Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 Court: delhi Page 18 of about 43,990 results (0.299 seconds)

Panther Detective Services Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)8STT215

..... the contention in relation to valuation is that appellant was charging separately for the wage of the security guard, pf, esi payment and service charge and service tax payable. ..... submission of the learned counsel is that appellant was under bona fide belief that the value of service rendered was 'service charge' only and that the wages of the guard and supervisor were not includible. ..... coming to the penalty amounts, the contention of the learned counsel is that in terms of section 80 of the finance act, 1994, no penalty is warranted on the appellants. ..... the appellant was also charging the recipient of the security service for the cost of security guard as well as pf, esi payments. ..... in such a system, the wage of the security guard is the basic cost. ..... in the present case, security is provided through manual guard. .....

Smt. Meena Kumari D/O Prem Chand Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Throug ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... meena kumari, a trained graduate teacher (tgt) drawing, belonging to reserved category of scheduled caste, the applicant herein, through present application filed by her under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, makes a serious complaint of her being overlooked by her junior in the matter of promotion to the post of post graduate teacher (pgt) drawing vide order dated 13.4.2005. .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Bharat Bhushan and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT158; 2008(101)DRJ313; 2008(3)SLJ53(Delhi)

..... it is the issuance of these orders with which the respondents herein felt aggrieved and filed oa before the tribunal under section 19 of the central administrative tribunal act. .....

Ramesh Sagar, New Delhi Vs. Chief Secretary Govt of Nct of Delhi, Delh ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... thus, the act on the part of both the charged officials is not only a mere negligence but it is deliberate and collusive. .....

Suresh Chand Meena Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Cu ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... dharam paul sharma, member (j) the applicant, a senior horticultural assistant in the office of respondent-archaeological survey of india and posted in chittorgarh, rajasthan has filed this application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, seeking the following reliefs:- i) to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 20.10.2009 (annexure a-1), seniority list dated 11.11.2009 (annexure a-1/a) and the order dated 16.2.2010 (annexure a-2) and direct the official ..... however, respondent no.4 has obtained material information in this regard under rti act, a copy of which is placed at annexure x-2 (colly)to the reply of respondent no.4. ..... in other words, if the act under challenge is not ultravires the power of the authority concerned, its validity can not be assailed merely with reference to the label under which or the manner in which, it has been done. .....

Kuldeep Singh Vs. Union of India and Others Through the General Manage ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... feeling aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents, the applicant has come to this tribunal under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 with the following reliefs:- 8.1 that this honble tribunal may graciously be pleased to allow this "riginal application and quash the impugned order dated 17.05.2010 with all consequential benefits. ..... reasons advanced by shri dhawan against the interest do not convince as i find that only after the applicant filed this oa on 01.02.2011 the respondents have acted to get the clearance which was received on 16.05.2011 and the cheque dated 13.09.2011 was issued to the applicant. ..... he came to know that in this regard he had been given clearance as he got the information through right to information act and the said stock sheet dated 23.09.1999 was not pending on account of the applicant. .....

Manjeet Singh Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... pw22 categorically deposed as to how deceased subhash tiwari was sitting on the chair, when the appellant entered the showroom with the gun belonging to night guard sri pal pointed the gun at him and opened fire. ..... other words, if the court is convinced that the testimony of a witness to the occurrence is true the court is free to act on it albeit the investigating officer's suspicious role in the case.33. ..... along with manjeet singh and subhash tiwari, a guard of wsp company and vikas entered the office . ..... sripal was the right guard on duty at the showroom, manjit singh brought the gun of the night guard accused sripal from outside and pointed the gun towards subash tiwari and gave the shot at the above ..... i, one subash tiwari, who was working as a guard in wsf company, manjit singh came inside the showroom, i started changing my ..... posting in neighbouring office of wsp as a security guard was not challenged in cross-examination. ..... manjeet singh, a security guard of showroom, came there within few minutes and opened the ..... was guard there. ..... the gun did not belong to the appellant as it belonged to the security guard sripal. ..... argument, the learned counsel argues that the prosecution has preferred not to examine the owner of the showroom as to how and why the keys of the showroom were kept with the guard. ..... pw22s testimony, by itself, is sufficient to indict the appellant that he fired a shot from the gun belonging to his co-accused sri pal who was also prosecuted under section 30 of the arms act.12. .....

Smt. Vibha Vs. Sh. Rama Nand

Court : Delhi

..... it is submitted that even though the larger relief of custodial rights was claimed, the guardianship court acted well within the limits of its jurisdiction to restrict the relief to visitation rights only. ..... concededly, vibha had exclusive custody of lakshay till the grandfather initiated the present proceedings under sections 7, 8 and 25 of the guardianship and wards act, 1890 on 6th january, 2005. .....

Vikas Aggarwal, Haryana Vs. Union of India Through Through General Man ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... he filed an appeal immediately thereafter as also an application under rti act, 2005 on 24.12.2007 by which he was informed that copy of dpc cannot be provided to him. .....

Vaishnav Transformer vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the relevant terms and condition of the rfe, read as under:-" 1.0 power grid corporation of india limited (a government of india enterprise) incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its registered office at b- ===================================================================== wp(c) 1672/2016 & wp(c) 1950/2016 page 4 of 18 to empanel 9, qutab institutional area, katwaria sarai, new delhi - 110 016 (hereinafter referred to as 'powergrid') have been entrusted for procurement of various equipments/ .....