Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... committed an offence after june 23, 2006 when act no.25 of 2005 was notified and section 311a inserted in the code of criminal procedure, 1973. prior to june 23, 2006 even a magistrate could not direct a person accused to give specimen signatures or handwriting samples. even if the magistrate directed, the said evidence was held to be inadmissible as per the decision of the supreme court in air1980sc791state of ..... to punishment merely on the basis of answers given while he was being examined under section 313 crpc. but, sub-section (4) says that the answers given by the accused in response to his examination under crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 45 of 177 section 313 crpc can be taken into consideration in such an inquiry or trial. this court in hate singh bhagat singh [hate singh bhagat singh ..... 2000, 30,000/- on 1st february, 2000. this is further corroborated by the opinion of pw-51 who proved hand- writing of the appellant on the cheques ex.pw-51/158 to 176 except crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 110 of 177 ex.pw-51/163 for withdrawal of 1,06,000/- on 5th february, 1999 which was in the ..... investigation the cause of the death. it being relevant, it can be proved by producing the same. but production is only a step towards proof of it. it can be received in evidence only on the crl.a. 134/2016 & conn. matters page 30 of 177 establishment of its authenticity by the mode of its proof as provided under sections 67 to 71 of the evidence act. section 294(1) of the code enables .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~6 & 7 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Decided on:12. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 793/2014 MONIKA Through: Mr. Rajat Bali, Advocate along with ..... Appellant appellant produced from JC. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. SI Satish Yadav, PS Dwarka North. CRL.A. 787/2016 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. SI Satish Yadav, PS Dwarka North. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 07.05.2012, at about 2:35 p.m. upon intimation being received through Police Control Room (PCR), daily diary entry no.15- A was recorded at 2:35 p.m. in Police Station Dwarka Noth (Police Station) about some quarrel in the area of A Block, Sector 15, near Crl. A7932014 & 787/2016 Page 1 of 7 versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA KIRAN @ KISHAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Joginder Tuli, Amicus Curiae. Mother Dairy booth. Upon inquiry being made, Sub Inspector Umesh Kumar (PW-15) met one Arun Tiwari (P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~6 & 7 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Decided on:12. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 793/2014 MONIKA Through: Mr. Rajat Bali, Advocate along with ..... Appellant appellant produced from JC. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. SI Satish Yadav, PS Dwarka North. CRL.A. 787/2016 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. SI Satish Yadav, PS Dwarka North. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 07.05.2012, at about 2:35 p.m. upon intimation being received through Police Control Room (PCR), daily diary entry no.15- A was recorded at 2:35 p.m. in Police Station Dwarka Noth (Police Station) about some quarrel in the area of A Block, Sector 15, near Crl. A7932014 & 787/2016 Page 1 of 7 versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA KIRAN @ KISHAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Joginder Tuli, Amicus Curiae. Mother Dairy booth. Upon inquiry being made, Sub Inspector Umesh Kumar (PW-15) met one Arun Tiwari (P...
Tag this Judgment!