Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: chennai Page 1 of about 171 results (0.214 seconds)

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

..... fault diagnosis thereby committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.d. showed total irresponsible and careless attitude in fault diagnosis and repair of defects affecting the ship's operational efficiency and delay in repair process ..... committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.c. grossly derelicted his duty by allowing the damage to get compounded on port d.a in overheated condition over a long period without proper ..... board d.a after ingress of sea water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard d.a thereby committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.b. knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board d.a from his commanding officer, administrative authority and repair agency thereby .....

The Special Officer Vs. the Joint Commissioner of Labour

Court : Chennai

..... in case there is an ascertainable loss caused to the society. the petitioner-society did not proceed against the workman with a vast power conferred under the act. after the workman had approached the authority, the petitioner-society cannot raise such issues and contend that the workman was not eligible for any gratuity. even after ..... 01.2011. the appellate authority dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner-society, challenging an order passed by the second respondent (controlling authority under the payment of gratuity act), assistant commissioner of labour, trichy, made in p.g.no.1/2009. aggrieved by the order passed by the appellate authority, the writ petition came to be ..... over the rules framed by the coal india limited, holding company of respondent 1, known as the coal india executives' conduct, discipline and appeal rules, 1978 (for short the rules). indisputably, the appellant was governed by the rules. rule 27 provides for the nature of penalties including recovery from pay or .....

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madurai Vs. S. Gnanaprakasam and ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... allowance had been mentioned. the appellant did not dispute the fact that the deceased was working as coast guard deputy commanding officer and ex.p.10 was not genuine. no contra evidence was let in by the appellant. therefore, the monthly income ..... c.p.c.? (ii) whether the rate of interest awarded is excessive? 8. at the time of death, the deceased was working as coast guard deputy commanding officer. the respondents 1 to 4/claimants have produced ex.p.10 service register, wherein, the income of the deceased and dearness ..... register. therefore, the tribunal ought to have fixed only notional income described under schedule ii to section 163-a of motor vehicles (amendment) act. the quantum of compensation and rate of interest is excessive. 5. per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 4 contended ..... (prayer: appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.01.2005 passed in m.c.o.p .....

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

..... law officer, the 3rd respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the coast guard act, 1978. the judicial proceedings were conducted by the chief law officer on 9th september, 2002 at the coast guard headquarters in the presence of the petitioner along with dig ts balasubramaniam, who was the defending officer and commandant nautiyal, who was ..... . subsequently, the petitioner has participated in the trial. further more, as contended by the learned counsel for the respondents, the series of acts covering the period from july 1999 to june 2000 under section 34(f) of the coast guard act, 1978, were framed as one charge. therefore, i do not find any merit in the submission made by the learned senior counsel for the .....

Nallamadan S. (D) by Anandammal L.R. Vs. Administrative Officer, Town ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ726Mad; (2000)1MLJ554

..... second respondent to have not awarded the interest, which is violative of article 14 of the constitution of india and the relevant provisions of the payment of gratuity act and with the above contentions, the petitioner would pray for the relief sought for as stated supra. 3. during arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the ..... decisions of the apex court and that of various other high courts declaring that the local bodies were liable to pay gratuity under the payment of gratuity act and that no separate government order was required for that purpose and the second respondent allowed the appeal and directed the first respondent to pay the gratuity ..... gratuity was payable to him; that he made an application dated september 20, 1990 to the controlling authority under section 7(4) of the payment of gratuity act seeking gratuity along with interest for the belated payment, but the controlling authority dismissed the said application by his order dated february 21, 1991 on ground that .....

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

..... the appellant and purolator india ltd., no objection was raised by the appellant. no doubt in april, 1978 the appellant gave notice to the telegraph authority under sections 17 and 19-a of the act and may be that the telephone connections in may, 1978 can be treated as the ones objected to but then sections 17 and 19-a have a different ..... purport. the resistance and obstruction envisaged by section 16(1) of the act is different. this will be clear on a reading of ..... sub-section (1) of section 16 of the act. it is for the purpose of .....

Murugan Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

..... tribes is resented and more often these people become victims of attacks by the vested interests.[objects and reasons - sc and st (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989]11.when the pernicious practice of untouchability never ceased, m.katju,j., after recalling the equality principle incorporated in the americanl declaration of independence ..... drinks to scheduled caste persons and non-scheduled caste persons. in our opinion, this is highly objectionable, and is an offence under the sc/st act, and hence those practising it must be criminally proceeded against and given harsh punishment if found guilty. all administrative and police officers will be accountable ..... seeking for a direction to the respondent state to take precautionary measures under the provisions of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 in uthapuram and other vulnerable areas and also to provide adequate compensation to the affected scheduled caste people.court steps in :-19.the said .....

G.Sarala Vs. the Home Secretary

Court : Chennai

..... holding and smuggling of arms and ammunition are not sufficient to place them under fetters and ropes while lodged in a closed ward of the hospital as patients. security guards were posted outside the ward. it is not disputed that while in jail the detenues were not handcuffed. they cannot be in a worst condition while in hospital ..... than is necessary to prevent him from escaping. viewed in the light of the law laid down by this court in sunil batra v. delhi administration and others [1978 (4) scc494 that a person in custody is not wholly denuded of his fundamental rights, the limitations following from that principle acquire a profound significance. the power to ..... 'dharna' for public cause and voluntarily submitted them- selves for arrest and who had no tendency to escape had been subjected to humiliation by being handcuffed which act of the escort party is against all norms of decency and which is in utter violation of the principle underlying article 21 of the constitution of india. so .....

Abdul Nazeer Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3318

..... which is an increasing menace in the current international sphere, and keeping that in mind the legislature thought it fit of providing stringent punishment by amending the original act in the year 1989. therefore, if section 167(2) provides bail to an accused for the default or for the inability of the investigating agency, and taken ..... substances. that being the underlying object and particularly when the provisions of section 37 of n.d.p.s. act are in negative terms limiting the scope of the applicability of the provisions of cr.p.c. regarding bail, it cannot be said that the high court' ..... procedure, 1973 no person accused of an offence prescribed therein shall be released on bail unless the conditions contained therein were satisfied. the n.d.p.s. act is a special enactment and it was enacted with a view to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic .....

General Manager, Eid Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)ILLJ757Mad

..... in a particular case that the principles of resjudicata are attracted.18. in the workmen of cochin port trust v. the board of trustees, : (1978)iillj161sc the principle of constructive resjudicata is also held to apply. reliance is placed on the following passage by learned counsel for the respondents:'the rule of ..... supreme court dismissed the application expressing disinclination to exercise the jurisdiction, as the applicants had already moved the labour court under section 33c of the industrial disputes act (present proceedings), and those matters were at an advanced stage. it is, therefore, submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the supreme court never ..... . there was a settlement of disputes between the management and workers in 1956 which contained provisions for gratuity and retiring allowances. the payment of gratuity act came into force on september 16, 1972. the appellant took the stand that thereafter the employees were not entitled to retirement allowances under g.o.o .....