Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 section 1 short title and commencement Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 233 results (0.247 seconds)

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

..... mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of the ..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of the .....

1.P.K.M.Selvam Vs. 1.State Through

Court : Chennai

..... mines and right in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of ..... proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by parliament such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of the .....

G.V. Films Ltd. Vs. S. Priyadarshan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]287ITR561(Mad)

..... subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 . in the said case, directors of a private coal mining company executing sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on march 20, 1972, and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, coming into force on ..... learned senior counsel for the auction purchasers has relied upon the decisions reported in parvinder singh v. renu gautam : air2004sc2299 , subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 , madras bangalore transport co. (west) v. inder singh : air1986sc1564 , cit v. sri meenakshi mills ltd. : [1967]63itr609( ..... profile of g. venkateswaran is given as under:particulars of employees as required under section 217(2a) of the companies act, 1956.___________________________________________________________________name age designation and nature grossrentuneration (years) of duties (rs.)___________________________________________________________________mr. g. venkateswaran 43 chairman and managing .....

National Textile Corporation Vs. Bank of Madura Ltd. and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1998]92CompCas659(Mad)

..... ., coimbatore, seeking for a writ of certiorari to call for and quash the proceedings of the commissioner of payments under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), in claim case no. cp/1/iv/sarada/77, dated september 4, 1982, and of the learned district judge of coimbatore, who is ..... 1981, which indisputably runs directly contrary to the provisions of the act. 22. sri sarada mill has been taken over under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974, and it is indisputably in sl. no. 98 of the first schedule to the act. section 21 of the act, which has been extracted above, provides the manner in which the ..... priority of claims have to be dealt with under the act, as per which category i will .....

Ashok Leyland Employees Union and Another Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC660

..... order passed by the central administrative tribunal.' in : [1983]1scr1000 (sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. m/s. bharat coking coal ltd.) in dealing with a challenge made to coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, it was held as hereunder :- '26. shri ashok sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf ..... of bharat coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalistion) act. but, ..... 1971)illj557sc (supra). in : (1994)illj197sc (bakshish singh v. darshan engg. works) while dealing with the provisions of payment of is gratuity act, the act was held to be a welfare measure introduced in the interest of general public to secure social and economic justice to workmen to assist them in .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]211ITR661(Mad)

..... of learned counsel for the revenue on the special circumstances of this case, namely, nationalisation of the head office and branches of the assessee-banking company in india, and in view of the ruling of the supreme court referred to by the tribunal, namely, guzdar kajora coal, mines ltd. v. cit : [1972]85itr599(sc) . 8. we derive support ..... assets in the malaysian branches, the appellate assistant commissioner was wrong in giving directions as mentioned above which go contrary to the terms of section 34 of the act. 4. it appears, before the tribunal, the assessee's counsel contended that the assessee had given particulars that the business was a composite one and the income ..... respect of the assets in those places were not available at the time of assessment. according to the income-tax officer, in terms of section 34 of the act, the depreciation can be allowed only if the prescribed particulars are furnished. on that account, the income-tax officer held that the assessee has not given the .....

C.V. Raman and ors. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas126(Mad); (1984)IILLJ34Mad

..... court, the learned judge held that two propositions would clearly emerge : (1) a statutory corporation, such as the banks, whose peculiar features can be gathered from the nationalisation act, can be taken to be owned by the central government or at any rate it would be an agency or instrumentality of the central government. (2) even if ..... of us. it was held there that the property belonging to a nationalised bank cannot be equated to the holdings of the government of india. 17. as to what is the meaning of a government company can be gathered from the ruling of the supreme court in western coal fields ltd. v. special area development authority, : [1982]2scr1 ..... . in the light of that case, certainly a nationalised bank is not a government company. 18. in a case which arose before the karnataka high court, which is .....

Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]52STC62(Mad)

..... dispute that even today burn & company is still existing. 9. the counsel for the petitioner also relies upon the decision in western coal fields ltd. v. sales tax officer [1977] 40 stc 225, wherein in respect of coal mines (nationlisation) act, under similar circumstances it has been held that the peremptory provisions found in section 28 therein, which corresponds to section 25 in this ..... government with effect from 19th december, 1973, by virtue of the burn company and indian standard wagon company (taking over of management) act, 1973. later, burn & co. was nationalised under act 97 of 1976 and by virtue of the provisions of that act, with effect from 1st april 1975, the undertaking, i.e., the assets only of burn & company ltd. and the right, title .....

K.A. Kannappa Chetti Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ212

..... have been taken away. they include in addition to the execution of the laws, the maintenance of public order, the management of grown property and nationalised industries and services, the direction of foreign policy, the conduct of military operations, and the provision or supervision of such services as education, public ..... . similarly, in purshottam gouindji havai v. shree b.m. desai, additional collector of bombay and ors. : 1956crilj129 where different land revenue recovery acts were prevalent in different states, the provisions of the one being stricter than the provisions in the other, the question arose whether article 14 is ..... 41. the next decision referred to was vedaranyeswara swami devasthanam v. state of madras : air1964mad90 , where the constitutional validity of the madras inams (assessment) act (xl of 1956) was questioned, and particularly the contention therein was that the assent of the president was obtained to a colourable legislation. the advocate general, .....

A. Sanjeevi Naidu and ors. Vs. the Madras State Transport Undertaking ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1970)1MLJ300

..... we have accepted the affidavit of the secretary to the government of madras, industries, labour and housing department, that business, relating to the motor vehicles act and nationalised bus transport are attended to by the minister for works under whom he is working, it is unnecessary to refer to the allocation of business among ..... in his counter affidavit, dated 7th november, 1967 that the minister in charge of works is the concerned minister who deals with transport including motor vehicles act and nationalised transport. having heard both counsel on this point, we accept his statement that it is the concerned minister who made the endorsement. whether the endorsement ..... the secretary in his last affidavit states that the minister in charge of works is the concerned minister who deals with transport including : motor vehicles act and nationalised transport, and that is the minister that had formed the necessary opinion. it is stated that the opinion having been formed the director of the .....