Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 section 1 short title and commencement Sorted by: recent Page 9 of about 7,096 results (0.253 seconds)

Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal, a Society Registered Under the Societ ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR397; (2008)110BOMLR872; 2008(4)MhLj413

..... can be subjected to regulatory measures with a view to curb commercialisation of education, profiteering in it and exploitation of students. policing is permissible but not nationalisation or total takeover. while commenting upon these submissions and in order to maintain standards and excellence in professional education, the supreme court further stated that ..... and its availability at fair prices. the concept of fair prices to which section 3(1) of the madras essential articles control and requisitioning (temporary) powers act, 1949, expressly refers does not mean that the price once fixed must either remain stationary, or must be reduced in order to attract the power to ..... power to impose such a penalty, while according to the respondents, the directions of the supreme court that the samiti/committee shall be constituted to act as regulatory body for admission to these professional courses would ipso facto include the power to impose penalty in the event of default or non-compliance .....

Shio Nath Singh Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR481(Jhr)]

..... the petitioner is only sham and a paper transaction. the land in question had already been vested with bccl with effect from 1.5.1972 after enactment of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. since there is a claim by the petitioner-appellant, in order to verify his right, title, ownership and possession of the land in question, he was asked to ..... pointed out by the learned single judge, even according to the petitioner-appellant, the land in question, which belongs to him, has been acquired by the respondent-bccl for its mining purpose, whereas, according to the respondents, the petitioner is not the real owner, as he has not been able to establish his right, title, ownership and possession of the land .....

Custodian of Textile Undertaking Vs. Hall and Anderson Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)3CALLT530(HC),2008(4)CHN243

..... october, 1983. the ordinance was converted into the textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1983. subsequently, the nationalisation act of textile undertaking came into force known as the textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1995 which came into effect from 1st of april, 1994.4. the 1983 act had been promulgated in view of the steep fall in the volume of production of ..... plot and there was an attempt to show that it was not a workshop in, or adjacent to a mine. we are of the view that this hardly matters. merely because the land on which a workshop of a coal mine is located bears a different plot number, or even if there is a compound wall between the main ..... office of the coal mine and the workshop, it would not cease to be part of the mine. the question in such cases will always be whether the workshop is .....

Akanksha International Through Its Proprietor Mrs. Anju Suryaprakash D ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR611; 2007(5)BomCR481; (2007)109BOMLR1959; 2008(1)MhLj753

..... had executed a sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on 20.3.1972. the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 vesting in the central government right, title and interest of owners of coal mines specified in schedule, came into force on 1.5.1973. admittedly the appellant purchasers of property were the wives of the ..... its members. there is no change in the ownership in real sense.27. here we may refer to the case of subhra mukherjee and anr. v. bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. : air2000sc1203 . in that case, their lordships considered the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil. there was allegation of sham and collusive transaction by the ..... section only provides an expeditious way of recovery of bank loans/dues but no where states that such dues will be first charge on property under central act. both acts were enacted by competent legislations for different purposes and there is no conflict between the two. it is also held that the bank's right to recover .....

Bajrangi Rabidas Vs. Chairman, Managing Director, E.C.L. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN259,[2007(115)FLR590]

..... /writ petitioner in gas testing certificate under the mines act, 1952, sirdar's certificate under coal mines regulations, 1957 and also overman's certificate of service under coal mines regulations, 1957.2. the appellant/writ petitioner initially joined the services of the bengal coal co. ltd. at chinakuri mine no. ill on 9th january, 1970 as mining sirdar. after nationalisation of the coal mines, the said writ petitioner became an employee of ..... of birth was thereafter also mentioned in the identity card issued by the said bengal coal co. ltd. after the nationalisation of the coal mines, the appellant/writ petitioner became an employee of eastern coal fields ltd., a subsidiary of coal india limited as a taken over staff of the private coal company.4. according to the appellant, important excerpts from the service records of the said .....

Sujana Metal Products Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Panjagutta D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)

..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant-company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....

Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh Through Its President Vs. Empress Mills, ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR6; 2007(5)BomCR436; 2007(5)MhLj701

..... . in the application dated 25.10.991, the applicant - corporation (present respondent no. 1) averred as follows:2. that, under the provisions of nationalization act, the commissioner of payments has been appointed to decide the liability of the erstwhile management. that, about 7,000 employees of the erstwhile management have filed claims ..... with those and while dealing with the submissions raised by respondents, learned single judge held as follows:.this is also apparent from the fact that nationalization act no where prohibits a claimant from establishing his claim before the competent forum like civil court or labour court etc. there is no provision which requires ..... to commissioner of payment or for seeking any leave from commissioner of payment for their continuation. in these circumstances, it is apparent that the nationalization act itself permits a claimant to prosecute his remedy before appropriate forum. the said forum therefore has to follow the procedure which is evolved for it and .....

R (on the application of National Grid Gas plc (formerly Transco plc)) ...

Court : House of Lords

..... became operational in about 1915. in 1931 the banddgc was amalgamated with the syanddgc and the amalgamated company continued gas production at the bawtry site. the gas industry was nationalised by the gas act 1948 after which the site was owned and controlled by the emgb. however gas production at the site was discontinued shortly after ..... as is explained in para 30 of forbes j's judgment, it is not known exactly when the coal tar residues were buried at the site. it is probable that most of this happened when the site was in private ownership before nationalisation, but some part may have happened while the site was owned by the emgb. 11. section 17(1 ..... possibilities. one possibility is that the costs should be borne by the polluters, that is to say, by the companies that, in the process of turning coal into coal gas, produced the coal tar and buried it in the ground at the bawtry site. another possibility is that the cost should be borne by the present owners of the residences beneath .....

Bastacolla Colliery Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India a ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR544(Jhr)]

..... further pleadings of the contesting defendants was that the plaintiff-bank has filed his claim before the commissioner of payments in accordance with the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 and, therefore, the bank could not simultaneously resort to filing its claim by way of civil suit.4. on the basis of the rival pleadings ..... the court below on the ground that the learned court below had committed serious error of law in misconstruing and misreading the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act and that the learned court below had failed to frame relevant issue on the basis of the pleadings of the parties including the issue of question ..... of jurisdiction of the court in view of the provisions of the coal mines (nationalization) act, and further, that the trial court has committed error in recording its finding that the suit is not barred by the principle of res judicata .....

Srimati Sulochna Devi and ors. Vs. Coal India Limited and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2738; [2007(4)JCR116(Jhr)]

..... the ordinance and the act referred to hereinabove.11. coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 was enacted for taking over the management of the coal mines in the public interest pending nationalization of such mines. the act came into force with effect from 31th march, 1973. immediately thereafter coal mines nationalization act, 1973 was enacted which ..... appellate court recorded its finding on the following two issues.(i) whether durga bokapahari colliery vested in the central government as per section 3 of nationalisation act, 1973?(ii) whether durga bokapahari colliery was independent colliery and not part of badjna colliery?16. while deciding point no. (i) the appellate ..... court, after discussing the relevant provisions of the act, agreed will the finding of the trial court that durga bokapahari colliery vested in the central government no sooner the nationalisation act was passed. on point no. (ii) the appellate court held that bokapahari colliery was .....