Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2019
$~23 & 24 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 53/2019 Decided on:2. d April, 2019 DAYA RAM Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Advocates versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. + CRL.A. 121/2019 FATEH SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M. Naushad, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have been held guilty and convicted and sentenced in case arising out of first information report (FIR) No.168/2012 of Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur for offences under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Crl. Appeal No.53/2019 & 121/2019 Page 1 of 20 court of sessions, by judgment dated 17.12.2018 an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2019
$~23 & 24 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 53/2019 Decided on:2. d April, 2019 DAYA RAM Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Advocates versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. + CRL.A. 121/2019 FATEH SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M. Naushad, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have been held guilty and convicted and sentenced in case arising out of first information report (FIR) No.168/2012 of Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur for offences under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Crl. Appeal No.53/2019 & 121/2019 Page 1 of 20 court of sessions, by judgment dated 17.12.2018 an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-11-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d December, 2019 Date of Decision:11. h December, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2381/2019 & CRL.M.As. 36899/2019 & 36370/2019 MONU KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Ashutosh & Ms. Fatima, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Junior Standing Counsel with Mohd. Shaz Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) for the grant of anticipatory bail.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as per the status report are that, on 6.09.2018, a seizure of gold was effected from a shop situated at 34/3128, Gali No.34, Beadonpura, BlockP, Karol Bagh, New Delhi 110005 and Lease Agreement of the said shop was in the name of Monu Kapoor, the petitioner herein.3. The statement of one Rahul Kapoor, present in the shop at the time of s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2019
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5210/2019 and CM APPL. 23055/2019 (stay) RITESH SONI Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel along with Mr.Shivanshu Tiwari, DC. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1012.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge by the... Petitioner in the present case is to an order dated 6th August, 2018 passed by the Deputy Inspector General (DIG), SHQ of the Border Security Force (BSF), Siliguri directing the Commandant 155th BN BSF to conduct a de novo trial on the charge sheet issued to the... Petitioner. The... Petitioner also challenges an order dated 18th April, 2019 issued by the... RESPONDENTS in rejecting the... Petitioners representation against the commencement of the trial against him de novo.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner, an Assistant Sub Inspector (Ministerial) [ASI(M)]. ha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 10.04.2019 Judgement pronounced on 09.12.2019 + EXECUTION PETITION No.79/2014 & EXECUTION APPLICATION (OS) Nos. 833/2015, 837/2015, 1122/2015, 167/2016, 68/2017 & 363/2017 JAYANT GHADIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain & Mr. Siddhant Nath, Advocates. versus HINDUSTAN TRADEX & MANUFACTURING PVT LTD AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, with Mr. Senior Advocate Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate, for judgment debtor No.1 Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocate, for objector Kuldeep Singh Dalal. Ms. Kajal Chandra with Ms. Prerna Chopra, Advocates, for Objector Ms. Amna Bi. Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Mrinal Srivastava, Advocates, for objector VP Gupta. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. Principally I have been called upon to adjudicate upon Ex. P. 79/2014 (in short Execution petition). This execution petition has been filed by one Mr. Jayant Ghadia (in short, Ghadia). Ghadia h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-06-2019
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4060/2019 & RL.M.A.33702/2019 & 36891/2019 MANMOHAN SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv with Mr. Kushank Singh, Mr. Abhinav, Mr. Yashovardhan & Mr. Syed Massod, Advocates STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Dharmender, PS Vasant Kunj (N) Mr. Sunny Sharma & Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek directions thereby to quash the FIR No.576/2016 dated 02.12.2016, registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj North, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 323/ 341/354/354B/5IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.2. The case of the petitioners is that they are residents of Sector-A, Pocket-B & C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and respondent no.2 is the complainant in the FIR mentioned above, filed against the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-05-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2019 CM (M) 1375/2018 & CM APPL. 46175/2019 RAJESH ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma & Mr. Yugant Kuhar, Advocates (M-9999989082) RAHUL WADHWANI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. Sachin Sangwan, Mr. Sachin Choudhary & Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocates (M- 9811164628) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff/Petitioner (hereinafter, Plaintiff) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 1st June, 2018, by which the ld. ADJ has dismissed the application under Order XV-A CPC.2. The case of the Plaintiff is that he is the owner of shop bearing No.6 (private No.6A), adjoining Shop No.5, Central Market, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi - 110024 (hereinafter, suit property). The Plaintiff claims to have purchased the suit property from one Ms. Pushpa Kapoor vide registered sale deed dated 7th September, 2015. A copy of the registered sale deed h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-04-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 2024/2018& Crl. M.A. 7164/2018, 7786/2018, 7787/2018 & 28577/2018 SHUBHAM BANSAL Through Mr.S.C. Buttan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. SI Sandeep Crime Branch R.K. Puram. Mr. J.M. Kalia, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the observations of the learned Court passed in application under section 173(8) Cr.P.C. in FIR No.130/2012 in case titled State vs. Shubham Kansal.2. Further seeks direction thereby setting aside order dated 04.01.2017 passed in Criminal Revision No.138/2016 and restore order dated CRL.M.C.2024/2018 Page 1 of 16 26.02.2016 passed by learned CMM whereby proceedings under Section 66A, IT Act and Section 509 IPC against the petitioner h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-04-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Reserved on:23. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 KARTAR SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mahipal Singh Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.K.K. Ghai, APP for State. Insp.Sunil Kumar, SHO/Alipur. Mr.Atul Guleria, Adv. with Mr.Gautam Mann, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside/quash impugned order dated 06.02.2019 passed by learned ASJ, (North) District Courts, Rohini Courts Delhi in the interest of justice and equity.2. Brief facts of the case are that in the intervening night of 29/30.08.2018 at about 1:00 AM, petitioner No.l was informed by Mr. Vikas, friend of Mr. Ashish Kumar s/o petitioner No.l, that Ashish Kumar CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Page 1 of 21 has been arrested by the local police and taken to Police Station, Alipur, Delhi.... Petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-03-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 234/2019 Reserved on :17. 10.2019 Pronounced on:03. 12.2019 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar & Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kirat Singh Nagra, Mr. Kartik Yadav, Mr. Pranav, Mr. Parinay T. Vasandani, Mr. Karanvir Singh, Mr. Shantanu Parashar & Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Advocates versus EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Arvind Nayar, Senior Advocates with Mr. Krishna Vijay Singh, Mr. Manish Dembla, Mr. Nachiketa Goyal, Mr. Pradyuman Sewar & Mr. Parakram Roy, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking interim injunction restraining the respondents from invoking Retention Money Bank Guarantees (RMBG) for Rs.13,84,35,000/- each dated 18.04.2014 and 08.09.2014 respectively as well as Perform...
Tag this Judgment!