Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1363
1. Dr. S.C. Mishra is the Chief Medical Officer working in Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi. His son Abhishek Mishra was studying in B.I.T., Mesra, Ranchi, Jharkhand.2. On 08.12.2006, he received a telephone call from one Ragini, the daughter of Shri Laloo Prasad Yadav, Union Railway Minister, who is also studying in same college and a college friend of his son, informing him that Abhishek his son got drowned in Dassam Fall.3. Then the parents of the deceased as well as the relatives of the deceased took flight and came to the spot on 09.12.2006, only on the next day.4. The body was fished out from Dassam Falls. He found serious cut injuries on the body of the deceased. Without conducting any investigation as to real cause of death, the police hurriedly made an announcement that death was due to drowning.5. He was informed that Ragini Kumari and two other friends, who accompanied to Dassam Falls, were taken to the Chief Minister's House on 08.12.2006 night. Thereafter, they we...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1341 of 2015 .. Trilok Singh ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Bhupinder Singh ...Opp. Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : - M/s Indrajeet Sinha & Arpan Mishra, Advs. For the Opp. Parties :- Mr. Vikash Kishore, Adv. . 02/10.01.2018 The instant petition seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.02.2015 rendered by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case No. 96/2007 whereunder the sole accused/opposite party no. 2 has been acquitted of the charges under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is suffering from a delay of 69 days. However, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length on the grounds of challenge and gone through the materials on record and also perused the impugned judgment. Briefly stated the prosecution case lodged by the complainant being Sakchi P. S. Case...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 267 of 2013 --- Court on its own motion --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Respondent --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti For the Petitioner: None For the Resp State: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. --- 25/ 18.12.2017 No one appears for the petitioner. However, learned A.P.P. for the State is present.2. We find from the pleadings on record that this criminal writ petition was registered on the basis of a letter written by one Gulacho Devi of village Hematpur Panchayat Sasokala, P.S. Gola, District - Ramgarh addressed to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court alleging that her husband Ramjit Mahatha had gone on being called on phone and has never returned. This Court appointed learned Advocate Mrs. Nisha Thakur as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court and directed the Advocate General of the Respondent State for furnishing instruction by order dated 26.11.2013....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 1869 of 2004 (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 29.09.2004, passed by the Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial Case No.60 of 2004.) ------- Jalsu Rautiya .. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, Addl. P.P. -------- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------- CAV on 27.11.2017 Pronounced on :18. 12.2017 Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.- In this appeal, the sole appellant is aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.09.2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial Case No.60 of 2004 corresponding to G.R. Case No.42 of 2004 whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 Cr. Appeal(DB) No.1309 of 2007 [Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.08.2007 passed by learned Presiding Officer, F.T.C.-III, Gumla in connection with Sessions Trial no.87 of 2000 ]. ..... 1.Lalu Oraon, Son of Late Bhagat Gandur Oraon 2.Budhu Oraon, Son of Jagu Oraon, Resident of village-Kamalpur, P.O. Bharno, Police Station-Bharno, District-Gumla . Appellants Versus State of Jharkhand ...Respondent ---- For the Appellants : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Addl. P.P. ----- PRESENT The Honble Mr. Justice Pramath Patnaik The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. S.N.Pathak ----- By Court: This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, both dated 27th August,2007, passed in Sessions Trial no.87 of 2000 by learned Presiding Officer, F.T.C.-III, Gumla, whereby the appellants herein have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 148 and 302 of Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous impris...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.245 of 2016 ---- 1. Dr. Jamshed J.Irani 2. Amar Inder Singh Dhillon Petitioners -versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Inspector of Factories, Jamshedpur Circle-I, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). Opposite Parties ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1011.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1512.2017 In this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings, initiated as against the petitioners in connection with C/2 Case No.2903 of 2001, including the order dated 15.05.2001, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur whereby cognizance was taken for an offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act and summons were directed to be issued against the petitioners.2. The case arises out of Factories Act. An accident had t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr.) No. 332 of 2013 .. Maqbool Sk. ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Home Department, Ranchi 2. The Director General of Police, Ranchi 3. The Inspector General of Police, Dumka 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dumka 5. The Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj 6. The Officer-In-Charge, Radhanagar(Rajmahal), Sahibganj 7. Moti Ur. Sk.8. Arshad Sk.9. Newcon Company Indira Gandhi Airport, New Delhi ...Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI For the Petitioner : - Mr. J.P. Jha, Sr. Advocate For the Resp.-State :- Mr. Bhawesh Kumar SC-II 31/12.12.2017 The instant writ petition was preferred seeking production of minor son of the petitioner namely Belal Sk. who was allured and enticed by the respondent no. 6 and 7 on 11.01.2012 and taken away for providing job without the consent of the petitioner.2. According to the petitioner, the boy...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1633of2017 DiwakarAcharya Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand throughC.B.I ........OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.2380of2017 AnilKumarSinha Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand throughC.B.I ........OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.2384of2017 TribhuwanNarayanSinha Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand throughC.B.I ........OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.2387of2017 [email protected] @PutchaRamkrishna Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand throughC.B.I ........OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.B.M.Tripathy,Sr.Advocate Mr.N.K.Jaiswal,Advocate FortheC.B.I :Mr.K.P.Deo,S.C C.A.V.On:27/11/2017 Pronouncedon11/12/2017 1. Sincealltheanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthesame casehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 20(A)/2016Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120Br/w420ofthe IndianPenalCodeandunde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 271 of 2015 ----- (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 01.04.2015 passed by the then Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 462 of 2005) ----- Jitan Marandi, son of Muchu Marandi, Resident of village-Badki Kumhria, PO & PS-Bengabad, District-Giridih .... Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... Respondent ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ------ P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ----- Per, S. Chandrashekhar, J: Aggrieved of judgment of conviction and sentence, both dated 01.04.2015 passed in Sessions Trial No. 462 of 2005, the appellant has preferred the present Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 271 of 2015 under section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The prosecution case unfolds in the fardbeyan of Sukra Marandi who is father of the deceased-Budhni Devi. He has stated before the Off...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2860 of 2017 1. Dr. Pawan Kumar Singh 2. Anil Kumar Sahu 3. Surendra Kumar Rohilla Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand through A.C.B. Opposite party With A.B.A. No. 2882 of 2017 Rajendra Prasad Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through A.C.B. Opposite party With A.B.A. No. 2896 of 2017 Hemlal Murmu Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through A.C.B. Opposite party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate For the A.C.B : Mr. T.N. Verma, S.C. --------- C.A.V. On 22.11.2017 Pronounced on _29 /11/2017 All the anticipatory bail application are heard together as they arose from the same F.I.R. and disposed of by the common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the A.C.B. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with the...
Tag this Judgment!