Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-14-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF JUNE, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.394 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.325 OF2021IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.394/2021 BETWEEN:1. Nagraj S/o. Timmappa Aged about 49 years Occ: Head Constable 50 Mayakonda Police Station R/o behind Durgambika Temple A.K. Colony, Doddabathi Village Davanagere Taluk 577001.2. Sher Ali S/o. Md Hayathsab Aged about 41 years Occ: Head Constable 236 Mayakonda Police Station R/o Basaeshwara Extension Malebennur Village, Harihara Davanagere Taluk 577005. ...Appellants (By Sri. Shankarappa S - Advocate) 2 AND:1. State of Karnataka By Mayakonda Police Station Rep. by SPP High Court complex Bangalore 560 001.2. Vrundamma W/o. Marulusidappa Aged about 43 years House Wife R/at Vittalapura Village Davanagere Taluk Pin Code:577514. ...Respondents (By Sri. Thejesh .P, HCGP for R-1; Notice to R-2 held sufficient vide court order dated 04.06.2021) This Criminal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-14-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF JUNE, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.394 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.325 OF2021IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.394/2021 BETWEEN:1. Nagraj S/o. Timmappa Aged about 49 years Occ: Head Constable 50 Mayakonda Police Station R/o behind Durgambika Temple A.K. Colony, Doddabathi Village Davanagere Taluk 577001.2. Sher Ali S/o. Md Hayathsab Aged about 41 years Occ: Head Constable 236 Mayakonda Police Station R/o Basaeshwara Extension Malebennur Village, Harihara Davanagere Taluk 577005. ...Appellants (By Sri. Shankarappa S - Advocate) 2 AND:1. State of Karnataka By Mayakonda Police Station Rep. by SPP High Court complex Bangalore 560 001.2. Vrundamma W/o. Marulusidappa Aged about 43 years House Wife R/at Vittalapura Village Davanagere Taluk Pin Code:577514. ...Respondents (By Sri. Thejesh .P, HCGP for R-1; Notice to R-2 held sufficient vide court order dated 04.06.2021) This Criminal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-23-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF JULY, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.69 OF2017C/w CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.70/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.76/2017. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.96/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.97/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.98/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.105/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.106/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.107/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.110/2017, CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.111/2017, & CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.112/2017 In Crl.R.P.No.69/2017 BETWEEN: Sri. D. Srinivasa Rao Aged about 76 years, S/o. Late Laxminarayan Rao, R/o Quarters No.30/A T.S.W. Colony, Harige, Shivamogga-577 201 Presently residing at Retired employee Yelahanka, Bengaluru-560 022. ..Petitioner (By Sri. Nataraja Ballal, Advocate) AND: State by Enforcement Officer Employees Provident Funds, 1st Cross, Garden Area, Shivamogga Division...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-26-2021
W.P.(Crl.) No.409 of 2020, etc. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.409 OF2020STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ...Petitioner versus JAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) & Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH [Transfer Petition (Criminal) NO.104-114 of 2021]. JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.(Writ Petition (Crl.) No.409/2020) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by the State of Uttar Pradesh, seeking Writ of Mandamus, seeking appropriate directions, directing the respondent-State of Punjab and the Learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Mohali, 1 W.P.(Crl.) No.409 of 2020, etc. State of Punjab, to transfer the criminal proceedings and trial in the Case Crime No.05 of 2019, titled as State of Punjab v. Mukhtar Ansari, pending before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Mohali, State of Punjab, to the Court of Special Judge (MP/MLA), Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh and with a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-16-2021
..... basis, the high court affirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused. 149.. on careful perusal of the said judgment, it clearly depicts that though reference was made to section 173(8) of the code of criminal procedure, the hon ble supreme court proceeded to consider the powers of the magistrate after the final report submitted. with ..... investigation entrusted to it by the state government. the said process is uninhibited by the high prerogative judicial powers of entrustment of inquiry to cbi. the same is independent and does not have any fetters with regard to whether extraordinary judicial powers ..... 1 had entered into a conspiracy with accused nos.2 to 6 and on 15.6.2016, with a premeditated intention to kill the deceased, had alongwith accused nos.2 to 6 assaulted the deceased near the gym and caused the death of the deceased.6 ..... before the basic structure doctrine came to be propounded in the celebrated case of kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala [(1973) 4 scc225 , wherein while finding certain basic features of the constitution, it was opined that separation of powers is ..... criminal) 1348/2020.120. at this stage, it is relevant to state that petitioners filed these writ petitions challenging the government order dated 6.9.2019, in terms of which case relating to the murder of one yogesh gowda, member of dharwad zilla panchayat was made over by the state government to the cbi. while issuing notice in said writ petition, the learned single judge of this court by the order 176 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-16-2021
..... basis, the high court affirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused. 149.. on careful perusal of the said judgment, it clearly depicts that though reference was made to section 173(8) of the code of criminal procedure, the hon ble supreme court proceeded to consider the powers of the magistrate after the final report submitted. with ..... investigation entrusted to it by the state government. the said process is uninhibited by the high prerogative judicial powers of entrustment of inquiry to cbi. the same is independent and does not have any fetters with regard to whether extraordinary judicial powers ..... 1 had entered into a conspiracy with accused nos.2 to 6 and on 15.6.2016, with a premeditated intention to kill the deceased, had alongwith accused nos.2 to 6 assaulted the deceased near the gym and caused the death of the deceased.6 ..... before the basic structure doctrine came to be propounded in the celebrated case of kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala [(1973) 4 scc225 , wherein while finding certain basic features of the constitution, it was opined that separation of powers is ..... criminal) 1348/2020.120. at this stage, it is relevant to state that petitioners filed these writ petitions challenging the government order dated 6.9.2019, in terms of which case relating to the murder of one yogesh gowda, member of dharwad zilla panchayat was made over by the state government to the cbi. while issuing notice in said writ petition, the learned single judge of this court by the order 176 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-16-2021
..... basis, the high court affirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused. 149.. on careful perusal of the said judgment, it clearly depicts that though reference was made to section 173(8) of the code of criminal procedure, the hon ble supreme court proceeded to consider the powers of the magistrate after the final report submitted. with ..... investigation entrusted to it by the state government. the said process is uninhibited by the high prerogative judicial powers of entrustment of inquiry to cbi. the same is independent and does not have any fetters with regard to whether extraordinary judicial powers ..... 1 had entered into a conspiracy with accused nos.2 to 6 and on 15.6.2016, with a premeditated intention to kill the deceased, had alongwith accused nos.2 to 6 assaulted the deceased near the gym and caused the death of the deceased.6 ..... before the basic structure doctrine came to be propounded in the celebrated case of kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala [(1973) 4 scc225 , wherein while finding certain basic features of the constitution, it was opined that separation of powers is ..... criminal) 1348/2020.120. at this stage, it is relevant to state that petitioners filed these writ petitions challenging the government order dated 6.9.2019, in terms of which case relating to the murder of one yogesh gowda, member of dharwad zilla panchayat was made over by the state government to the cbi. while issuing notice in said writ petition, the learned single judge of this court by the order 176 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-16-2021
..... basis, the high court affirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused. 149.. on careful perusal of the said judgment, it clearly depicts that though reference was made to section 173(8) of the code of criminal procedure, the hon ble supreme court proceeded to consider the powers of the magistrate after the final report submitted. with ..... investigation entrusted to it by the state government. the said process is uninhibited by the high prerogative judicial powers of entrustment of inquiry to cbi. the same is independent and does not have any fetters with regard to whether extraordinary judicial powers ..... 1 had entered into a conspiracy with accused nos.2 to 6 and on 15.6.2016, with a premeditated intention to kill the deceased, had alongwith accused nos.2 to 6 assaulted the deceased near the gym and caused the death of the deceased.6 ..... before the basic structure doctrine came to be propounded in the celebrated case of kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala [(1973) 4 scc225 , wherein while finding certain basic features of the constitution, it was opined that separation of powers is ..... criminal) 1348/2020.120. at this stage, it is relevant to state that petitioners filed these writ petitions challenging the government order dated 6.9.2019, in terms of which case relating to the murder of one yogesh gowda, member of dharwad zilla panchayat was made over by the state government to the cbi. while issuing notice in said writ petition, the learned single judge of this court by the order 176 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-16-2021
..... basis, the high court affirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused. 149.. on careful perusal of the said judgment, it clearly depicts that though reference was made to section 173(8) of the code of criminal procedure, the hon ble supreme court proceeded to consider the powers of the magistrate after the final report submitted. with ..... investigation entrusted to it by the state government. the said process is uninhibited by the high prerogative judicial powers of entrustment of inquiry to cbi. the same is independent and does not have any fetters with regard to whether extraordinary judicial powers ..... 1 had entered into a conspiracy with accused nos.2 to 6 and on 15.6.2016, with a premeditated intention to kill the deceased, had alongwith accused nos.2 to 6 assaulted the deceased near the gym and caused the death of the deceased.6 ..... before the basic structure doctrine came to be propounded in the celebrated case of kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala [(1973) 4 scc225 , wherein while finding certain basic features of the constitution, it was opined that separation of powers is ..... criminal) 1348/2020.120. at this stage, it is relevant to state that petitioners filed these writ petitions challenging the government order dated 6.9.2019, in terms of which case relating to the murder of one yogesh gowda, member of dharwad zilla panchayat was made over by the state government to the cbi. while issuing notice in said writ petition, the learned single judge of this court by the order 176 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-08-2021
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.1068 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.6564 of 2019) M/s Gimpex Private Limited ... Appellant Versus Manoj Goel ... Respondent With Criminal Appeal Nos. 1069-1075 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos. 7632-7638 of 2019) 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J A Factual Background ...........................................................................................3 B Submissions of parties .................................................................................... 12 C Analysis .............................................................................................................1 5 C.1 Parallel prosecutions ................................................................................. 15 C.2 Liability arising from the settlement agreement ..................................... 33 D Conclusion .................................................................
Tag this Judgment!