilling showing waters of rivers Jhelam and Chenab and its flames leapt over Jammu and Kashmir as well. In the name of religions, their followers and believers let loose the rein of terror, destruction and death. Thousands of Muslims and Hindus were massacred and millions forced to flee from their homes for safety of lives. The Hindus and Sikhs who were forced to leave their birth places on account of tribal riots followed by regular Pakistani aggression in the State were called refugees/displaced persons in the main land of Jammu and Kashmi...

Suhas H Pophale Vs. Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of any person in an unauthorised occupation. however, as far as the relationship between the respondent no.1, the other general insurance companies, lic, nationalised banks and such other government companies or corporations, on the one hand and their occupants/licencees/tenants on the other hand is concerned, such persons who ..... insurance corporation of india which is a government company registered under companies act, 1956, but incorporated as mandated under section 9 of the above referred nationalisation act. the central government holds not less than 51 per cent of the paid up share capital of the general insurance corporation. the above referred ..... and still is the insurance act, 1938. post-independence, the industrial policy resolution of 1956 stated that the life insurance industry in india was to be nationalised. therefore, the life insurance corporation act of 1956 was passed creating the life insurance corporation (lic), as a statutory corporation, and transferring the assets of .....

Lalit Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... being unable to pay the same. subsequently, respondent 3 which had taken over the management of respondent 4 became sick and proceedings were initiated under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974 (for short the act ). the appellant filed suit for recovery against the guarantors and the principal debtor of the amount claimed by it. the following preliminary ..... a naught merely because the appellant may not be able to recover money from the principal borrower. it may here be added that even as a result of the nationalisation act the liability of the principal borrower does not come to an end. it is only the mode of recovery which is referred to in the said act. ..... understood in the context of the scheme of the act and the purpose or object with which the power is conferred. as iyer, j.observed in chairman board of mining examination v. ramji46 to be literal in meaning is to see the skin and miss the soul. the judicial key to construction is the composite perception of the .....

Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... this indenture. to hold my teacher in this art equal to my own parents; to make him partner in my livelihood; when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his family as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral .....

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... called duress in strict sense) or by the threat of being killed, suffering some grievous bodily harm, or being unlawfully imprisoned (sometimes called menace, or duress per mines). duress also includes threatening, beating or imprisonment of the wife, parent or child of a person. . (emphasis supplied) 157. in another celebrated decision of this ..... ors. vs. the state of u.p., (1969) 1 scr219and gujarat urja vikas nigam ltd. vs. essar power ltd., (2008) 4 scc755195 (1987) 3 scc208196 for short, mines act 197 pratap singh vs. state of jharkhand & anr., (2005) 3 scc551and national legal services authority vs. union of india & ors., (2014) 5 scc438133 liberties vs. ..... at footnote no.102 paras 19-21 & 27-28); mahanivesh oils & foods pvt. ltd. (supra at footnote no.104 paras 25-27, 33-35, 37 & 38- 39].; obulapuram mining company pvt. ltd. vs. joint director, directorate of enforcement, government of india, ilr2017kar 1846 (paras 5 & 10-12); ajay kumar gupta & ors. vs. adjudicating authority (pmla) .....

Janhit Abhiyan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and doctrinaire of equality before the law, would most certainly advance the broader egalitarian principles and desirable constitutional goal of social and economic justice for all. [see : sanjeev coke manufacturing co. v. bharat coking coal ltd., (1983) 1 scc147 170. article 14 of the constitution of india corresponds to the last portion of section 1 of the 14th amendment of the american constitution .....

Maharaj Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC2602; (1977)1SCC155; [1977]1SCR1072

..... had been held on lands to which section 18(1) (a) to (c) applied. section 9, at this stage, needs to be read since it is geared to the nationalisation of zamindaris by providing for settlement, under the state, of some kinds of landed interests in existing owners or occupiers. section 9 states :private wells, trees in abadi and buildings ..... defendant's proposition. firstly, he argued that hats, bazars and melas were a distinct interest in the scheme of indian agrestic life and agrarian law. this right had been virtually nationalised by the act and only the state or the gaon sabha, save where section 18 (a) to (c) otherwise provided, could hold a fair. a ruling by this ..... upon land to which clauses (a) to (c) of sub-section (1) of section 18 apply, and(ii) in all sub-soil in such estates including rights, if any in mines and minerals, whether being worked or not; shall cease and be vested in the state of uttar pradesh free from all encumbrances; * * * * *8. reading the two sister sections .....

i.C. Golak Nath and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1643; 1967(0)BLJR818; [1967]2SCR762

..... not one of substance. it only removes some unnecessary words. the new sub-clause is innocuous except where it provides for the exclusion of citizens. it enables nationalisation of industries and trade. sub-clause (g) (to the generality of which the original clause (6) created some exceptions) allowed the state to make laws imposing ..... then the exercise of the right to practise profession or to carry on an occupation, trade or business could be suitably curtailed. it cannot be said that nationalisation is never in the interest of he general public. this amendment was thus within the provision for restricting the exercise of the fundamental right in sub-clause ..... . further still acquisition of estates and of rights therein and the taking over of property, amalgamation of corporations, extinguishment or modification of rights in companies and mines may be made regardless of arts. 14, 19 and 31. in addition 64 state acts are given special protection from the courts regardless of their contents .....

Viklad Coal Merchant, Patiala and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC95; 1983(2)SCALE619; (1984)1SCC619; [1984]1SCR657; 1984(16)LC11(SC)

..... this is necessary because the railway net work is divided into various railway such as western railway, central railways, meaning zonal railway administration and prior to nationalisation of the railways different companies operated different railways. sec, 27 was enacted in . the last decade of 19th century when different companies had set up the ..... where a station has an abbreviation'gx' appended to it,it would mean that the station is not open for outward booking of coal, coal shale, lignite, patent fuel, soft coke and hard coke in wagon loads. we fall to see how this regulatory arrangement violates section 28. in fact, this incidental arrangement helps in smoothly ..... scheme applicable to each field and the principles of transport nationalisation in force from time to time. a list of sponsoring authorities authorised to sponsor coal movements in this item is given in annexure 'b'.note- (a) coal in the above item c(iii) means 'coal as defined in colliery control order.'(b) besides the .....