Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2013 % + WP (C) No.4770/2012 & CM Nos. 9869/2012 (for stay), 11129/2012 (for impleadment), 16545/2012 (for intervention/impleadment), 16845/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment), 16882/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment) DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs. Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mathur, P-2 in WP (C) No.4770/2012 in person and Ms. Sandhya Gupta & Mr.Ritesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv. with Ms. Sanorita D. Bharali, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Bar Association & Dwarka Bar Association for applicants in CM Nos.16545/2012, 16845/2012 & 16882/2012. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through : Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nakul Dewan, Mr. J.M. Kalia, Mr. Raghav Shankar & Ms.Bhawna Garg, Advs. for Govt. of NCT of Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2013 % + WP (C) No.4770/2012 & CM Nos. 9869/2012 (for stay), 11129/2012 (for impleadment), 16545/2012 (for intervention/impleadment), 16845/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment), 16882/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment) DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shyam Sharma, Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs. Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mathur, P-2 in WP (C) No.4770/2012 in person and Ms. Sandhya Gupta & Mr.Ritesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv. with Ms. Sanorita D. Bharali, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Bar Association & Dwarka Bar Association for applicants in CM Nos.16545/2012, 16845/2012 & 16882/2012. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through : Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nakul Dewan, Mr. J.M. Kalia, Mr. Raghav Shankar & Ms.Bhawna Garg, Advs. for Gov...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 48(1992)DLT140; 1992(1)DRJ24
Sat Pal, J.(1) This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') is directed against First Information. Report bearing crime No.RCI(A)/90/ACU-IV registered against certain unnamed persons and three named persons, namely, S/Shri Martin Ardgo, former President of Bofors A.B. (for short called 'Bofors'), G.P.Hinduja of London and the petitioner W.N. Chadha @ Win Chadha alleging commission of offences under sections 120B read with Sections 161, 162, 163, 164 and 165A of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 5(2)/5(l)(d) and 5(2)/5(l)(c) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 read with sections 409, 420, 463 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition the petitioner, inter alia, has prayed for quashing of the aforesaid First Information Report and the proceedings and the orders passed thereon and arising there from including the letter rogatory issued by the Specia...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13. h May, 2013 Pronounced on :22nd May, 2013 % + W.P.(CRL) 545/2003 R.P.MALIK Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.J.K.Chawla, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Saleem Ahmed, Addl. Standing Counsel for the State with ACP Sheel Nidhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. In the year 2003, the petitioner R.P.Malik filed this Criminal Writ Petition No.545/2003 invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC for issuance of appropriate writ or direction for quashing the FIR No.60/2000 under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as P.C. Act) as well the chargesheet and the proceedings arising therefrom. In addition, the petitioner has also prayed for issuance of appropriate writ or direction to the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs (in pr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:02. 05.2013 Judgment delivered on:16. 05.2013 + FAO(OS) 364/2011 WEIZMANN LTD. .....Appellant Vs MS. SHOES EAST LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Advocates appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr M.L. Sharma & Ms Suman, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Pavan Sachdeva, (Adv.) MD of the respondent. Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr Ritesh Kumar, Mr Sidharth Tyagi, Ms Shweta Gupta, Ms Honey Kumari, Ms Mallika Ahluwalia & Mr Prabhjeet Singh, Advs. Dr. Arun Mohan, Amicus Curiae (Sr. Advocate) with Mr Arvind Bhatt, Adv. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON''BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.This appeal has been referred to a Larger Bench in view of the judgment rendered by a Division bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Jaiswal vs Semjeet Singh Brar & Ors. 2012 (131) DRJ 479.wherein the view taken is that, an appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent is not avail...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2013 CRL.REV.P. 438/2010 & CRL. M.A. 13980/2010 SAJJAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amerinder Saran, Sr. Advocate with Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates and Mr. R.M.Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. AND + CRL.REV.P. 439/2010 & CRL. M.A. 13984/2010 VED PRAKASH PIAL @ VEDU PARDHAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. R.M. Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. Crl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Suresh Kait, J. 1. Vide the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) petitioners seek directions thereby quashing the order dated 11.01.2005 whereby they have been summoned in Crl. Complaint Case No. 329/2001 pending before the Trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 323/427/448 of the IPC. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 29.01.1999, case FIR No. RC-S-18-99-E0001 was registered by CBI against some unknown persons. On 04.03.1999, searches were conducted by petitioner no. 1, the investigating officer of the case at the premises of respondent no. 2 Ashok Kumar Aggarwal. On 17.09.1999, preliminary enquiry in respect of disproportionate assets alleged to have been accumulated by respondent no. 2 was registered. Thereafter on 07.12.1999, case FIR NO.RC-S-19-99- E0006 was registered against respondent no. 2 for amassing disproportionate assets to his known sources of income to the tune of Rs. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t May, 2015 + W.P.(CRL) 771/2014 & Crl.M.A.5999/2014 (stay) MANOJ BAJPAI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.V.N.Jha and Ms.Deepti Dwivedi, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC (Crl.) for State along with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Advocate with SI Pinki Rana, PS Ashok Nagar. Complainant along with her advocate. (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.19/2013 u/s 376 IPC dated 17th January, 2013 registered with PS Ashok Nagar, Delhi and the consequential proceedings emanating there from.2. Following facts emerged from the charge sheet:- On 17th January, 2013, the complainant Seema Mohal came to police station and got recorded her statement which is as under:Statement of S...
Tag this Judgment!