Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Apr-04-2007
Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]
..... west singhbhum jharkhand. on 26.3.2004 the state government also entered into mou with the petitioner and for setting up mini blast furnace, iron ore mining and crushing & coal mining in west singhbhum of jharkhand at the proposed investment of rs. 71.40 crores. petitioner's case is that after mou was signed the state government ..... learned counsel lastly submitted that the central government mechanically returned the recommendations to the state government without application of mind and without considering the statutory provisions of the acts and the rules.18. in all the writ petitions, common stand taken by the petitioners is that ghatkuri iron ore deposits, was unreserved at the time of ..... entry 23 of list ii as well as article 162 and 298 of the constitution of india and submitted that power or reservation of mining area for public sector flows from mmrd act enacted by parliament in entry 54 of list i. according to learned counsel rule 39(1)(e) empowers the state government to reserve .....
Tag this Judgment!