Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 934 results (0.213 seconds)

May 24 2004 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3519

..... distinct concepts. again, in para 23 thereof, it was noticed that no tax could be levied or is leviable under the act if no mining activities are carried on. hence, it is manifest that it is not related to land as a unit which is the ..... it falls within entry 50 will be ultra vires the state legislative power in view of section 9(3) of the central act. in hingir-rampur coal co. ltd., v. the state of orissa : [1961]2scr537 (supra), wanchoo j. in his dissenting judgment has stated ..... : [2001]2scr198 ; in the case of k. ramanathan v. state of tamilnadu and anr., : [1985]2scr1028 in the case of the hingir -rampur coal co. ltd. and ors. v. the state of orissa and ors., : [1961]2scr537 ; in the case of orissa cement limited v. state of ..... with precision and then proceeded to ascertain whether the impugned legislation trenches upon the excepted field.' in the cases of western coal fields ltd. v. special area development authority, korea and anr., : [1982]2scr1 the supreme court took the view that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2001 (HC)

H.V. Thimmegowda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3156; [2002(94)FLR928]; ILR2001KAR3683; 2001(4)KarLJ548

..... (62 of 1962); 17. the emergency risks (factories) insurance act, 1962 (63 of 1962); 18. the emergency risks (goods) insurance act, 1971 (50 of 1971); 19. the emergency risks (undertakings) insurance act, 1971 (51 of 1971); 20. the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972); 21. the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 vide act 46 of 1981, section 2'. from 'the economic offences (inapplicability ..... thus:'2. definitions.--in this act, unless the context otherwise requires.- (a) 'appropriate government' means.- (i) in relation to an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the central government or in relation to an establishment connected with a railway company, a major port, a mine or an oilfield or a controlled industry or in relation to an establishment having departments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2002 (HC)

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant365

..... vis-a-vis the right to property in articles 19(1)(f) and 31 as well as the interpretation, 'compensation' from ms. bela benerji to banks nationalisation's case do establish that the parliament has ultimately wrested the power to amend the constitution, without violating its basic features or structure. concomitantly legislature has power ..... :-- 'notification no. rd 217 lra 93 bangalore, dated 8th march, 1994 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (karnataka act 10 of 1962), the government of karnataka hereby directs that the land used for cultivation of lineally referred to in clause (vi) of the sub-section (1 ..... estate (hereinafter referred to as the 'estate') and the rights, title and interest of the owners and transferees in relation to theestate shall, by virtue of this act stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the state government. 4. general effect of vesting.-- (1) the estate shall be deemed to include all assets, rights .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1986 (HC)

M.P. Abdul Khander Vs. Vijaya Bank and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas199(Kar); ILR1987KAR970

..... the law provides that such an order, though it has become final, would be unexecutable./ no such provision is to be found wither in the bank nationalisation act or in the public premises act. 14. it is a case where the present revision petitioner claims to have become a sub - tenant after the institution of h. r. c ..... premises became public premises within the meaning of section 2(e) of thee public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act and that in view of section 15 of the said act, the decree had become unexecutable. the act nationalising the banks came into force on april 15, 1980. the court below overruled the objections of the judgment debtor. ..... to vijay bank ltd. therefore, whether rights has been obtained by vijay bank ltd. were got by the nationalised vijay bank as laid down by section 5 of the banking companies (acquisition and transferred of undertakings) act, 1980. therefore, the right that has become rested cannot be nullified by any subsequent proceedings which has no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2012 (HC)

Sri H. D. Kumarswamy Former Chief Minister of Son of Sri H.D. Devegowd ...

Court : Karnataka

..... rules, 1980 can be taken by a competent court only upon a complaint lodged by a competent officer under section 22 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short. mmdr act'). vii. the petitioner is a member of parliament and he was the iormer chief minister of karnataka state, therefore, there must be ..... prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and subject to the decision of the revision pending before the central mines tribunal against the lease granted in favour of visl under section 17a of the mmdr act. therefore, grant of mining lease in favour of shree sai venkateshwara minerals do not attract an offence punishable under section 13(l)( ..... l)(d) r/w section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (for short, the p.c.act'). iii. the averments of complaint that the petitioner had renewed mining lease in favour of m/s.janthakal enterprises and exerted pressure on the commissioner of mines & geology to issue permit for lifting old dump of 1 lakh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2012 (HC)

Sri S.M. Krishna Son of Sri S.C. Mallaiah. Vs. the State of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 13(l)(d). 13(l)(c) & section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. offences punishable under sections 104 and 104(c) of the karnataka forest act. 1963; the forest (conservation) act, 1980; mines and minerals (development and regulation) act. 1957 and also offences punishable under sections 204. 405. 406. 463, 465, 468, ..... 13(l)(d) 13(l)(e) & section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act. 1988. offences punishable under sections 104 and 104(c) of the karnataka forest act, 1963; the forest (conservation) act, 1980; mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and also offences punishable under sections 204, 405. 406, 463. 465. 468. ..... secretary to the government. forest department, who had expressed disagreement for de-reservation. these acts of petitioner resulted in destruction of vast forest area and led to large-scale illegal mining. the petitioner by the above acts has abused his position as chief minister of karnataka and illegally amassed wealth in the name .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1993 (HC)

Appropriate Authority Vs. Mass Traders Private Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1993)111CTR(Kar)294; ILR1993KAR1018

..... to protection of article 19 and that individual right is not lost by reason of the fact that he is a shareholder of the company and that the bank nationalisation case has established the view that the fundamental rights of shareholders are not lost when they associate to form a company. it is further held that when their ..... as under: 'we may clarity that as far as completed transactions are concerned, namely, where after the order for compulsory purchase under section 269ud of the income tax act was made and possession has been taken over, compensation paid to the owner of the property and accepted without protest, we see no reason to upset those transactions and ..... a petition under article 226 of the constitution as his right to manage the company and to receive remuneration therefor had been infringed by the provisions of the impugned act. therefore, it is not possible to hold that the aforesaid decision would be of any assistance to sri kapur. no personal right of sri kapur is infringed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2000 (HC)

State of Karnataka and Others Vs. B. Krishna Bhat and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2030; 2001(2)KarLJ1

..... and proper functioning of an independent judiciary, like the high court, is a part of the essential basic structure of our constitution, therefore, all the legislative acts and the administrative or executive orders concerning the high court administration must conform with the law laid down by the supreme court. if there be any irreconcilable ..... be correctly resolved because it is my view, in utmost humility, that no administrative direction that is in conflict with the provisions of the high court act could have been issued by the chief justice. that direction would therefore have to be quashed'.the learned judge has also aired certain grievances regarding allotment ..... the power of the chief justice to allocate different classes or categories of cases to different judges cannot be called in question as long as he acts fairly and reasonably, the validity of such allocation should stand the test of arbitrariness and capriciousness; that every judge of the high court being a constitutional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1965 (HC)

Narayan Nagappa Hegde Vs. Shankar Narasimha Bhatta

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1966Kant5; AIR1966Mys5; ILR1965KAR143; (1965)1MysLJ223

..... the aspects of the question raised by krishnaswami rao viz., whether the sub-collector and the district collector functioning under the provisions of the madras agriculturists relief act, 1938 were civil courts and if so whether those courts were subordinate to the high court under section 115 of the code. in considering this question ..... only illustrative and not exhaustive of other categories of courts subordinate to the high court.(8) mr. krishnaswami rao does not dispute the fact that under the act the mamlatdar and the assistant commissioner exercising their respective powers are courts. i have already referred to s. 23(3) where express provision has been made ..... favour of the respondent since the tahsildar declined to certify the sub-leas as being in contravention of the provisions of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, and he never delivered possession in pursuance of that document. the respondent however, contended that he had been put in possession and had been cultivating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1991 (HC)

V. Lakshmipathy and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1992Kant57

..... -wife who led a crusade to cleanup a river in massachusetts; b) a california pharmacist who saved a red-wood forest; c) a pennsylvania mine-inspector who repaired a strip-mined land; d) a wisconsin architect who saved a town affected by floods and redesigned it as a flood-proof solar village; e) a plumber ..... and sri h. thipperudrappa for the b.d.a. 13. of contextual relevance is sub-section (3) of section 9 of the karnataka town & country planning act, 1961 ('the act' for short) which reads as follows :--'(3) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2),-- (i) if any planning authority has prepared a plan for the ..... the location and operation of industries and industrial enterprises in a residential area in alleged gross violation of the provisions of the karnataka town and country planning act. the petitioners are questioning industrial activity in residential locality by establishing and running factories, work-shops, factory sheds, manufacture of greases and lubricating oils by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //