Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: chennai Page 2 of about 171 results (0.109 seconds)

The Corporation of Madras Represented by the Commissioner Vs. R. Sunda ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1971)2MLJ365

..... , which is the corporation of madras, to apply for sanction of the state government as provided for in section 102, proviso (a) of the madras city municipal corporation act, 1919, for exemption of the whole of water and drainage tax and the lighting tax in the west mambalam area. the first respondent is a landlord residing in west ..... the city and therefore the demand of property tax in full was not illegal. kailasam, j., on a consideration of the relative sections in the madras city municipal corporation act, was of opinion that the corporation was in law bound to apply to the state government for exemption from payment of the whole of the water and drainage tax. ..... granted and if so the state government should be approached for their consent. strong reliance is placed on proviso (a) to section 102 of the madras city municipal corporation act and it is urged that the proviso makes it explicit that, when a particular area is not served with water or drainage system, it is the duty of the .....

S. Rajesh Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem and Others

Court : Chennai

..... wrong, as there was no permission granted to him even to participate. all coast guard personnel are governed by the coast guard act, 1978 and the rules framed thereunder. as per section 9 of the coast guard act, 1978, resignation is not a matter of right. the coast guard is a specialized one, imparting intensive training to the officers in order to ..... safeguard the coastal line and due to huge requirement in the coast guard, such a person ..... the 3rd respondent herein. the 3rd respondent citing the circular dated 7.4.2006, has stated that the petitioner could not be relieved from the coast guard to participate in the selection process and hence, rejected the application of the petitioner as early as on 6.4.2015. thereafter, the petitioner had .....

The Management, Vs. 1.The Appellate Tribunal,

Court : Chennai

..... 6,198/-, it should be taken as rs.6,935/-.10. i have considered this submission.11. in my considered opinion, the authority under the payment of gratuity act, 1972 is not competent to decide the correctness of the wages. reducing of wages and benefits, which may amount to unfair labour practices, against which the remedy ..... he would therefore submit that this ground should be rejected.6. i have considered this submission.7. as per section 1(3)(b) of the payment of gratuity act, 1972, it is an essential requirement that there should have been ten or more persons working in the establishment or were employed on any day of the preceding ..... 2nd respondent : mr.s.chandrasekar government advocate for 3rd respondent : mr.k.s.vamsidhar :order the petitioner is a cooperative society governed by the tamil nadu cooperative societies act. the third respondent was employed under the petitioner. the third respondent retired from service on 31.03.2006. but his gratuity on retirement under section 4 of the .....

Triplicane Permanent Fund Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Anot ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1989)78CTR(Mad)173; [1989]179ITR492(Mad); [1989]45TAXMAN15(Mad)

..... would be allowable on general principles under section 28 itself. the allahabad high court in the case of swadeshi cotton mills co. ltd. v. ito : [1978]112itr1038(all) held that contribution towards gratuity is permissible business expenditure. the contention of the department that the payment of gratuity is provided for in clause (v) ..... as deduction in the various assessment years up to and inclusive of the assessment year 1974-75.consequent on the promulgation of the payment of gratuity act, 1972 (central act 39 of 1972), with effect from september 16, 1972, the petitioner was obliged to recompute the amount available in the gratuity fund on the ..... act, 1972, arose on september 16, 1972, relevant for the assessment year 1973-74 and hence the liability cannot be allowed in the assessment years under consideration. for this purpose, the first respondent relied on the decisions of the kerala high court in l. j. patel and co. v. cit : [1974]97itr152(ker) and cit v. kerala nut food co. [1978 .....

A. Padmanabhan Vs. Joint Commissioner of Labour, (Appellate Authority ...

Court : Chennai

..... impeccable and timely compliance. the law entitles an employee to the benefits which he must receive from the employer unless restricted. the payment of gratuity act is a welfare legislation to provide a scheme for payment of gratuity to all types of employees engaged in the establishments employing ten or more employees. ..... if parties intend such wrong, as where they conspire against the public interests by agreeing to violate the law or some rule of public policy, the act doubtless involves moral turpitude. when no wrong is contemplated, but is unintentionally committed, through error of judgment, it is otherwise.the american encyclopaedia of law ..... controlling authority, which was dismissed. a further appeal was also filed by the petitioner before the joint commissioner of labour, the appellate authority under the act, and the same was also dismissed. the reason adduced by the respondent-company, which was subsequently confirmed by the controlling authority and the appellate authority .....

K.Solomon, Vs. the Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Court : Chennai

..... for collateral purpose. the respondent failed to give reasons as to why it had to be dispensed with. (c) the offence under section 7 of the prevention of corruption act cannot be considered as affecting the security of the state.(d) the respondent has no jurisdiction to exercise the powers vested under clause (c) of the second proviso to ..... city-i, detachment, chennai-28. based on this complaint, vigilance and anti-corruption, chennai city-i, detachment registered case in crime no.11/2008 u/s prevention of corruption act 1988 on 01.08.2008 against thiru.k.solomon, grade ii warder, central prison ii, puzhal. a trap was organised and in the trap thiru.k.solomon, grade ii ..... confined in puzhal central prison. in this connection, a case in vigilance and anti-corruption, chennai city- i cr.no.11/08, u/s.7 of prevention of corruption act, 1988 was registered on 1.8.2008 against thiru.k.solomon, grade ii warder, central prison-ii, puzhal, chennai.66. 3] a trap was organized by thiru.s.amalraj .....

Binny Limited Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Labour and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... even after termination, who would refuse to pay the damages for the unlawful occupation of the quarters, and who demands the statutory dues under the provisions of the act, can be granted equitable relief by this court under article 226 of the constitution of india.16. under such circumstances, to meet the ends of justice, ..... retirement dues, and held as follows: "3. ..... admittedly, the gratuity amount has been deposited by the company with the appropriate authority or the appellate authority under the act wherefrom the same will be recovered by the employee. in the judgment reported in 2001 (3) lln 822, wazir chand v. union of india and ors., the ..... the supreme court while deciding about the oil and natural gas commission (death, retirement and terminal gratuity) regulations, 1969 in the light of the payment of gratuity act, 1972, has explained the extent of the equitable jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution of india. while holding that under article 226 of the .....

Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...

Court : Chennai

..... central electricity regulatory commission, the first respondent herein, has issued the impugned regulations, after having followed all the necessary procedures prescribed by the electricity act, 2003. 76. it is also seen, from the records available, that the petitioner corporation had been given sufficient opportunity to raise its objections, ..... commission has imposed certain stringent conditions, which would increase the cost of electricity supplied to the consumers. as per section 25 of the electricity act, 2003, the central government may take necessary steps for intra-state, regional and inter-regional transmission of electricity. however, the impugned amendments ..... interchange charges and related matters) (second amendment) regulations, 2012. the impugned regulations have been validly made, in accordance with the provisions of the act, in due discharge of the statutory responsibility vested in the central commission. 31. it has been further submitted that the impugned regulations, which .....

K.S. Mahalingam Mudali Vs. The State Express Transport Corporation Ltd ...

Court : Chennai

..... no authority in support thereof .................." 9. the statutory rules providing for payment of interest is under rule 45-a of the tamil nadu pension rules, 1978 and section 8 of the payment of gratuity act and those reference are extracted for easy reference. [(1) interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum shall be payable on the death ..... a government servant otherwise than on superannuation under fundamental rule 56(2) or 56(3) or rules 33, 36, 38, 39 and 42 of the tamil nadu pension rules, 1978; (iii) six months from the date of death of a government servant while in service and where the delay is not caused on account of more than one claimant; ..... the specified period. 2. this notification shall come into force on the date of its publication in the official gazette." 11. section 8 of the payment of gratuity act, 1972, enables payment of interest in case of delayed payment subject to the condition that such interest shall not be more than the gratuity amount. the said section is .....

Shaikh Ismail Sahib Vs. Nirchinda Venkatanarasimhulu Iyah

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1936Mad905; 165Ind.Cas.180; (1936)71MLJ400

..... a.m. i am of opinion that the learned trial judge was wrong in coming to the conclusion that the plaintiff had not established an actionable nuisance. the acts complained of have been fully proved and they certainly amount to an actionable nuisance, and the only remedy in such a case is to grant an injunction. the ..... by him, and in deciding whether, in any particular case, his right has been interfered with and a nuisance thereby caused, it is necessary to determine whether the act complained of is an inconvenience materially interfering with the ordinary physical comfort of human existence, not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but ..... defendant's main contest was that there was no actionable nuisance as a result of the noise and the only, point decided by the trial court was whether the act complained of, that is, the production of loud music and noise in connection with ceremonies and pujas carried on in the defendant's house, amounts to an actionable .....