Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines taking over of management act 1973 section 6 power of central government to appoint custodian Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 884 results (0.241 seconds)

Bira Kishore Naik Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC2123; 1986LabIC1944; (1986)IILLJ139SC; 1986(1)SCALE1300; (1986)3SCC338; [1986]2SCR1044; 1986(2)LC293(SC)

..... that it would not be appropriate either to nationalise these unauthorisedly worked mines after taking them over under the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 or to get the concerned mining leases prematurely terminated and regranted to government companies under the mining and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957. in order to achieve this purpose the coal mines (nationalisation) amendment ordinance was promulgated on april 29, 1976 providing that ..... employees of the central government or of the government company.3. the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 was enacted to provide for the taking over of the management of coal mines, 'pending nationalisation of such mines with a view to ensuring rational and co-ordinated development of coal production and for promoting optimum utilisation of the coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country, and for .....

New Chhatabar Coal Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. J.G. Kumarmangalam and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1974Cal242

..... annexture 'b' to the petition. the said publication is set out hereunder :--'coal mines authority,government of india, ministry of steel & mines, dept. of mines,6, lyons range, calcutta-1. notice to all customers of coal mines as notified in schedule to the coal mines (taking over of management) ordinance, 1973, published in the gazette of india. dated ..... 1) of the constitution of india promulgated an ordinance known as the coal mines (taking over of management) ordinance, 1973 (referred to as 'the said ordinance' hereinafter) for the purpose of taking over the management of coal mines containing coal pending the nationalisation of the said mines. the said ordinance came into effect on january 31, 1973. in ..... been made for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to forbear from giving any effect to the coal mines (taking over of management) ordinance, 1973, in relation to the chhatabar colliery of the petitioner situated in mouza chhatabar. p.s. nirsha in the .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Payments and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1986Cal236

..... was managed by the central government 'shall be recovered from the income derived from the transactions which took place at any time after the commencement of the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 but before the appointed day notwithstanding that such income was derived after the appointed day'.6. in this case, the petitioners ..... in the central government, shall be recovered from the income derived from the transactions which took place at any time after the commencement of the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973, but before the appointed day notwithstanding that such income was derived after the appointed day :provided that where such ..... the central government (section 18(2)). this provision became necessary in view of the fact that prior to nationalisation, the management of the coal mines had been taken over by the central government on and from 30th january, 1973. under the nationalisation act, the central government or the government company was required to .....

Dejapada Das and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC2031; (1980)3SCC412; [1980]3SCR586; 1980(12)LC691(SC)

..... follows that on any view of the matter the managements other than those specified under section 3(3) of the 1976 act can claim to extract coal from any coal mines. if this conclusion is sound, ..... 5, it is impossible to postulate 'deemed custodianship'. there are scheduled mines or notified mines, under the scheme of statutory management in the management take-over act. notifications are a sine qua non for custodian-ship, actual or deemed and absent such notification taking over management no private agency can self-style itself as deemed custodian. it ..... appointed so that a legal colour is imparted to lawless depradations.5. it is true that nationalisation of coal, as a policy, has been evolved over the seventies. in the beginning, the management of coal mines was taken over and at a later stage ownership itself vested in the union of india by virtue of ownership of .....

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... covers all relevant aspects of prison management, viz. security, safety, scientific & technological interventions, segregation of prisoners, special provision for women inmates, taking appropriate action against criminal activities of prisoners in the prison, grant of parole and furlough to prisoners, their education, vocational training and skill development, ..... entirely opposed to substantive equality, as it contributes to institutional discrimination, depriving inmates of an opportunity to reform, at par with the others over whom the pall of caste does not hang. 187 article 21 envisages the growth of individual personality. caste prejudices and discrimination hinder the ..... educational institutions, and public sector offices as well as the private sector working spaces, which were projected to be secular and privilege class over caste, and the various socio-economic and political institutions that interface with everyday lived experiences. 39 the fight against caste-based discrimination .....

M/s. Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to be undertaken, which included obtaining approvals from different government agencies and establishment of a plant. none of that could take place as an order was passed by this court in the year 2014, deallocating all captive coal mines. page 100 of 101 criminal appeal no.1659-1660 of 2024 21.3 in the light of the aforesaid discussion ..... agreement executed between the parties vide judgment dated 22nd july, 2021, the karnataka high court clearly observed that kpcl did not have any claim over the coal rejects generated during washing of the coal. the submissions made by the respondent cbi that the aforesaid judgment page 97 of 101 criminal appeal no.1659-1660 of 2024 came much ..... powers under article 136 in the following words: 4. article 136 of the constitution of india invests the supreme court with a plentitude of plenary, appellate power over all courts and tribunals in india. the power is plenary in the sense that there are no words in article 136 itself qualifying that power. but, the .....

Anwarbhashasab S/o. Mardansab Saragi Vs. The Divisional Controller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... that, the enquiry report was served on the petitioner on 04.12.2013 and he has not given any reply to the same.10. the respondent corporation has thereafter taking into consideration of the previous record of he remaining absent and the punishment imposed thereon, has proceeded to pass the order dismissing the petitioner from service.11. the petitioner ..... of the enquiry. but, nothing in law prevents the punishing 1 (2015) 8 scc272- 20 - nc:2024. khc-d:10641 wp no.104702 of 2023 authority from taking that fact into consideration during the second stage of the enquiry, for essentially it relates more to the domain of punishment rather than to that of guilt. but what is ..... same to be illegal and improper, has however upheld the enquiry to be fair and proper. this, in the considered view of this court is unsustainable.19. in the over all, fact situation of the matter, this court is of the considered view that, the labour court by not adverting to the aforesaid material aspects of the matter has .....

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... up before a constitution bench of this court in burrakur coal co. ltd. v. union of india387 in the context of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act 1957.388 the coal bearing areas act was enacted by parliament to establish public control over the coal mining industry and its development by providing for the acquisition by ..... of list ii. as regards the latter, the language of entry 50 of list ii needs analysis for this purpose. we will take up the regulatory power of the states over mines and mineral development under entry 23 of list ii. entry 23 of list ii is expressly subject to the provisions of list ..... central government will ensure uniform regulatory standards for mineral operations, especially with respect to major minerals. moreover, it was envisaged that the central government could take effective steps to ensure uniform standards of exploration and extraction of minerals with a view to ensuring their sustainability and conservation. the phrase through a law .....

The General Manager, M/s Barsua Iron Ore Mines Vs. The Vice President ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... corporation established under section 3 of the employees' state insur- ance act, 1948 (34 of 1948), or the board of trustees constituted under section 3-a of the coal mines provid- ent fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 (46 of 1948), or the central board of trustees and the state boards of trustees constituted under section 5-a and ..... page 9 of 10 purported rectification/correction of date of birth to 12.03.1955. he would have to, necessarily, be content with his service and benefits accounted taking his date of birth as 27.12.1948.22. for reasons aforesaid, the appeal stands allowed. the award of the cgit dated 24.01.2018 and the impugned ..... any industrial establishment where such dispute first arose, the appropriate government shall be the central government or the state government, as the case may be, which has control over such industrial establishment. page 4 of 10 be said to be an inadvertent error or omission for the reason that had the so-called correct date of birth, .....

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... case may be done by the cbi, though he does not concede that the gujarat police is incompetent to investigate the matter. hence, we direct the cbi to take over further investigation of this case and report to this court from time to time. let a report be filed by the cbi within eight weeks. list after report is ..... was writ petition (crl.) no.491 of 2022 etc. page 79 of 251 applicable on the date of conviction. that after duly taking into account the fact that respondent no.3 had undergone over fifteen years of imprisonment and that no objections were received from the jail superintendent, godhra and that nine out of ten members of the ..... these conditions are found either in the jail manual or in statutory rules. it was pertinently observed that when an application for remission is made the appropriate government may take a decision on the remission application and pass orders granting remission subject to certain conditions or, refuse remission. but there has to be an application of mind on .....