Court : Chennai
(Prayer: This Revision is filed under Section 379 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order, dated 18th May 2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.524 of 2014 in E.O.C.C.No.84 of 2001 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.II), Egmore, Chennai 600 008.) 1. This petition is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.524 of 2014 in E.O.C.C.No.84 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.II), Egmore, Chennai, dated 18.05.2015 discharging the respondent from the case. 2. The facts leading to the case are as follows:- The petitioner/complainant preferred a complaint under Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973, punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the said Act r/w Sub Section 3(3) and (4) of Section 49 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.II), Egmore, Madras-8 stating that the accused had acquired forei...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
P.N. Prakash, J. 1. The circumstances under which this Division Bench came to be constituted for deciding the issues arising in this reference require to be recapitulated, for which, it may be necessary to briefly state the factual matrix. [a] On 24.05.2015, two groups, categorised as "A" party and "B" party, lodged complaints against each other before the Inspector of Police, Gandhikuppam Police Station, based on which, petition enquiries were being conducted in CSR Nos. 74 of 2015 and 75 of 2015. According to the members of "A" party, the land in Survey No.562/2AB measuring 1.38 acres belongs to them and the members of "B" party are contending that the said land belongs to Bharathamatha Temple and were asserting their right to hold the Mahabaratham festival. The police, apprehending a breach of peace, registered an FIR in Cr.No.202 of 2015 and forwarded a report to the Executive Magistrate-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer for initiating proceedings u/s 107 Cr.P.C. Based on the report s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the Tamil Nadu Establishment of Private Law Colleges (Prohibition) Act, 2014 (Act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India. Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the Tamil Nadu Establishment of Private Law Colleges (Prohibition) Act, 2014 (Act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India. Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order made in Lr.No.4331/Regr/ACAD/A3/2014, dated 28.1.2015 issued by the second respondent, to quash the same and forbear the first respondent from interfering with the petitioner's right to process its affiliation through the second respondent to commence the law course in Saraswathi ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer in Crl.O.P. No.19197 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.08.2016.) Common Order: 1. These Criminal Original Petitions are filed seeking a direction to the respondents to register the petitioners' complaints dated 17.08.2016. 2. Every Judge who is assigned the Section 482, Cr.P.C. portfolio has to perforce undergo an unenviable task of dealing with petitions praying for a direction to the police to register an FIR on the complaint that is said to have been given by the petitioners. Each Judge would devise his or her own mechanism to deal with the spate of such petitions which will be in hundreds week after week. 3. When I assumed this portfolio, I too had to deal with these petitions and the method I evolved was to read the complaints, hear the counsel for the petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor and pass the following orders, depending upon the fact...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Revision case under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 3.10.2011 made in A1-2228-11 on the file of the second respondent (Crl.R.C.(MD).No.863 of 2011) Revision case under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 8.6.2015 made in Na.Ka.A4/ 10773/2014 on the file of the first respondent (Crl.R.C.(MD).No.315 of 2015) Original petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in Mu.Mu.5025/2014/A3 dated 31.12.2014 on the file of the Revenue Divisional Magistrate, Pattukottai and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned. (Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4819 of 2015)) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. Many times, places of worship, to which people go, seeking solace and peace, become places where there is disruption of peace. No place of worship of any particular religion is an exception to this Rule. In 2 out of 3 cases on hand, the dispute relates to place...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with Sec. 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 20.01.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukkundram in Crl.M.P.No.3962 of 2015.) This revision arises out of dismissal of bail petition in Crl.M.P.No.3962 of 2015 filed in P.R.C.No.1 of 2015 under Section 330 Cr.P.C. 2. Petitioner is a CISF [Central Industrial Security Force] Constable. He was carrying out his duties at the Atomic Energy Power Station in Kalpakkam. On 08.10.2014, with his service rifle he is alleged to have shot dead three persons and also wounded one person. 3. Respondent police registered a case in Crime No.241 of 2014 under Section 307, 302 I.P.C. The case has been committed to the Court of Sessions. Now, it is pending in S.C.No.242 of 2015 before the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Chengalput. 4. While the said case was pending in P.R.C. No.1 of 2015 (Preliminary Register Case) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: T.O.S.No.2 of 2009 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.367 of 2008, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that Letters of Administration with a Will annexed, may be granted to the plaintiff as the daughter and one of the legatees under the Will of the deceased S.V.Ramakrishnan, having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.) 1. T.O.S.No.2 of 2009 is numbered on conversion of O.P.No.367 of 2008, praying that Letters of Administration with a Will annexed, may be granted to the plaintiff as the daughter and one of the legatees under the Will of the deceased S.V.Ramakrishnan, having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu. 2. The case of the plaintiff is as follows: (a) The father of the plaintiff is late Mr.S.V.Ramakrishnan and he died on 31.12.1980 at "Ramamandiram" No.868, Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010, where he was then ordinarily residing within t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 and 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to set aside the order dated 19.10.2015 passed by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015 in Crl.M.P.No.4323 of 2015 in Crime No.304 of 2015 and to issue direction to release the petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail in Crime No.304 of 2015 dated 1.8.2015 on the file of Central Crime Branch-II, EDF-III, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, in accordance with Section 167(2)(a)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 pending disposal of this petition and during investigation and trial.) 1. A very interesting question of law has been raised by Mr.Amit Prasad, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, for determination by this Court in this Revision Case. For better appreciation, it may be apposite to state in brief the facts in this case. 2. (a) On a complaint lodged by one K.S.Kumar, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 24.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8421 of 2014 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 1.M.Kalyani Mathivanan 2.A.Muthumanickam 3.R.Kannan 4.M.Rajarajan 5.K.Pitchaimani 6.K.Periyakaruppan 7.P.P.Chelladurai 8.G.JeyaLakshmi 9.K.Arivalagan 10.Suganandhan 11.The Principal, University Constituent College, Madurai Kamaraj University, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District..Petitioners versus M.Parthasarathi ..Respondent PRAYER Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in connection with P.R.C.No.19 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, Madurai District and to quash the Impugned Private Complaint dated 06.01.2014 and the summons issued thereupon dated 15.04.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Vijayan Senior Counsel for M/s.T.Sakthikumaran ^For Respondent : Mr.D.Selvam for M/s.G.Thalaimutharasu :ORDER The petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 01-2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Civil Suit No.562 of 2007 M.C.Jayasingh ...Plaintiff Vs 1. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited (MIDHANI) rep.by its Managing Director, Kanchanbagh Hyderabad 500 058.2. Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills Road Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.3. Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited Ali Towers, IV Floor, 55, Greams Road Chennai 600 006.4. Cancer Institute (W.I.A) (Regional Cancer Centre), Canal Bank Road Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. ...Defendants ----- Plaint under Order VII, Rule 1, CPC, read with Order IV, Rule of the Original Side Rules, Section 108 read with Section 50(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 and Section 22(2)(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. ----- For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Sundar For Defendant-1 : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For Defendants 2&3 : Mr.C.Manishankar For Defendant-4 : Mr.N.L.Rajah ----- JUDGMENT This is a suit for infringement of patents and designs and for rendition of accounts ...
Tag this Judgment!