Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: code of civil procedure 1908 section 85 persons specially appointed by government to prosecute or defend on behalf of foreign rulers Page 1 of about 83 results (0.282 seconds)

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

..... code of criminal procedure by the advocate for the appellant/accused no.2 praying that this honble court may be pleased to set aside the judgment and order of conviction dated: 27.09.2014 passed by the 36th additional city civil and sessions judge, (special court for trial of criminal cases against kum.j jayalalitha and others) at bangalore in spl.c.c.no.208/2004 convicting appellant/accused no.2 for the offence punishable under section 120-b of indian penal code read with section 13(1)(e) read with section ..... . besides, once cognizance is taken of the complaint, the prosecution has to only show that the accused or some person on her behalf is in possession of pecuniary resources for which the public servant or the said some other person cannot satisfactorily account for and once that is established, it ..... four months, inspite of it, the government of karnataka has not taken steps either to appoint special public prosecutor ..... or immoral secretions, but in the facts of the present case, when a-1 claims to have received huge sum of rs.2 crores and foreign remittance as presents and gifts after she assumed the office of the chief minister creates serious doubts and suspicion about the character of ..... is used to circumvent law, to defeat public policy, perpetuate fraud or illegality and used as a cover or fa ade to justify wrong, defend crime, to lend a name to private dealing, law will not regard the company as a corporate entity and afford the protection which ..... to the then rulers and that .....

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D./W ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR447(Madras); (2004)2MLJ470

..... section 2 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 contains the definition clause. ..... in view of the specific provision contained in section 2(e) of the act read with section 2(4) of the code of civil procedure, it must be taken that the expression 'court' as contained in sections 34 and 36 of the act is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in a district, that is to say, the district court or the district judge.14. ..... as per section 3, the number of district courts to be established shall be fixed by the state government.under section 3-a, when the state of business pending before the judge of any district court (district judge) so requires, the state government may appoint one or more additional district judges to that court. ..... even though in respect of ordinary civil suits, by applying section 15, a court of subordinate judge can be said to have jurisdiction (subject to its pecuniary jurisdiction), this general principle cannot be made applicable to the special provisions contained in different statutes such as the indian companies act and other such specific acts.13. ..... section 34 of the act enables a person aggrieved by the award of the arbitrator to raise objection challenging the validity of the award before the court.10. ..... moreover, the order passed by such court not having territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction need not be set aside by the appellate court unless it is found that the person raising such objection has been prejudiced in any manner. .....

Srividya C G Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Supratim Sarkar Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Sri K Ravi Nedungadi Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Rishabh Mishra Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Vinod Wadhawani Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Sri Ashok Wadhwa Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Mr Sujal Shah Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....

Ambit Private Limited Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... the special court established under section 435 cannot be equated with the court established under section 9 of cr.pc, since the power to establish and appoint a presiding officer is vested with the state government insofar as it relates to the sessions court under section 9 of cr.pc, and with the central government insofar as it relates to the special court under section ..... advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... section 2 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offence of this act alleged to have been committed by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf .....