Skip to content


Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Rule 3 To 9 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: code of civil procedure 1908 rule 3 to 9 Year: 1941 Page 1 of about 344 results (2.212 seconds)
Dec 17 1941 (PC)

Govind Narayan Prabhu Vs. Bhiku Gopal Mhale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-17-1941

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR409

..... of section 257a of the old code of civil procedure act xiv of 1882 by the new code act v of 1908 that section of the dekkhan agriculturists ..... conditions was made with reference to o xxi rule 83 of the civil procedure code 1908 and could not be regarded as equivalent to the sanction which ..... 1907 i l r 31 bom 552 s c 9 bom l r 950 referred to 3 that the amount of rs 242 added as interest in advance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1941 (PC)

Atmaram Nemchand Gujar Vs. Mallappa Appayya Kotiwale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1941

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR880

..... a part payment of a decretal debt under order xxi rule 2 of the civil procedure code 1908 cannot be regarded as an application within the meaning of ..... of costs sen j i agree civil procedure code act v of 1908 order xxi rule 2 indian limitation act ix of 1908 articles 181 182 5 application to ..... of the fndian limitation act so as to save limitation 3 in bacharaj nyahalchand v babaji tukaram 1913 i l r .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 1941 (PC)

Vithalbhai Shivabha Patel Vs. Lalbhai Bhimbhai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-15-1941

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR380

..... 14 of the civil procedure code 1908 it is obligatory an the court to presume that the foreign court passing a decree is a court ..... office of the imperial procurator of the civil tribunal of the department in which the office of ..... brought was incurred in that country or 3 from the fact that the defendant was carrying on ..... bank of australasta v harding 1850 9 c b 661 bank of australasia v nias 1851 16 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 1941 (PC)

Vishnu Balkrishna Naik Vs. Shankareppa Gurlingappa Wagarali

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1941

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR415

..... before judgment ceased under o xxi rule 57 of the civil procedure code 1908 as the application of 1932 was dismissed for ..... his mortgage had been satisfied 3 that it was difficult to say particularly in view ..... section 276 of the civil procedure code which corresponds to section 64 of the present code was to make void ..... against the intention of the parties 9 these remarks in our opinion apply with equal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1941 (PC)

Ganpat Kinushet Sonar Vs. Vithal Bhikan Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1941

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR976

..... the construction and application of order xxiii rule 1 of the civil procedure code 1908 the facts are very simple the defendant ..... on reference to section 230 of the old code that claim proceedings under the section which were numbered ..... a suit in the first sentence of clause 3 of rule 1 of order xxiii is to be taken ..... award is not on the same subject matter 9 we think that the lower courts were wrong in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 1941 (PC)

K.U. Kulkarni Vs. Ganpat Hiraji Tell

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-1941

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR264

labourer within the meaning of section 60 h of the code if he does or is expected to do that class parts of same clause under section 60 h of the civil procedure code 1908 a person can be regarded as a 265 referred to under section 60 h of the civil procedure code 1908 the entire wages of labourers and domestic servants respondent no 1 only civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 60 h head jobber in textile mill work of in a different sense the court must follow the general rule that special expressions take from things general where there are london general omnibus co 1884 53 l j q b 352 smith v associated omnibus company 1907 1 k b 916 labour smith v associated omnibus company 1907 1 k b 916 the doing of manual work would not necessarily be a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 1941 (PC)

Chandrakant Devji Vs. Narottamdas Amarchand

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-1941

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR644

must be determined by a reference to the civil procedure code at the moment when this appeal was filed it was that question must be determined by a reference to the civil procedure code at the moment when this appeal was filed question must be determined by a reference to the civil procedure code at the moment when this appeal was filed it the appeal under order xxii rule 8 civil procedure code 1908 contending that by reason of the insolvency of the appellant the ordinary deposit of rs 500 under the high court rules it is said that he has got no money that rule 8 is made applicable to appeals by rule 11 3 now the only question to my mind on this motion in the case of state v millind reported in 2001 91 mah lj sc 1 is not the law declared by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1941 (PC)

Jamiyatram Gaurishankar Joshi Vs. Umiyashankar Pranshankar Joshi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-1941

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR699

expression the same judgment debtor in section 73 civil procedure code 1908 denotes identity of individuality and identity of character or execution which raises a question under section 73 of the civil procedure code 1908 there were two decrees the first being debtor within the meaning of section 73 of the civil procedure code 1808 so as to entitle the holders of the j 8 i agree civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 73 rateable distribution same judgment debtor meaning of decree granted by high court even in cases relating to admissions 3 when there is a conflict of authority upon a question chettiar v viswanathan chettiar 1935 i l r 59 mad 93 f b we are not concerned with that question and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1941 (PC)

Dattatraya Kashinath Chhatre Vs. Vithaldas Bhagwandas Darbar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1941

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR1022

..... 9 in my opinion there is no substance in the appeal and it must be dismissed with costs 10 rule in civil application no 239 discharged with cost civil procedure code act v of 1908 order xxi rule ..... of decree by decree holder whether permissible in order xxi rule 2 sub rule 3 of the civil procedure code 1908 the ..... xxi rule 2 1 of the civil procedure code is bound under order xxxii rule 7 of the code to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 1941 (PC)

Gajanan Laxman Limaye Vs. Bhalchandra Keshav Limaye

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-1941

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR88

..... 14 section 92 1 of the code of civil procedure provides that in the case of ..... under section 92 of the civil procedure code 1908 was not obtained for the institution of the ..... to out weigh the ordinary rule that a man who brings a suit in ..... not under section 92 of the civil procedure code 9 in paragraph 4 it is admitted ..... settlement and may be shortly stated 3 one bapu narayan limaye settled all .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //