Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 section 1 short title and commencement Page 10 of about 7,065 results (0.418 seconds)

Central Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR304(Jhr)]

..... royalty for the minerals fire-clay extracted in course of mining activities.2. the petitioner's case is that the central coal field limited is a government company and carrying on mining activities in the coal mines area having been nationalized under the cooking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 and coal mines nationalization act, 1973. the coal mines were acquired under the aforesaid act and all rights and obligations are governed by the said ..... act. it is contended that since no lease in respect of mineral .....

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... streets and fire fighting are applicable to city not to the coal mines. the municipality cannot carry out any function in coal mines. conservancy is the function of the coal mines under section 20 of the mines act. coal mines are also responsible for cleanliness of canteen and its precincts under mines rules, 1967. under mines rules 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and ..... for coalmining purpose to m/s acc company in the year 1941, later on the coal mines were nationalized under the coal mines nationalization act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1973). under section 11 of the act of 1973, the mine can be vested in the central government company and the government company will be entitled ..... in the nature of fee for the service rendered by jal sansthan.11. coming to the question whether levy of charges entrench upon regulation of coal mines under the mmrd act. the apex court in state of west bengal v. kesoram industies ltd. and others (supra) considered the taxing power of union and states. .....

Dr. Jai Prakash NaraIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR271(Jhr)]

..... and disposed of by not less than two judges of that high court :provided further that any appeal which has not been preferred before the date on which the coal mines nationalization laws (amendment) act, 1978, receives the assent of the president, shall be preferred, within a period of sixty days from such date,' 2. in the supplementary affidavit filed by the appellant ..... order1. this appeal has been filed purportedly under sub-section (7) of section 23 of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973. sub-section (7) of section 23 reads as under :--'(7) a claimant or owner who is dissatisfied with the decision of the commissioner may prefer an appeal, within a .....

Kripa Shankar Dwivedi Son of Shri Ranjit Ram and ors. Vs. U.P. State E ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ687All

..... to dismissal of some of the employees of the new dharmaband colliery was pending on the date of enforcement of coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. the new dharmaband colliery which vested in the central government and subsequently in the bharat coking coal company ltd. both were made respondents before the tribunal. the award was delivered subsequently reinstating the employee with back wages fixing .....

Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]52STC62(Mad)

..... dispute that even today burn & company is still existing. 9. the counsel for the petitioner also relies upon the decision in western coal fields ltd. v. sales tax officer [1977] 40 stc 225, wherein in respect of coal mines (nationlisation) act, under similar circumstances it has been held that the peremptory provisions found in section 28 therein, which corresponds to section 25 in this ..... government with effect from 19th december, 1973, by virtue of the burn company and indian standard wagon company (taking over of management) act, 1973. later, burn & co. was nationalised under act 97 of 1976 and by virtue of the provisions of that act, with effect from 1st april 1975, the undertaking, i.e., the assets only of burn & company ltd. and the right, title .....

Eastern Coalfield Ltd. Vs. Niranjan Chatterjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [2009(121)FLR1080],(2008)IIILLJ439Cal

..... 5/1999 by the central government industrial tribunal-cum-labour court, asansol.2. the petitioner is a government company within the meaning of companies act, 1956. by reason of enactment or coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973, the right, title and interest of the petitioner company, being a colliery, vested in the central government. according to the petitioner ..... relies upon the decision of western india automobile association v. the industrial tribunal, bombay and ors. 1949 ii llj 245 (sc) and mohan mahto v. central coal field ltd and ors. air 2008 sc 39 to submit that the dispute in between the employer and all workmen was covered by the term of workman under ..... before the respondent no. 3 mr. bandopadhyay submitted that the definition of workman as contained in sub-section (s) of section 2 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 would confer a right upon the respondent no. 1 to obtain appointment of his dependant son on compassionate ground. he also submitted that the workman could .....

Bera Colliery Company Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR749(Jhr)]

..... a) every amount paid to the owner of every coking coal mine or group of coking coal mines under section 10, or of every coke oven plant under section 11, of the coking coal act, or to the owner of every coal mine or group of coal mines under section 3 of the coal mines act (hereinafter in either case referred to as the owner), ..... arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. the act, which came into force on 23.12.1986, amended both the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 and the coal mines (nationalization) act. 1973. we are concerned here with the amendment to coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 which came into force on 1.5.1973. it is not ..... ground that the statement of accounts or supplementary statement of accounts required to be prepared under section 22 of the coking coal act or, as the case may be, section 19 of the coal mines act, had not been prepared in accordance with the normal commercial practice or that any item has or has not been included .....

Guru Pada Ghosh Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial Tribun ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR217]; [2004(1)JCR66(Jhr)]

..... defalcation of money, belonging to the cooperative stores of the colliery. under the coal mines nationalization act, 1973 ('nationalization act' for short), the colliery was nationalized. it appears that a criminal case was also instituted against the petitioner regarding the said defalcation in which ..... including reference case no. 41 of 1988, or the preliminary point of maintainability and held that they are not maintainable in view of the coal mines nationalization law (amendment) act, 1986 (amendment act' for short).2. the petitioner, an employee of loyabad colliery, after due enquiry was dismissed on 6.4.1968 on the charge of ..... 14 stood substituted with effect from 1.5.1973 as follows :'14. liability of officer or other employee of a coal mine for transfer to any other coal mine. notwithstanding anything contained in the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947) or in any other law for the time being in force, the services of any .....

Bera Colliery Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR628(Jhr)]

..... binding on the owner. the compensation payable to the owner has also been quantified in the schedule to the coal mines nationalization act. that compensation includes the value of the stock of coal extracted and available in the premises of the mine as on the day of the takeover of the management. the account prepared by the defendant-company in that ..... , the petittoner in cwjc no. 2091/9hr), the owner of bera colliery, taken over under the coal mines nationalization act was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that the suit was barred by section 19 of the coal mines nationalization laws (amendment) act (act 57 of 1986). it is not disputed that the suit is hit by section 19 of ..... act 57 of 1986. it was in that context that the plaintiff, the appellant of 1986. we have, by .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. North Tetulmari Colliery Comp

Court : Patna

..... have been referred to division bench for decision as to whether the order passed by the appellate authority under section 23(1) of (the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act) is revisable by the high court under section 115 of the code of civil procedure.2. as the point of reference is very limited, ..... of by not lets than two judges of that high court.provided further that any appeal which has not been preferred before the date on which the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) act, 1972, receives the assent of the president shall be preferred within a period of sixty days from such date.6. mr. mehta appearing on behalf ..... to entertain such claim petition and law provides that an appeal will lie under section 23(1) of the act to the principal civil court of original jurisdiction within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the coking coal mine or coke oven plant is situated, can it be said that such appellate court is not a court subordinate .....