Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2003(3)JCR296(Jhr)]; (2003)IIILLJ1082Jhar
..... that the following facts are un-controverted.(i) m/s. oriental coal company limited (company for short) was the owner of the coal mine, namely badjna colliery, which was nationalized under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. at the time of taking over of the mine, the said company refused to handover the barakar engineering and foundry ..... works limited (befw) to the custodian/central government, on the ground that the same was a separate establishment and the same has not vested under the nationalisation act. the ..... in future.(ii) the said dispute regarding vesting of befw was taken to the supreme court. the supreme court while holding that the nationalisation act was constitutionally valid, did not specifically held that befw should be handed over to the said company and left the question open for determination .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2003(3)BLJR2164; [2003(3)JCR787(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ346Jhar
..... of workman dip lal singh with back wages w.e.f. 1st may, 1972, the date from which the coking coal mines were placed under m/s. bccl on its nationalization under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. the appellant-employer in relation to bararee coke plant of m/s. bccl dhanbad challenged the award before the ..... after more than two months of termination of his services. the services of the employees of coking coal mines or coke oven plants, were taken over later on, w.e.f. 1.5.1972 under section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 (act no. 36 of 1972), gazetted on 17th of august, 1972. thereby services of the workman ..... 19th october, 1979 in its own right because it was divested of all its rights and powers of management in relation to the 'coking coal mines' after enforcement of the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971 (act no. 64 of 1971). in view of the aforesaid finding, the division bench further held that the m/s. bararee coking co. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2004(101)FLR217]; [2004(1)JCR66(Jhr)]
..... defalcation of money, belonging to the cooperative stores of the colliery. under the coal mines nationalization act, 1973 ('nationalization act' for short), the colliery was nationalized. it appears that a criminal case was also instituted against the petitioner regarding the said defalcation in which ..... including reference case no. 41 of 1988, or the preliminary point of maintainability and held that they are not maintainable in view of the coal mines nationalization law (amendment) act, 1986 (amendment act' for short).2. the petitioner, an employee of loyabad colliery, after due enquiry was dismissed on 6.4.1968 on the charge of ..... 14 stood substituted with effect from 1.5.1973 as follows :'14. liability of officer or other employee of a coal mine for transfer to any other coal mine. notwithstanding anything contained in the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947) or in any other law for the time being in force, the services of any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2004(4)JCR437(Jhr)]
..... the impugned judgment that proforma dependent-respondent no. 7 was the owner of karampura dewarkhand colliery prior to the vesting of the coal mines under the coal mines (nationalization) act. 1973 and the plaintiff-respondent had entered into a contract with him for removal of the overburden work in the said colliery ..... aforesaid bills informed the plaintiff-respondent that the aforesaid equipments in question stood vested in the central government and, thereafter, with the coal mines authority under the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 on and from 01.05.1973 and the question of giving them back or payment of hire charges therefore to the ..... karanpura dewarkhand colliery private limited was the owner of karanpura dewarkhand colliery, p.o. khelari. district ranchi prior to the vesting of the coal mines under the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 and the plaintiff-respondent entered into a contract with defendant-respondent no. 7 for removal of over burden work in the said .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]
..... west singhbhum jharkhand. on 26.3.2004 the state government also entered into mou with the petitioner and for setting up mini blast furnace, iron ore mining and crushing & coal mining in west singhbhum of jharkhand at the proposed investment of rs. 71.40 crores. petitioner's case is that after mou was signed the state government ..... learned counsel lastly submitted that the central government mechanically returned the recommendations to the state government without application of mind and without considering the statutory provisions of the acts and the rules.18. in all the writ petitions, common stand taken by the petitioners is that ghatkuri iron ore deposits, was unreserved at the time of ..... entry 23 of list ii as well as article 162 and 298 of the constitution of india and submitted that power or reservation of mining area for public sector flows from mmrd act enacted by parliament in entry 54 of list i. according to learned counsel rule 39(1)(e) empowers the state government to reserve .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR267(Jhr)]; (2008)18VST289(Jharkh)
..... (t) no. 6377 of 20076. in this case, the petitioner m/s. shivam coke industries is a manufacturer of coal and was registered under the provisions of the bihar finance act, 1981 (in short bft act 1981). and presently under the provisions of jharkhand value added tax, 2005. petitioner's case is that aggrieved by the assessment ..... before the joint commissioner for initiation of suo motu proceeding under section 46(4) of the act.w.p. (t) no. 5895 of 20077. the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in processing of coal to coke. this case also relates to financial years between 1984-1985 to 2000-2001. the ..... the calcutta high court, placed before us by the respondent have no relevance.our attention has been invited to section 34 of the maharashtra agriculture income tax act, 1962 where when defining the revisional power of the commissioner the legislature has expressly incorporated a provision prohibiting the commissioner from exercising his revisional power against an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... mining lease for minerals other than coal, lignite and atomic minerals. (1) the provisions of this section shall apply to minerals other than those specified in part a and part b of the first schedule (2) on and from the date of the commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, all mining ..... leases shall be granted for the period of fifty years. (3) all mining ..... in sub-sections (2), (3) and sub- section (4), the period of lease granted before the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, where mineral is used for other than captive purpose, shall be extended and be deemed to have been extended up to a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... mining lease for minerals other than coal, lignite and atomic minerals. (1) the provisions of this section shall apply to minerals other than those specified in part a and part b of the first schedule (2) on and from the date of the commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, all mining ..... leases shall be granted for the period of fifty years. (3) all mining ..... in sub-sections (2), (3) and sub- section (4), the period of lease granted before the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, where mineral is used for other than captive purpose, shall be extended and be deemed to have been extended up to a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... mining lease for minerals other than coal, lignite and atomic minerals. (1) the provisions of this section shall apply to minerals other than those specified in part a and part b of the first schedule (2) on and from the date of the commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, all mining ..... leases shall be granted for the period of fifty years. (3) all mining ..... in sub-sections (2), (3) and sub- section (4), the period of lease granted before the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, where mineral is used for other than captive purpose, shall be extended and be deemed to have been extended up to a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... tender conditions give an option to the tenderer, to furnish earnest money deposit, by pledging nsc/postal time deposit/postal saving passbook/deposit receipts issued by any nationalised bank. the first respondent pledged a postal td account passbook relating to a deposit of rs 1,70,000 in fulfilment of the condition regarding emd. the ..... co. pvt. ltd; while for the other three, namely (i) m/s. montecarlo ltd., (ii) m/s. amar dev prabha consortium, and (iii) m/s. ambey mining pvt. ltd. faced the same problem intermittently.2. the service provider, m/s. c1 india pvt. ltd. was well connected to the server running the web application throughout the reverse ..... satarkta bhawan, a-block, gpo complex, i.n.a. new delhi-110023, po & ps i.n.a., district new delhi 3.the bharat coking coal limited, a company registered under the companies act, 1956 and government of india undertaking, through its chairman cum managing director, having registered office at koyla bhawan, po & ps koyla nagar, dist. dhanbad .....
Tag this Judgment!