Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 1 short title and commencement Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 365 results (0.333 seconds)

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , which came to be continued under the essential commodities act. the coal controller controlled the quality and quantity as noticed in ashoka smokeless coal india (p) 31 ltd. and others22. considering its vital importance, it became the only mineral which was nationalized in terms of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 and the coal mines nationalisation act 1973. the colliery control order 1945 was repealed and replaced ..... by the colliery collar control order 2000 w.e.f. 01.01.2000.32. the preamble to the nationalisation act reads as follows: an act to provide for the acquisition and transfer .....

M/s Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Pal Bhatia .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... respondents.3. the parliament enacted the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act ) providing for the acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule. the schedule to the nationalisation act contained a list of about 711 coal mines located in different parts of the country ..... reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.5377 of2015m/s bharat coking coal ltd. ...appellant(s) versus mahendra pal bhatia and ors. ...respondent(s) judgment v. ramasubramanian 1. what was contemplated to be a summary proceeding ..... of this court (also of a 3 member bench) in bharat coking coal ltd. vs. madanlal agrawal2, steers clear any air of suspicion. in this case, this court clarified that the extended meaning given to the word mine was to ensure that the activity of mining coal could be carried on in an uninterrupted fashion. this court also .....

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the argument that there is no specific provision in the act as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 does not carry the matter any further because the idea embedded in those provisions are implicit in the provisions of this enactment, as ..... itself. the question, therefore, is whether absence of specific provision as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 that the shareholding shall always be held by the government, will give a different complexion to these provisions. when the provisions of the act ..... the petition in the present case - that the residual disinvestment can occur only after the amendment of the nationalisation act 1976- is substantially similar to the first and second reliefs sought by maton mines mazdoor sangh, when they challenged the disinvestment of 2002 and 2014, on the basis of the decision in .....

M/S. Skj Coke Industries Ltd. Vs. Coal India Ltd and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... order, 2000 with effect from 1st january, 2000 but that factor is not of much significance so far as the present appeal is concerned. the basic coal mining industry is nationalised and largely controlled by the coal india ltd., a public sector undertaking. the appellants were approved linkage of said 4000 metric tonnes of low ash ..... sponsorship/recommendation letters from the concerned state govts., in the same manner as sponsorship/recommendation is required for other non-core sector units.24. case of m/s mahabir coke industries, guwahati, assam- the agenda item was discussed by the committee. as already decided in the previous agenda item (i.e. item no.23), all cokery ..... as contained in the second part of the resolution ought to imply the price for linked consumers only. the case of cct, ranchi and another vs. swarn rekha cokes and coals (p) ltd. and others [(2004) 6 scc689 was relied upon by the learned page 12 of 19 counsel for the appellants mainly for interpretation of the aforesaid .....

Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good; xxx xxx xxx an interesting discussion is contained in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs bharat coking coal ltd. & anr (1983) 1 scr1000at pages 1023 to 1025, on the scope of the expression material resources of the community and the expression ..... of the compulsory acquisition of the undertaking, the licensee was given a solatium of 10% of such book value. importantly, this court, after holding that nationalisation would come within the expression distribution for the purposes of article 39(b), engrafted another test when legislation claims the protection of article 31-c. the court ..... 735. also, in maharashtra state electricity board vs thana electric supply co. (1989) 3 scc616 at para 43, this court said: 43. the idea of nationalisation of a material resource of the community cannot be divorced from the idea of distribution of that resource in the community in a manner which advances common good. .....

Medical Council of India Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the amendment act, sub-section (2) was introduced in section 10 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. the said provision declared that the amounts specified in the fifth column of the first schedule against any coking coal mines or group of coking coal mine specified in the second column of the said schedule are required to be given ..... the custodian being appointed by the central government took over the management of coking coal mines and the said mines remained under the management of the central government through the custodian during the period from 17.10.1971 to 30.04.1972. the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 came into force w.e.f. 1.5.1972, ..... and the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to coking coal mines stood transferred to and vested absolutely in the central government free from all encumbrances .....

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. the Principle Secretary and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... captive end uses to be notified from time to time and to allow the private sector to set up coal washeries, it is considered necessary to amend the coal and coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. the coal mines (nationalization) amendment bill, 1992 seeks to achieve the aforesaid objectives. 37. section 3 of the cmn ..... , vide circular dated 12.12.2001, the central government, reviewing its earlier policy, allowed the state government companies or undertakings to do mining of coking and non-coking coal or lignite reserves either by opencast or underground method, anywhere in the country, subject to the conditions set out therein. under the revised ..... policy, the state government company/undertaking was permitted to mine non-coking coal and coking coal reserves or lignite by opencast/underground method without the restriction of isolated small pockets . having carefully examined the circular dated 12.12.2001 .....

Thressiamma Jacob and ors Vs. Geologist,dptt.of Mining and Geology And ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... corporation limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956. [28]. section 4 of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 4(1) on the appointed day, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the first schedule shall stand transferred to, and shall vest absolutely in, the central government, free from all ..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth not does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively[26]. providing for acquisition .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(7)SCALE590; (2007)4SCC397; 2007(2)LC966(SC)

..... -alia held as follows:25. shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with the hollowness or the self-condemnatory .....

Ashoka Smokeless Coal Ind. P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(1)CTLJ1(SC); JT2007(1)SC125; 2006(13)SCALE102; (2007)2SCC640; 2007(2)KCCRSN91

..... owners of the mines but which were located near about the nationalised coking coal mines were also identified ..... there was legislation in regard to the coking coal mines and then there was legislation in regard to all coal mines, coking as well as non-coking. by the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act all coking coal mines known to exist in the country were nationalised. coke oven plants which were part of the coking coal mines so nationalised being in or belonging to the owners of the mines also stood automatically nationalised. other coke oven plants which did not belong to the .....