Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... not be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... itself. the signatures in the certificate were also identified. that is apparently in compliance with the procedure prescribed under section 65b of the evidence act. however, it was held that irrespective of the compliance with the requirements of section 65b, which is a special provision dealing with admissibility of ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... fact been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions ..... comparison. 279. the specimen signatures having been taken prior to 2006, they were required to confirm to the mandate prescribed under section 73 indian evidence act. as sapan haldar (supra) rightly points out, any such specimen signatures taken even after so directed by the magistrate would be inadmissible except when ..... questioned during his cross-examination about his previous convictions or bad character (which is otherwise impermissible under law in view of section 54 of indian evidence act, 1872). therefore, proviso (c) sub-clause (iii) expressly contemplates reception of evidence by an accused against the co-accused, however in such cases .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-21-2015
..... . according to pll, the commencement of commercial operations was delayed due to non-availability of coal which according to pll was not its obligation. pll states that gvk was unable to arrange the coal on account of its coal mine allocation being cancelled pursuant to the order of the supreme court and also on account of ..... advocates. coram: justice s. muralidhar judgement % 21.04.2015 1. punj lloyd ltd ( pll ) has filed these petitions under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( act ) seeking interim reliefs against the respondent gvk power (goindwal sahib) ltd. ( gvk ). background facts 2. gvk was awarded a contract by the state of punjab for ..... the question that arose for determination was which court will have the jurisdiction to entertain and decide an application under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act?. in that case, an application under section 9 had been filed in the high court of calcutta. later an application under section 11 was filed also .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-27-2015
..... cited by the counsel for cci carving out a distinction between review and recall are of no avail. (zv) the existence of a provision in the competition act for penalizing the complainant / informant for making a misdealing / false statement leading to investigation being ordered cannot take away the right of the person / enterprise ..... and exceptional cases. (r) again, as aforesaid, cci can order/direct investigation only if forms a prima facie opinion of violation of provisions of the act having been committed. our constitutional values and judicial principles by no stretch of imagination would permit an investigation where say cci orders/directs investigation without forming ..... of hearing to the affected party; (ii) rajeev hitendra pathak vs. achyut kashinath karekar (2011) 9 scc541laying down in the context of consumer protection act, 1986 that tribunals are creatures of the statute and derive their power from the express provisions of the statute and that the district forums and the state .....
Tag this Judgment!