Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38780 CRL.P No.5840 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5840 OF2024BETWEEN: MR. PRIYANK KANOONGO CHAIRPERSON AGED ABOUT43YEARS NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS5H FLOOR, CHANDERLOK BUILDING36 JANPATH, NEW DELHI - 110 001 RESIDENT OF NEW DELHI. PETITIONER (BY SRI VATSAL JOSHI, ADVOCATE A/W., SRI VINAYAKA S.PANDIT, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH P.S. DEVARAJEEVANHALLI DISTRICT, BENGALURU CITY REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.2. MR. ASHRAF KHAN AGED ABOUT70YEARS S/O GOUSE KAHAN RESIDING AT No.384 SAYEED NAGAR, K.B. SANDRA, BENGALURU CITY - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38780 CRL.P No.5840 of 2024 KARNATAKA - 560 032. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI. MUZAFFAR AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C.,(528 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED2111.2024 I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC698NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.265 OF2022RABINA GHALE & ANR. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.250 OF2022ANJALI GUPTA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT VIKRAM NATH, J.1. The Writ Petition (Criminal) No.265 of 2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) No.250 of 2022 have been filed with the following prayers: (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the Suo moto FIR bearing State Crime Police Station (SCPS) Case WRIT PETITION (CRL) NOS. 265 & 250 OF2022Page 1 of 10 No.07/2021 registered by Respondent No.2, Complaint dated 07.12.2021 by the Respondent No.3, the Findings and recommendations of the SIT constituted by the Respondent No.2 dated 24.03.2022 seeking sanction to prosecute the husbands of the Petitioners along with 28 other Team members u/s 302, 307, 326, 201, 34 IPC r/w 120-B IPC and for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :07. 08.2024 Pronounced on :13. 09.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7330 OF2024BETWEEN: DR. SHIVAMURTHY MURUGHA SHARANARU S/O LATE GURUMURTHY AGED ABOUT66YEARS PEETADHYAKSHARU, MURUGHA RAJENDRA BRUHANMUT CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA - 577 502 (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) PERMANENT R/O GUDABANULU VILLAGE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.B.K.SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHITRADURGA RURAL POLICE STATION CHITRADURGA - 577 502 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR2HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CHANDRAKUMAR C., S/O CHAJJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT42YEARS LEGAL CUM PROBATION OFFICER DISTRICT CHILD PROTECTION UNIT NO.CA-15-17, ANJANADRI MAIN ROAD4H STAGE, 2ND BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA MYSURU - 560 032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC687IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3816 / 2024 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.11023 / 2024) Arvind Kejriwal .Appellant(s) versus Central Bureau of Investigation .Respondent(s) WITH Criminal Appeal No.3817 / 2024 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.10991 / 2024) JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, High Court), dismissing the Appellants challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Consequently, the High Court upheld the legality of the Appellants arrest and has summarily declined to exercise its concurrent jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, CrPC), thereby denying his prayer for regular bail. 1 | P age FACTS:3. At the very outset, it is essential to advert to the b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :30. 08.2024 Pronounced on :13. 09.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5030 OF2023BETWEEN:1. . SRI LINGESH K. S., S/O LATE SRI SOMASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT64YEARS EX-MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY(MLA) AND CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY(195) HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT KARIKATTEHALLY VILLAGE CHATCHATNAHALLI HASSAN 573 121. 2 . SRI G.K.KUMAR S/O KENCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT57YEARS MEMBER OF COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT HALEGENDEHALLY2HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. 3 . SMT. SHAILA MOHAN W/O SRI MOHAN AGED ABOUT52YEARS MEMBER OF COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT KE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.11440 OF2011C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.206 OF2018IN MFA No.11440/2011: BETWEEN:1. LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGED41YEARS, 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED36YEARS, 3. ANAND, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED13YEARS, THIRD APPELLANT IS A MINOR HENCE HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THE FIRST APPELLANT ALL ARE R/AT GINKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, AND NOW AT No.102M2D CROSS, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V.SHYAMAPRASAD, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 AND:1. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANZ INS. CO. LTD., No.132, SRI BALAJI SOVEREIGN, 2ND FLOOR, BEXT TO URBAN EDGE, BRIGADE ROA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.11440 OF2011C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.206 OF2018IN MFA No.11440/2011: BETWEEN:1. LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGED41YEARS, 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED36YEARS, 3. ANAND, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED13YEARS, THIRD APPELLANT IS A MINOR HENCE HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THE FIRST APPELLANT ALL ARE R/AT GINKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, AND NOW AT No.102M2D CROSS, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V.SHYAMAPRASAD, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 AND:1. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANZ INS. CO. LTD., No.132, SRI BALAJI SOVEREIGN, 2ND FLOOR, BEXT TO URBAN EDGE, BRIGADE ROA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC684Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3747 OF2024Ravinder Kumar Appellant versus State of Haryana ... Respondent JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The appellant claims that he has been practising as a general Physician since 2001 and as a Radiologist since 2007. On 27th April 2017, a team comprising four officers raided the appellant's clinic. Based on the complaint against one woman, Dhanpati (accused no.1), that she is running a racket of sex determination and medical termination of pregnancy, a decoy patient was selected. The allegation is that Dhanpati was contracted to do the medical termination of the pregnancy of the decoy patient. The decoy patient and shadow witness, S.I. Usha Rani, informed Dhanpati that they knew the sex of the foetus. Dhanpati called the decoy patient on 27th April 2017 at Criminal Appeal No.3747 of 2024 Page 1 of 14 8 am for MTP. The shadow witness informed Dhanpati that family memb...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC683REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3083 OF2024JASEELA SHAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant, who is the wife of one Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji (Shaji A.K.)1, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 4th March 2024 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1271 of 20232, vide which it has dismissed the said habeas corpus petition filed by 1 Hereinafter referred to as detenu. 2 habeas corpus petition 1 the appellant for production of the detenu, who was detained pursuant to the order of detention dated 31st August 20233 passed under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 19744.2. By order dated 31st of July 2024, this Court allowed the present appeal; quashed and set aside the impugned judgment and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:37322 CRL.P No.11994 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11994 OF2023BETWEEN:1. HANUMANTHA S/O SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, NEAR SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE, GUNJUR, VIRTHUR, BENGALURU 560 087.2. MANJUNATHA S/O PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT29YEARS, RESIDING AT No.272, NEAR DODDAMMA TEMPLE, GUNJUR, VARTHUR, BENGALURU 560 087. PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHASHI KIRAN V., ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VARTHUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:37322 CRL.P No.11994 of 2023 2. RAJ KUMAR PROBATIONARY POLICE OFFICER, VARTHUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU 560 087. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAGADEESHA B.N., ADDL.SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C.,(528 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS HEREIN WHO ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2IN C.C.NO...
Tag this Judgment!