Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)411; 92(2001)DLT179; II(2001)DMC690; 2001(59)DRJ467
ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J 1. This is a petition under section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 140/99 u/s 498A/406 IPC PS Patel Nagar qua the petitioner; the married sister-in-law 'Nanad' of the complainant (Respondent no. 2).Admit.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and respondent no. 2 who is appearing is person.3. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are: on 16.1.1994 (Respondent No. 2- complainant) was married to Major Sanjeev Kaloti who was serving in the Indian Army; the marriage was solemnised in Delhi; she lived with her husband at the places of his postings, firstly at Kanput and at Dibrugarh, Assam. The petitioner, at the time of marriage of her brother Sanjeev was working as an assistant in the Ministry of Finance, Delhi was allotted Government accommodation. On 16.11.1997 the petitioner was married and she is living in her matrimonial home at Noida. On 9th June, 1998 respondent no. 2 sent a detailed complai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1989Delhi632; 1989RLR115
P.K. Bahri, J. (1) This criminal revision is directed against judgment dated October 4, 1985, of Shri V. S. Aggarwal, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, by which he had allowed the criminal revision filed by respondents-Joginder Lal and Smt. Taro Devi and had quashed the proceeding initiated under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for Short 'Cr. P.C.') and also the order by which the shop in question had been attached under Section 146 Criminal Procedure Code . (2) Facts leading to the filing of the present petition, in brier, are that the petitioner's father Atam Parkash was allottee of Shop No. 277, Old Lajpat Rai Market. Delhi mid was given possession of the same by the Rehabilitation Department on January 31, 1960. Atam Parkash had entered into a partnership with his son-in-law Pritam Dass on March 26, 1968 and a partnership business in the electronics and allied goods was carried on in the said shop. The said partnership was stated to be at will and the. name of the pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1997CriLJ4608; 68(1997)DLT274; 1997(42)DRJ472
J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This Revision petition is filed against the order dated 14th January, 1997 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi declining the permission to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution against respondent No. 1 on the ground of non-application of mind by the Public Prosecutor while filing the application under Section 321 Criminal Procedure Code .(2) The facts giving rise to the present petition in brief are that a report under Section 193 Criminal Procedure Code . was filed against accused Syed Ahmed Bhukhari the Naib Imam of Jama Masjid of Delhi by the prosecution on the allegations that on 22.1.1993 from Jama Masjid accused brought haltered and disaffection towards the Government established by law. It was further alleged that in a statement he attacked the constitutionally established Government, some political parties and some religious community. As per the allegations of the prosecution an offence under Section 124A Indian Penal Code of sedition w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1973Delhi926; 1974RLR191
Prithvi Raj, J. (1) The petitioner by this petition filed under section 561-A Criminal Procedure Code . has prayed that the proceedings pending before Shri Brijesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, against him and four others on a complaint filed by respondent Ladha Singh under section 352/341/504/506/147/149 I. P. C. be quashed. The grounds on which the proceedings are sought to be quashed are alleged to be that the petitioner earlier on 9th March, 1973, filed a complaint in the Court of Shri Brijesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, under sections 506/323/295/500 1. P. C. read with section 34 1. P. C. against respondent Ladha Singh and one Kartar Singh son of Ajaib Singh on the allegation that on 12th February, 1973, when the petitioner was returning from Gurdwara Sin Guru Singh Sabha Ali Ganj after having attended the monthly Sangrand Jor Mela he was waylaid by Ladha Singh and Kartar Singh near Ali Ganj Post Office. Ladha Singh 'respondent was stated to have caught hold of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1984(2)Crimes67; 25(1984)DLT306; 1984(6)DRJ54; 1984RLR37
H.L. Anand, J.(1) This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure arises out a complaint filed by Ram Avtar, respondent No. I, against his father, petitioner No. I, his brother petitioner No. 2, and a cousin, petitioner No. 3, on the allegations that the petitioners were party to a conspiracy to defraud the complainant to commit acts of misappropriation and in furtherance of the conspiracy, the petitioners committed offences of fraud, misappropriation, forgery and using forged documents in the Civil Court and certain authorities thereby committing offences under Section 406, 420, 467, 568 and 471 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code . The complaint, which is rather clumsily drawn, is an apparent sequel to disputes between Ram Avtar, on the one hand, and his father and brother, on the other, and has its genesis in the family partnership in the name and style of M, Silco, of which the complainant was a partner. The partnership apparently holds valuable premises,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :30th November, 2017 Date of decision :12th June, 2018 CRL.M.C. 5247/2015 SUDHIR SEHGAL STATE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. APS Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Maninder Jeet Singh, Advocate for Intervenor. SI Navee, PS Subzi Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 14.09.2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Criminal Revision No.02/2014 whereby the order dated 16.12.2013 of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in the Criminal Complaint No.31was upheld whereby a prima facie case was held to be made out against the CRL.M.C. 5247/2015 Page 1 of 33 petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:30. 10.2014 Judgment pronounced on:28. 05.2015 + CRL.A.1415/2012 RAM PHAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.P.K.Dey, Advocate with Mr.Kaushik Dey and Mr.Vijay Pal Singh, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate/ Amicus Curiae instructed by Ms.Manvi Priya, Advocate Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Mr.Krishnan Venugopal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Siddharth, Advocate for R-7 Mr.Javed Ahmad, Advocate with Mr.Zeshan Khan, Advocate in Crl.A.No.939/2012 Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Badar Mehmood, Mr.Shishir Mathur, Mr.Pranav Mathur, Mr.Amish Dabas and Mr.Devinder Dedha Advocates for Mr.Pawan Kumar, APP in Crl.A.No.151/2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % CRL.A.1415/2012 Page 1 1. This is a reference to a Full Bench in Crl. A. No.1451/2012. The reference stems from i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. Pursuant to a departmental enquiry, Satish Kumar, a constable in Delhi Police, the applicant herein, has been inflicted punishment of forfeiture of one year's approved service temporarily for a period of one year entailing reduction in his pay from Rs. 4560/- p.m. to Rs. 4475/- p.m. The enquiry officer after recording the statements of HC Suraj Singh (PW-1), W/HC Adesh Kumari (PW-2), ASI Harpal singh (PW-3), SI Jasvinder Singh (PW-4), Krishan Singh (PW-5), Const. Syambir Singh (PW-6) and Inspr. Ishwar Singh (PW-7), framed the following charge against the applicant: You Const. Satish Kumar No. 2149/SD is hereby charged that while you were posted in P.S. Hauz Khas, on 16/07/99 at about 2.35 A.M. you const. Satish Kumar illegally trespassed in the flat No. F-4 Police Colony, P.S. Hauz Khas of Inspector Ishwar Singh while you were under the influence of liquor and was wearing only underwear. Shri Krishan Singh brother of Inspector Ishwar Singh was sleeping in the room who awakened and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~47 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4261/2018 and Crl.M.A.30558-30559/2018 DARSHAN LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Advocate with Mr. Lal Bahadur Sahu, & Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State with SI Pawan, PS Kalkaji Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. By the petition at hand, the petitioner invokes the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to seek quashing of the proceedings in the Sessions Case No.33 of 2018 pending in the court of Special Judge (Electricity Act) for South-District of Saket Court Complex, New Delhi, it having arisen and been registered, inter alia, on the basis of report filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. after conclusion of the investigation into first information report (FIR) No.597/2015, registered at t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:03. 09.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:19. 11.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 1280/2019 M/S VASHISHT INFRATECH PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Attin Rastogi, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Mr. R. K. Singh, Ms. Beauty Singh and Mr. Randeep Punder, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Mr. Karan Jeet Rai Sharma with SI Vinod Yadav from EOW. Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Vivek Jain, Adv. For R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J1 This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 482Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners for quashing of W.P.(CRL) 1280/2019 Page 1 of 10 FIR No.07u/s 420/468/471/34/120B IPC, PS Najafgarh, New Delhi.2. While praying for quashing of FIR, the petitioner has pleaded that petitioner no.1 who is a Pvt. Ltd. company through its Director/AR Mr. Karan Vashishta @ Madhup Vashisht i.e. petitioner no.2 a...
Tag this Judgment!