Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 Court: delhi Page 20 of about 43,990 results (0.102 seconds)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. S.V. Nagarajan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT406

..... encouraged by the aforesaid act of the petitioner, the respondent filed oa no. .....

Dr. Sat Pal Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998(46)DRJ705

..... , can the respondents be not directed to compensate the petitioners, who were small cultivators holding lands within the ceiling limit in and around delhi, for the injury caused to them, not by the provisions of the act, but because of the non-exercise of the power by the authorities under the act within a reasonable time?'15. ..... kaul, the mcd had acted contrary to the note in the recruitment regulations for medical & public health post in mcd, and according to the learned counsel, the regulations being statutory, the mcd, when the matter is governed by a statutory regulation, cannot .....

Sh. Raghubir Singh (Retd) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 138(2007)DLT467

..... limited scope of judicial review of the merits of a selection made for appointment to a service or a civil post, the tribunal has rightly proceeded on the basis that it is not expected to play the role of an appellate authority or an umpire in the acts and proceedings of the dpc and that it could not sit in judgment over the selection made by the dpc unless the selection is assailed as being vitiated by mala fides or on the ground of it being arbitrary. ..... a departmental promotion committee is expected to act with due application of mind by taking into account, and applying the law of the land. .....

Shri G.B. Sharma Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... defence of the defendants was that the plaintiff was considered four times for promotion; his acr for the year 1978 had been sent back for reconsideration but even after reconsideration, the qualifying marks were 300 but the total marks of the acrs for the years 1978 & 1979 of the plaintiff worked out only to 281 marks; he would not have granted promotion for the ..... a bare perusal of the record reveals that no prejudice has been caused to the plaintiff though the acr of the year 1978 was submitted late because even if the same would have been considered by the defendants, the plaintiff was not in a position to make the minimum grade required for the ..... , the perusal of the records reveals that if the acr for the year 1978 is considered for the post of promotion, the appellant would have been awarded ..... the perusal of the record reveals that if the acr for the year 1978 is considered for the post of promotion the plaintiff would have been awarded ..... 16.06.1980 as a warrant officer; his acr for the year 1978-79 had to be considered but his acr for the year 1978 had been sent back for reconsideration and was never before the competent authority at the time when he was considered for promotion; his promotion has been illegally ..... even after reconsideration of acr for the year 1978, the marks of the defendant worked out to 281; qualifying marks were 300 for promotion; no prejudice has been suffered by the appellant ..... there is nothing on record to suggest that act of year 1977 is illegal. .....

Tulsi Ram Arya Vs. the Chairman Delhi Transco Limited and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... mr sethi, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of bses yamuna power limited contended that rule 9(1) of the ccs (pension) rules cannot be interpreted to be applicable only in those cases where the act of misconduct or negligence on the part of the erstwhile employee results in a pecuniary loss to the government. ..... coram:honble mr justice badar durrez ahmed, acting chief justice honble mr justice vibhu bakhru judgment vibhu bakhru, j 1.these cross appeals are directed against the judgment dated 31.01.2013 passed by a learned single judge of this court in w.p.(c) no. ..... sections 3 & 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 was registered against the writ petitioner. ..... - for the purposes of this rule, 'dowry' has the same meaning as in the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961)."10. .....

Bses Yamuna Power Limited Vs. Tulsi Ram Arya and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... mr sethi, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of bses yamuna power limited contended that rule 9(1) of the ccs (pension) rules cannot be interpreted to be applicable only in those cases where the act of misconduct or negligence on the part of the erstwhile employee results in a pecuniary loss to the government. ..... coram:honble mr justice badar durrez ahmed, acting chief justice honble mr justice vibhu bakhru judgment vibhu bakhru, j 1.these cross appeals are directed against the judgment dated 31.01.2013 passed by a learned single judge of this court in w.p.(c) no. ..... sections 3 & 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 was registered against the writ petitioner. ..... - for the purposes of this rule, 'dowry' has the same meaning as in the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961)."10. .....

Vijay Ram Srivastava, Haryana Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... tte/dee/n.rly failed to maintain absolute integrity, exhibited lack of devotion on duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a railway servant, thereby contravened rule no.3.1(i)(ii) and (iii) of railway services (conduct) rules, 1966. ..... by the above acts of omission and commission shri vijay ram srivastava hd. ..... gravity of misconduct particularly, because he was not involved in active collusion with the other employees of the company who were involved in this incident, for causing financial loss to the respondent-company but was negligent by an act of omission. .....

Mukesh Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... to threaten the wife, beat her up and ultimately burn her to death for issues as despicable as dowry or while acting under the influence of alcohol appears to have become a practice especially common in certain families with a poor economic and educational background. ..... the court, however has to always be on guard to see that the statement of the deceased was not as a result of either tutoring or promoting or a product of imagination. ..... the court has to be on guard that the statement of deceased was not as a result of either tutoring or prompting or a product of imagination. ..... the court is also to be on guard that the statement of the deceased was not a result of either tutoring, prompting or a product of imagination. ..... (iv) where dying declaration is suspicious it should not be acted upon without corroborative evidence. ..... state of gujarat reported in air1992sc1817 the same are reproduced as under: (i) there is neither rule of law nor of prudence that dying declaration cannot be acted upon without corroboration. ..... to meet this, stringent measures were brought in the indian penal code and the evidence act through amendments. ..... there have been series of legislations in this regard, without much effect this led to the passing of dowry prohibition act in 1961. ..... (x) where the prosecution version differs from the version as given in the dying declaration, the said declaration cannot be acted upon. .....

Ravindra Kumar Sood and Another Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

..... in fact, the ntpc cda rules, 1977 provide the examining of the case by the reviewing authority and the said reviewing authority has to be act under rule 33 of the rules and he is thus within his powers to impose penalty and differ with the decision of the disciplinary authority in the matter and this is in continuation of the proceedings initiated on the charge-sheet ..... and whereas the charges have been proved are of very serious nature involving disturbance and disruption of an official function, disorderly and indecent behavior within the premises of the company, acts subversive of discipline and abetment thereof, the disciplinary authority seems to have failed to appreciate the gravity of these charges. 05. ..... engineer and due to unlawful and malafide acts respondents fail to consider petitioner in interview in dpc-93. ..... d) the contention advanced by mr.sood that act of ntpc of imposing minor penalty and withholding of punishment has resulted in double jeopardy to mr.sood as mr.sood has been punished twice for same misconduct is misplaced for the reason unless the period of punishment gets expired by ..... the respondents by their acts of omission and commissions have kept the unlawful penalty imposed on the petitioner in-spite of the quashing of the charge sheet and penalty in the year 1986. ? 33. ..... by the above acts, he committed misconduct under rule 5(5), 5(10), 5(12), 5(20) and 5(21). ? 7. ..... by the above act, shri sood has committed misconduct under rule 5(5), 5(12), 5(20) and 5(21) .....

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs.sh. Satnam Singh and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... that in response to the information sought by them under the rti act, 2005 vide letters dated 02.08.2014 ad 12.11.2014, they were informed that the recoveries made from their gratuity were shown in their last payment certificates, which was as per the pay fixed in their service .....